View Poll Results: How do you feel about the Russell trade
|
Great trade. More than I expected.
|
  
|
347 |
51.41% |
Good trade. Maybe slightly more than I expected
|
  
|
275 |
40.74% |
Average trade. Got fair market value.
|
  
|
48 |
7.11% |
Below average trade. Got slightly less than I expected.
|
  
|
5 |
0.74% |
Bad trade. Bad return for Russell.
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
02-29-2016, 05:59 PM
|
#641
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
Quote:
Farhan Lalji @FarhanLaljiTSN 23m23 minutes ago
After Russell trade, #Stars went back to Van & offered a higher pick than what they gave Cgy + prospect. It's believed Van didnt return call
|
Say what now?
(EDIT: Sorry, being discussed in the Vancouver is No Good 2 thread)
Last edited by shadowlord; 02-29-2016 at 06:03 PM.
|
|
|
02-29-2016, 06:00 PM
|
#642
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Steam Whistle
Sorry if this has already been discussed, but from a cheering for Dallas perspective, is the rank order of outcomes to maximize our value on that pick as follows?:
1. Dallas loses in conference finals
2. Dallas loses in Cup final
3. Dallas wins cup
4. Dallas loses in first round
5. Dallas loses in 2nd round
|
I just can't see Dallas overcoming a lot of teams in the West, so I don't have my hopes up. But if they do lose to Chicago or LA in the conference finals, Flames at best get a 27th OA pick? At worst they get a 50th OA pick?
|
|
|
02-29-2016, 06:00 PM
|
#643
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Steam Whistle
Sorry if this has already been discussed, but from a cheering for Dallas perspective, is the rank order of outcomes to maximize our value on that pick as follows?:
1. Dallas loses in conference finals (27/28 OA)
2. Dallas loses in Cup final (29 OA)
3. Dallas wins cup (30 OA)
4. Dallas misses the playoffs (2nd round)
5. Dallas loses in first round (2nd Round)
6. Dallas loses in 2nd round (2nd Round)
|
More like this
Last edited by Blarg; 02-29-2016 at 06:04 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Blarg For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-29-2016, 06:00 PM
|
#644
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacDaddy77
Curious why you think he will play with Hamilton as #4 dman? I would expect nakladal or Witherspoon will get a look at filling that spot for the rest of the year and he will slide into our 3 pairing with wideman.
|
Just guessing, but he has more NHL experience than Wotherspoon and Nakladal. Plus, they have been working well together so why break that up?
Also, it wasn't a prediction so much as a: wouldn't it be great if he became that guy to partner with Hamilton?
|
|
|
02-29-2016, 06:01 PM
|
#645
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesfan1297
As long as Dallas makes the conference final, win or lose, we get their first.
|
Yup, but where the pick is varries based on how they finish no? In the first three scenarios, it's a first, but it's an earlier fist the less success the have I believe (not that it matters much). I'm more interested in the last to scenarios, I assume our second rounder could be up to 8 slots hire if they lose first round vs. Second.
|
|
|
02-29-2016, 06:02 PM
|
#646
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkGio
I just can't see Dallas overcoming a lot of teams in the West, so I don't have my hopes up. But if they do lose to Chicago or LA in the conference finals, Flames at best get a 27th OA pick? At worst they get a 50th OA pick?
|
yeah. If they make the conference final, it's between 27 and 30. If they miss the playoffs, it's around 45 (not going to happen obviously). If they make the playoffs and crash out ahead of the conference final, it's probably somewhere between 50 and 55.
|
|
|
02-29-2016, 06:07 PM
|
#647
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
b
So you would put the 24 year old Jokipakka significantly ahead of the 22 year old Wotherspoon? He did not play his first NHL game until he was older than Wotherspoon is now.
Perhaps Wotherspoon is the magic mesher with Hamilton.... Hamilton has gone through Gio, Russell and Wideman and Engelland is looking like the better player in the current pairing.
The comparable that I think is valid to Pollak is Klimchuck. Similar numbers as Juniors in the WHL with Klimchuck a bit better.
So on the plus side you could say that Pollak is basically worth a Flames 1st round pick (outside of Monahan/Bennett that does not mean they will be NHLers.)
|
First of all, I never put him ahead of Wotherspoon. However, right now, at 24, he is ahead of where Wotherspoon is right now.
Also, I have said many times that I think Wotherspoon could be the guy that becomes Hamilton's partner.
Its not a ranking system, or who has the better GRIT index or whatever... it is simply a case of the Flames needing to find that #4. And every player that it might be is another opportunity for success.
Someone will be that guy.
If Jokipakka is, this trade is a home run. If Wotherspoon is - awesome.
|
|
|
02-29-2016, 06:08 PM
|
#648
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Steam Whistle
Yup, but where the pick is varries based on how they finish no? In the first three scenarios, it's a first, but it's an earlier fist the less success the have I believe (not that it matters much). I'm more interested in the last to scenarios, I assume our second rounder could be up to 8 slots hire if they lose first round vs. Second.
|
Yes. And other than the longshot of missing the playoffs, I believe you nailed it.
|
|
|
02-29-2016, 06:13 PM
|
#649
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Steam Whistle
Sorry if this has already been discussed, but from a cheering for Dallas perspective, is the rank order of outcomes to maximize our value on that pick as follows?:
1. Dallas loses in conference finals
2. Dallas loses in Cup final
3. Dallas wins cup
4. Dallas loses in first round
5. Dallas loses in 2nd round
|
4 & 5 don't matter. The pick will be the same if they lose in the first or second round.
Ideally, if Dallas doesn't go to the Conference Finals, we want as many lower-ranked teams to make the Conference Finals as possible to improve Dallas's pick.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
02-29-2016, 06:14 PM
|
#650
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Yes. And other than the longshot of missing the playoffs, I believe you nailed it.
|
Figured, but wasn't sure about whether the first two rounds mattered or only once you got to the conference finals before it mattered.
Edit: now based on get backs no longer sure.
|
|
|
02-29-2016, 06:24 PM
|
#651
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
I definitely think this is a better return than the Iginla deal.
Getting a young NHL ready defender is just such an oustanding return for a pending UFA defender.
|
|
|
02-29-2016, 06:42 PM
|
#652
|
Not a casual user
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina
Benning confirms that Dallas went with the Calgary deal over Vancouver's deal.
HAHAHAHAHAHA
|
__________________
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Dion For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-29-2016, 06:53 PM
|
#653
|
I believe in the Jays.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kitsilano
|
Really looking forward to seeing Jokipakka suit up for the Flames.
Admittedly I don't know much about him but as its been said a young NHL ready defender is a pretty solid return for a rental. Plus potentially a 1st round pick ultimately is a lot more than I expected.
Pollock sounds like someone who can provide good forward depth.
Really a great trade for the Flames imo.
|
|
|
02-29-2016, 07:00 PM
|
#654
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: City by the Bay
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Steam Whistle
Sorry if this has already been discussed, but from a cheering for Dallas perspective, is the rank order of outcomes to maximize our value on that pick as follows?:
1. Dallas loses in conference finals
2. Dallas loses in Cup final
3. Dallas wins cup
4. Dallas loses in first round
5. Dallas loses in 2nd round
|
1 and we hope the Panthers fall apart down the stretch.
|
|
|
02-29-2016, 07:02 PM
|
#655
|
Draft Pick
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Kelowna
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyhands23
BT so hot right now!
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to aznazz For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-29-2016, 07:48 PM
|
#656
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
USA Today ranks the Flames as 2nd best Trade deadline day
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports...line/81125964/
Quote:
2. Calgary Flames: General manager Brad Treliving hit a home run on the return he received for moving feisty, shot-blocking defenseman Kris Russell to the Dallas Stars.
No one doubts Russell’s ability to help the Stars, but they paid a heavy price to get him. They gave up a second-round pick that becomes a first-round pick if the Stars reach the Western Conference final. There’s been a resistance movement in the NHL against giving up first-round picks for rentals. Thus, it’s a major win for the Flames to have a chance to end up with a first-round pick for Russell.
The Flames also received 6-3 defenseman Jyrki Jokipakka, who has 91 games of NHL experience, plus Brett Pollock, considered a B or B- prospect. He’s been a 25-goal scorer in the Western Hockey League and will turn pro this season. Unquestionably, the Flames got more for Russell than anticipated.
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-29-2016, 07:59 PM
|
#657
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
They have thr B's as big winners too? It's like they gas away all of their picks except their firsts. IMO they over paid for the guys they got.
The Hawks were the big winners buyer wise but the flames were the biggest winners seller wise.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
02-29-2016, 08:29 PM
|
#658
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
First of all, I never put him ahead of Wotherspoon. However, right now, at 24, he is ahead of where Wotherspoon is right now.
Also, I have said many times that I think Wotherspoon could be the guy that becomes Hamilton's partner.
Its not a ranking system, or who has the better GRIT index or whatever... it is simply a case of the Flames needing to find that #4. And every player that it might be is another opportunity for success.
Someone will be that guy.
If Jokipakka is, this trade is a home run. If Wotherspoon is - awesome.
|
IIRC Wotherspoon was Hamilton's partner at the World Juniors.
|
|
|
02-29-2016, 08:33 PM
|
#659
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan
IIRC Wotherspoon was Hamilton's partner at the World Juniors.
|
yes he was = and they were a great pairing
|
|
|
02-29-2016, 09:04 PM
|
#660
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
Kristen Odland @Kristen_Odland
Brett Pollock on being traded mid-game to the #Flames: “I saw Gene Principe taking a picture of me so I thought that was a little odd."
|
What the hell? Does Gene have random pictures wallpapering rooms in his house.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
TEAM 1040 is spinning a rumour that the same deal Dallas made with the Flames was agreed upon by Benning and Nil, but that the deal was kiboshed by the Aquillini ownership group in Vancouver because of some childish ongoing feud they have with the Galliardi ownership group in Dallas. According to Bob Marjonovic, once Van renegged, Dallas turned to Calgary with the same deal.
|
Nothing like some egotistical Italian soap opera between two families for supposed "disrespect" for either/both teams, to have a sports trade fall apart. But given the Canucks spin on it, who knows.
As for the Dallas pick, an early/first team out of the playoffs for Dallas would would be no better than 46th?
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:56 PM.
|
|