Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-11-2026, 12:04 PM   #20341
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire View Post
Andersson should be kept out of the line-up until he's traded.
I agree, maybe Conroy views it as leverage in some way?
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2026, 12:07 PM   #20342
D as in David
Franchise Player
 
D as in David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macindoc View Post
I don’t think it’s the $$$ as much as the fact that you only get 2 retention slots. One is already used. Tying the other up for 3 more seasons limits a rebuilding team’s ability to get the best return for its other assets, so the price would have to be very high.
Teams get 3 retention slots or has that changed?
__________________
"9 out of 10 concerns are completely unfounded."

"The first thing that goes when you lose your hands, are your fine motor skills."
D as in David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2026, 12:10 PM   #20343
Inferno
Franchise Player
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Pas, MB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire View Post
Andersson should be kept out of the line-up until he's traded.
That's only going to happen if the deal is on the verge of being done or he's so banged up that the risk of playing him isn't worth it.
Inferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2026, 12:12 PM   #20344
Macindoc
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David View Post
Teams get 3 retention slots or has that changed?
No, I probably had it wrong.
Still, the point stands that there are a limited number. So it’s another kind of organizational asset. Retaining for 3+ seasons is worth a lot more than just part of one season, regardless of the amount retained.

Last edited by Macindoc; 01-11-2026 at 12:14 PM.
Macindoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2026, 12:13 PM   #20345
Samonadreau
Franchise Player
 
Samonadreau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
If that’s real that is actually a team friendly deal
If it's this season's Andersson it is likely team friendly, if it's last season's Andersson it is not.
Samonadreau is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2026, 12:14 PM   #20346
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macindoc View Post
I don’t think it’s the $$$ as much as the fact that you only get 2 retention slots. One is already used. Tying the other up for 3 more seasons limits a rebuilding team’s ability to get the best return for its other assets, so the price would have to be very high.
Honest question: Who else would they need retention for? What other notable veteran player would they be trading away and have a need for a retention slot? I think every other veteran is going to be here for the long term.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Cali Panthers Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2026, 12:17 PM   #20347
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Panthers Fan View Post
Honest question: Who else would they need retention for? What other notable veteran player would they be trading away and have a need for a retention slot? I think every other veteran is going to be here for the long term.
Sharangovich
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to gvitaly For This Useful Post:
Old 01-11-2026, 12:18 PM   #20348
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macindoc View Post
I don’t think it’s the $$$ as much as the fact that you only get 2 retention slots. One is already used. Tying the other up for 3 more seasons limits a rebuilding team’s ability to get the best return for its other assets, so the price would have to be very high.
I think you get 3 retention slots, unless that has been changed. We only have 2 right now until this season is over with Markstrom.

Rebuilding teams should definitely use them. We may not be able to do the 50% + 50% retention anymore, but we can still be a team that can broker the original 50% on expiring contracts to get a good pick.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2026, 12:27 PM   #20349
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inferno View Post
That's only going to happen if the deal is on the verge of being done or he's so banged up that the risk of playing him isn't worth it.
If the rumours are true then a deal is close to be done. Even if it's an estimated week or so away they shouldn't play him. An injury now would be a disaster for the organization.
__________________

Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2026, 12:31 PM   #20350
Inferno
Franchise Player
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Pas, MB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire View Post
If the rumours are true then a deal is close to be done. Even if it's an estimated week or so away they shouldn't play him. An injury now would be a disaster for the organization.
I'd say it's only close if Andersson is interested in an extension with Detroit and it's just a matter of working out the contract.
Inferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2026, 12:55 PM   #20351
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Panthers Fan View Post
Honest question: Who else would they need retention for? What other notable veteran player would they be trading away and have a need for a retention slot? I think every other veteran is going to be here for the long term.
This is my point too. No other asset will bring back as much value as a fully retained Kadri looking ahead to our retention slot use:

This year: Markstrom, Coleman, Kadri - Andersson blocked from retention
Next year: Coleman, Kadri, Hanley? / Pachal? - Meh, neither asset worth retaining
Following years: Kadri, Farabee?, ______ - Still have an empty slot, so no impact to retaining on Kadri

The other potential retention options are all inferior to retaining on Kadri.

The only consideration is if we are getting enough value back. If the acquiring team is sending a spare parts package then they can have Kadri at $7M. If they are sending a blue chip prospect then that could be worth the 4 retention slots.

Sharangovich can stay on the roster and eat popcorn while helping the team stay above the salary floor.
__________________
Wolven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2026, 01:28 PM   #20352
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

I'm still hearing teams want to buy after the Olympic break and nothing is imminent on the Andersson front. I am not trying to be a buzzkill, just what I have heard.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 21 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 01-11-2026, 01:34 PM   #20353
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
I'm still hearing teams want to buy after the Olympic break and nothing is imminent on the Andersson front. I am not trying to be a buzzkill, just what I have heard.
I feared this would happen. No team wants to acquire a player with a potential season-ending injury.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2026, 01:37 PM   #20354
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
I feared this would happen. No team wants to acquire a player with a potential season-ending injury.
Conroy only has to say “I’m trading him before the break, best offers now or he’s going elsewhere”.

Only needs one solid offer.

I imagine the extension is the biggest dealio, which undoubtedly takes a few days to sort out - there’s a lot to sort out.

Conroy controls the asset ultimately, and it’s the asset everyone wants.
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 01-11-2026, 01:38 PM   #20355
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
I feared this would happen. No team wants to acquire a player with a potential season-ending injury.
That logic is nonsense. He could be injured the day after they acquire him just as easily.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2026, 01:50 PM   #20356
Groot
First Line Centre
 
Groot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose View Post
That logic is nonsense. He could be injured the day after they acquire him just as easily.
Its not just Andersson that could get injured. Take Detroit for example, they have Seider, Raymond and Larkin all playing in the Olympics. If anyone of them got injured at the Olmypics, it would leave a big hole on the team. Give up a 1st and high-prospect, just to see an injury (or two) to a major player derail playoff hopes.

Then add in that when you look at the standings right now, how many teams are playoff locks? 3 in the West? It was either Sec or Royle that said teams in the East want to create separation, which makes sense as 8 points (with the top team having played 2-3 more games) is the difference between leading a division and missing playoffs.
Groot is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Groot For This Useful Post:
Old 01-11-2026, 01:53 PM   #20357
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gvitaly View Post
Sharangovich
Why would you retent for a mid round pick?
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2026, 01:55 PM   #20358
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Groot View Post
Its not just Andersson that could get injured. Take Detroit for example, they have Seider, Raymond and Larkin all playing in the Olympics. If anyone of them got injured at the Olmypics, it would leave a big hole on the team. Give up a 1st and high-prospect, just to see an injury (or two) to a major player derail playoff hopes.

Then add in that when you look at the standings right now, how many teams are playoff locks? 3 in the West? It was either Sec or Royle that said teams in the East want to create separation, which makes sense as 8 points (with the top team having played 2-3 more games) is the difference between leading a division and missing playoffs.
They could just as easily get injured in NHL games now as well....im not sure i understand this panic to get a deal done pre-olympic because injuries might happen there.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-11-2026, 01:55 PM   #20359
dustyanddaflames
Powerplay Quarterback
 
dustyanddaflames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose View Post
That logic is nonsense. He could be injured the day after they acquire him just as easily.
I’d guess that stance may differ if a) rental or b) long term contract signed?

Last edited by dustyanddaflames; 01-11-2026 at 01:58 PM.
dustyanddaflames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2026, 01:56 PM   #20360
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose View Post
That logic is nonsense. He could be injured the day after they acquire him just as easily.
Takes two to tango. If a team is reluctant to pull the trigger, then the seller sometimes has to wait. We don't know if there are multiple teams sharing then same sentiment, or if it is only a couple. Hopefully we can get a buyer that is serious to lock it in asap. Still a few weeks before the Olympic break.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ForeverFlameFan For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:48 AM.

Calgary Flames
2025-26






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy