View Poll Results: Top Flames Prospect Left on the List?
|
Agostino
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Arnold
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Berra
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Billins
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Bouma
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Breen
|
  
|
1 |
0.38% |
Brossoit
|
  
|
1 |
0.38% |
Culkin
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Cundari
|
  
|
2 |
0.77% |
Deblouw
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Eddy
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Elson
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Ferland
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Gilmour
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Gordon
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Granlund
|
  
|
3 |
1.15% |
Hanowski
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Harrison
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Horak
|
  
|
3 |
1.15% |
Howse
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Jooris
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Kanzig
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Klimchuk
|
  
|
7 |
2.69% |
Knight
|
  
|
54 |
20.77% |
Kulak
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Martin
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Nemisz
|
  
|
1 |
0.38% |
Ortio
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Poirier
|
  
|
18 |
6.92% |
Rafikov
|
  
|
1 |
0.38% |
Ramage
|
  
|
1 |
0.38% |
Ramo
|
  
|
7 |
2.69% |
Reinhart
|
  
|
4 |
1.54% |
Roy
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Sieloff
|
  
|
67 |
25.77% |
Wotherspoon
|
  
|
90 |
34.62% |
08-07-2013, 08:36 AM
|
#2
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
for the first time I didn't have my choice graduated; had to repeat for Wotherspoon
I see him as the most likely defenseman to play in the top three, and being very likely to play in the NHL
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-07-2013, 08:43 AM
|
#3
|
First Line Centre
|
Wotherspoon I see as a solid, well rounded second pair D. Seiloff I like, but his offence is more limited. Teams need a guy like him IMO, but I rate Wotherspoon a slight notch above
|
|
|
08-07-2013, 08:44 AM
|
#4
|
 Posted the 6 millionth post!
|
Wotherspoon is further ahead in development than Poirier and Klimchuk, and I believe has a higher ceiling than Seiloff. I picked Wotherspoon as well.
|
|
|
08-07-2013, 08:46 AM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
|
first time since Monahan/Baertschi at 1, I was unsure of my vote ... chose Wotherspoon over Knight.
|
|
|
08-07-2013, 08:48 AM
|
#6
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Starting to get tough. I was thinking Kilmchuck, or Poirier due to being first round picks in what is considered a deep draft. I went with Wortherspoon who made the World Juniors in a lockout year and played great all-season in Portland from all the accounts I have read
|
|
|
08-07-2013, 09:00 AM
|
#7
|
Franchise Player
|
Picked Wotherspoon last round and i will pick him until he is off the board.
|
|
|
08-07-2013, 09:04 AM
|
#8
|
Scoring Winger
|
Round 6... FIGHT!
__________________
You look like I need a drink
|
|
|
08-07-2013, 09:06 AM
|
#9
|
Franchise Player
|
I went with Seiloff. Like his game and how he has been reported to take a leadership role in the US program.
Wotherspoon has a lot to like, but at the same time, played on a very very stacked team and had very strong partner's all year long.
I am really unclear on how to vote going forward, as i know little to nothing about klimchuk, porier, and knight.
|
|
|
08-07-2013, 09:10 AM
|
#10
|
Franchise Player
|
Knight, the most ready of the current list and has potential to be 2nd line to a solid 3rd line center.
|
|
|
08-07-2013, 09:12 AM
|
#11
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: section 219
|
Had to go with Horak. For a guy that is pretty much a regular at this point, not a lot of love.
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to freakinsaprikin For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-07-2013, 09:12 AM
|
#12
|
It's not easy being green!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: In the tubes to Vancouver Island
|
Flip flopping between Knight and Wotherspoon. Voted Knight last time, but went with Wotherspoon as I kind of wanted to change my vote last round.
__________________
Who is in charge of this product and why haven't they been fired yet?
|
|
|
08-07-2013, 09:13 AM
|
#13
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Went Wotherspoon, but can't shake the feeling that we are underrating Klimchuk and Poirier who were first rounders in a deep draft year.
Crazy to think the Flames are 10 prospects deep with really good talent, when was the last time that was the case?
1. Monahan - 45.78% ( http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthread.php?t=129540)
2. Baertschi - 82.12% ( http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthread.php?t=129559)
3. Gaudreau - 79.58% ( http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthread.php?t=129572)
4. Gillies - 45.22% ( http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthread.php?t=129588)
5. Jankowski - 51.25% ( http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthread.php?t=129608)
6. Wotherspoon
7. Poirier
8. Sieloff
9. Klimchuk
10. Knight
That is likely how the top 10 will shake out with some variation in picks between 7-10.
Plus it is crazy to think that we would still have guys like Granlund, Arnold, Agostino, Hanowski, Ramage, Cundari, Reinhart, Horak, Kulak, Culkin in the 11-20 group. Honestly our group of prospects from 11-20 are potentially better then the prospects we had in the 1-10 group just a couple of seasons ago.
Feaster gets alot of flack but he has seriously put together a decent group of prospects in just his 2 seasons with the team.
|
|
|
08-07-2013, 09:13 AM
|
#14
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
Switched from Seiloff to Wotherspoon.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imported_Aussie
Seiloff I like, but his offence is more limited.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame
I believe has a higher ceiling than Seiloff.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy
I went with Seiloff
|
too. many. Seiloffs! Won't somebody please think of the Sieloffs?
|
|
|
08-07-2013, 09:13 AM
|
#15
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Abbotsford, BC
|
Knight. Widely regarded to be NHL ready. Dominant in the faceoff dot.
|
|
|
08-07-2013, 09:19 AM
|
#16
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Montreal
|
I do feel many are underrating Poirier and Klimchuk, these guys should be the next 2 chosen, (though it seems clear that they wont be)
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Red Menace For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-07-2013, 09:19 AM
|
#17
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
|
I still think Sieloff will bring more intangibles to the table than Wotherspoon. Sieloff for me.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
|
|
|
08-07-2013, 09:22 AM
|
#18
|
Franchise Player
|
Now it starts to get interesting. The first 5 all have a realistic shot at being great players - core guys. So it was pretty easy to have them at the top.
The next group, IMO, probably have an expected upside of being solid, role guys and are close or ready to take the next step. Of course you never know and any of them can raise to a higher ceiling, but it would be more of a pleasant surprise.
In that group, I would put Wotherspoon (who I voted for), Sieloff, Knight, Horak, Reinhart and Agostino.
Then you have another group that I would argue have similar (in some cases, higher) ceiling, but still need to show that next step before they graduate into the second group (maybe even the first).
That group would include Poirier, Klimchuk, Granlund, Arnold, Brossoit, Cundari, Breen, Kulak and Culkin.
Then you got the wildcards like Kanzig, Ferland, Harrison, Jooris, DeBlouw, Roy and Rafikov.
Fun times.
Last edited by Enoch Root; 08-07-2013 at 09:31 AM.
|
|
|
08-07-2013, 09:24 AM
|
#19
|
Franchise Player
|
i just noticed that HF has their updated prospect team rankings, and the flames sit 20th.......
I would have thought the flames are in the top 15 by now.
|
|
|
08-07-2013, 09:24 AM
|
#20
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre "Monster" McGuire
Knight. Widely regarded to be NHL ready. Dominant in the faceoff dot.
|
What, you've stopped voting for Breen?
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:54 AM.
|
|