Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-27-2025, 10:21 AM   #81
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
I hurt my Iginla extension falling on the ice one time. Now my wrist shot is completely gone.
I fell on my Iginla extension once. My wife wasn't happy.
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2025, 10:24 AM   #82
IamNotKenKing
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames1217 View Post
I know people have been ragging on the term but aren't the 2 to 3 year deals standard practice when it comes to GMs around the league ?
Yes. But even though the Flames did pretty much what every other team does, and what most fans appear to have wanted, we are still required to bitch and moan because it was not done in precisely the way we wanted it, and precisely when we wanted it...
IamNotKenKing is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to IamNotKenKing For This Useful Post:
Old 11-27-2025, 10:25 AM   #83
Inferno
Franchise Player
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Pas, MB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames1217 View Post
I know people have been ragging on the term but aren't the 2 to 3 year deals standard practice when it comes to GMs around the league ?
What ChatGPT told me:

Inferno is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Inferno For This Useful Post:
Old 11-27-2025, 10:29 AM   #84
howard_the_duck
Franchise Player
 
howard_the_duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
If it really is a two year deal, and that term is organization driven…it’s so bizarre.

That’s just the 2026/2027 season before he goes right back to being a “lame duck” situation.

That’s just a straight up weird extension length.
I actually have no issue with shorter term extensions, especially at this stage of the rebuild.

Have Conroy go prove he can steward this next phase of the rebuild and then maybe a longer, more lucrative contract extension to see this through.

Having multiple salaries on payroll for incoming/outgoing GMs would infuriate me as an owner, so just play it safe until you're totally set on the person for the long haul.
howard_the_duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2025, 10:32 AM   #85
Iginla
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Iginla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Exp:
Default

I am happy for Craig and the Flames organization.
Iginla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2025, 10:33 AM   #86
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by howard_the_duck View Post
I actually have no issue with shorter term extensions, especially at this stage of the rebuild.

Have Conroy go prove he can steward this next phase of the rebuild and then maybe a longer, more lucrative contract extension to see this through.

Having multiple salaries on payroll for incoming/outgoing GMs would infuriate me as an owner, so just play it safe until you're totally set on the person for the long haul.
As long as the mandate is not unrealistic that will result in Conroy trying to fast track the rebuild to try and save his own job.

Barring a typical flames bounce back season where they are competitive next year I can’t see this team challenging for a playoff spot in the next 3 years.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-27-2025, 10:33 AM   #87
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamNotKenKing View Post
Yes. But even though the Flames did pretty much what every other team does, and what most fans appear to have wanted, we are still required to bitch and moan because it was not done in precisely the way we wanted it, and precisely when we wanted it...
To be fair it was pretty fun watching the “complain about anything” folk work their magic in such a short time frame though. Usually you have to wait months or years between them complaining about not getting what they want and then complaining about getting it. This was only days!
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Old 11-27-2025, 10:34 AM   #88
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
As long as the mandate is not unrealistic that will result in Conroy trying to fast track the rebuild to try and save his own job.

Barring a typical flames bounce back season where they are competitive next year I can’t see this team challenging for a playoff spot in the next 3 years.
Yeah this is my take too.

I'd rather have more job certainty and a longer extension in the rebuild phase of this. That way there is no incentive to make short term decisions to save a job, and more incentive for ownership to remain patient.

I'd rather go to more of the 2 year extensions when you are in a contention window, time to make progress or we bring in a different leader.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2025, 10:44 AM   #89
NewFan
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Thinking about current team situation, I think 4-5 year deal would be a good term. Give him 2-3 years to build his team core and 2 year to compete for the playoffs.
If there's is no result after 5 year, it would be our retool season as our current young players get old and expensive.

Last edited by NewFan; 11-27-2025 at 10:47 AM.
NewFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2025, 10:51 AM   #90
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamNotKenKing View Post
Yes. But even though the Flames did pretty much what every other team does, and what most fans appear to have wanted, we are still required to bitch and moan because it was not done in precisely the way we wanted it, and precisely when we wanted it...
I don’t think it is the norm to lame duck a GM like the flames have done with Conroy and what they did with Treliving. Montreal just gave 5 year extensions to Gorton and Hughes.

The average is 3 years typically and the Flames went lighter.

Fans are upset at the organization because it has been one of the most mediocre programs in the league for 20 years. The way the flames have conducted themselves over the years has fueled these narratives and why the fanbase is reacting this way.

Listening to the post game last night. Pat has said he has never remembered a time covering the team where there has been such a strong push from the fans for a different direction.

Ultimately I think we will all be pleased by seasons end by the moves as I want to remain optimistic we will see more than Andersson moved and we will get that top 5 pick. The messaging from the team has just been sloppy as pointed out by the insiders like Friedman and Seravalli
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2025, 10:55 AM   #91
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
I don’t think it is the norm to lame duck a GM like the flames have done with Conroy and what they did with Treliving. Montreal just gave 5 year extensions to Gorton and Hughes.

The average is 3 years typically and the Flames went lighter.

Fans are upset at the organization because it has been one of the most mediocre programs in the league for 20 years. The way the flames have conducted themselves over the years has fueled these narratives and why the fanbase is reacting this way.

Listening to the post game last night. Pat has said he has never remembered a time covering the team where there has been such a strong push from the fans for a different direction.

Ultimately I think we will all be pleased by seasons end by the moves as I want to remain optimistic we will see more than Andersson moved and we will get that top 5 pick. The messaging from the team has just been sloppy as pointed out by the insiders like Friedman and Seravalli
Conroy wasn’t really a lame duck GM this year if they already had the extension in the drawer. The only reason it even popped as an issue was because of that terrible Maloney interview
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2025, 10:58 AM   #92
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
Conroy wasn’t really a lame duck GM this year if they already had the extension in the drawer. The only reason it even popped as an issue was because of that terrible Maloney interview
Yes hopefully that is the case. Why not announce it before the season when the slate is clean? I don’t think they had a deal done right away and entered the season with it being open. Maybe if the team was in a better spot he would have got the third year?
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2025, 11:04 AM   #93
PaperBagger'14
Franchise Player
 
PaperBagger'14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Cowtown
Exp:
Default

I hope this extension also makes Conny the POHO. Then promote Huska to GM next year and bring in a coach with a proven track record and PP success like Gulutzan.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by puckhog View Post
Everyone who disagrees with you is stupid
PaperBagger'14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2025, 11:59 AM   #94
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Yes hopefully that is the case. Why not announce it before the season when the slate is clean? I don’t think they had a deal done right away and entered the season with it being open. Maybe if the team was in a better spot he would have got the third year?
There are two scenarios, one where Conroy and/or the Flames were uncertain or one where there was an agreement made that just had to be officially done. Seems like the latter to me as the uncertainty from either party would have increased into this poor start. You can read it negatively if you want but to me it implies the trust is there between Conroy and the Flames.
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2025, 12:04 PM   #95
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
There are two scenarios, one where Conroy and/or the Flames were uncertain or one where there was an agreement made that just had to be officially done. Seems like the latter to me as the uncertainty from either party would have increased into this poor start. You can read it negatively if you want but to me it implies the trust is there between Conroy and the Flames.
I am just going off history. I asked Burke the same question at a Luncheon he spoke at in 2017 when Treliving was a pending free agent GM why they hadn’t signed him but they did get that deal done as well which is pretty much what Burke had alluded to when answering the question. When Treliving left in 2023 his contract lapsed. It is not out of the norm for the flames to take this approach.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2025, 12:06 PM   #96
Burning Beard
#1 Goaltender
 
Burning Beard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Exp:
Default

My god now we have moved onto the contract is too short. Hard to keep up with the latest upsets.
Burning Beard is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Burning Beard For This Useful Post:
Old 11-27-2025, 12:09 PM   #97
UKflames
Powerplay Quarterback
 
UKflames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: England
Exp:
Default

Posting before reading, so this may have already been covered.

Whilst i'm happy that the Conroy extension seems to be pretty much done, the rumoured 2 years worries me.

To me 2 years sounds like CC is being set up to do all of the dirty work, selling off vets, drafting at the top of the draft after poor seasons, then taking the fall for those poor seasons. Another GM comes in and reaps the reward for Conroy's work.

I might be feeling paranoid after the recent Maloney debacle, but I would have preffered a longer extension.
UKflames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2025, 12:35 PM   #98
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burning Beard View Post
My god now we have moved onto the contract is too short. Hard to keep up with the latest upsets.
On today's episode of Insignificant Things the Masses Are Complaining About...
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2025, 12:36 PM   #99
Yeah_Baby
Franchise Player
 
Yeah_Baby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: still in edmonton
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UKflames View Post
Posting before reading, so this may have already been covered.

Whilst i'm happy that the Conroy extension seems to be pretty much done, the rumoured 2 years worries me.

To me 2 years sounds like CC is being set up to do all of the dirty work, selling off vets, drafting at the top of the draft after poor seasons, then taking the fall for those poor seasons. Another GM comes in and reaps the reward for Conroy's work.

I might be feeling paranoid after the recent Maloney debacle, but I would have preffered a longer extension.

It's a pretty standard length for GM contracts these days it seems.
__________________
"Nothing Matters. Nobody Cares. We're all going to die."
- Devin Cooley
Yeah_Baby is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Yeah_Baby For This Useful Post:
Old 11-27-2025, 12:39 PM   #100
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeah_Baby View Post
It's a pretty standard length for GM contracts these days it seems.
Who else signed a 2 year deal?
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:20 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy