Charlie Kirk Assassination Thread

[DownInFlames]

Originally Posted by Drak

No one here thinks you should murder anyone for an opposing viewpoint. You continue to just make #### up.

He's assuming anyone who is saying Kirk being removed from the political chess board is a good thing agrees with the method of removal, aka "the ends justify the means".


It's more like when an obviously angry dad kills the pedophile who molested their kid. You can be against vigilante justice while shedding no tears for the deceased.


I believe Kirk's shooter should face justice, and feel that the world, on the whole, is a better place without him spreading his hateful message.


Goriders, I hope you can see the logic in this.

[GreenLantern2814]

Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache

In terms of civil war, should it occur in this time, if the military is assigned to a side then does the other side have a chance of winning?

Of course. Probably Moreso - the military is not going to be unified, and it’s not built to hold the United States under martial law.

The US could not hold Afghanistan, it could not hold Iraq, it certainly couldn’t hold Canada, and has no chance of holding itself.

[CorsiHockeyLeague]

Originally Posted by DownInFlames

Goriders, I hope you can see the logic in this.

He obviously can't, given that this has been explained at least a dozen times at this point and he keeps posting exactly the same thing.

[HOOT]

Originally Posted by Goriders

Think the point people are trying to make is that you can’t murder people because you disagree with their viewpoint. But that’s where we’ve gotten to as a society.

Doubt it will end well.

Siri: when was Lincoln assassinated and why?

[Cecil Terwilliger]

Hey look someone wrote an article about Comixzone and Language

Charlie Kirk's allies warn Americans: Mourn him properly or else

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/cha...se-2025-09-13/

[Locke]

Originally Posted by HOOT

Siri: when was Lincoln assassinated and why?

The play was so bad he muttered "kill me" under his breath and someone took him seriously.

[Blaster86]

Originally Posted by Language

Cool man. You keep calling everyone you don’t agree with a fascist and a Nazi. I’m sure you’re going to continue to make things safer.

Not everyone I disagree with is a fascist or a Nazi. For instance, a large majority of this forum cheers for the wrong hockey team and I disagree with that choice, but I don't think any of them are Fascist or Nazis for that choice. There are many posters on this board that think Jose Berrios is a decent pitcher, but none of them are facist or nazis. The ones who say and do fascist and Nazi things, support fascist or Nazi ideals or agree with fascist and nazi mouth pieces will usually be labeled as such though

Originally Posted by Language

Did you even read what I wrote? I never said it was a liberal issue. I said both sides using that rhetoric is dangerous and needs to be toned down. Learn to read.

Yes, both sides are a problem. "Feed the homeless!" "Wipe Education debt!" "Deport every immigrant!" "Make homosexuality illegal!" They're all very similar battle cries and planks of each platform.

You picked the name "Language" and seem to have a very hard time understanding the seriousness of it.

[GreenLantern2814]

Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger

Hey look someone wrote an article about Comixzone and Language



https://www.reuters.com/world/us/cha...se-2025-09-13/

What a bunch of losers.

Just say when.

[TheScorpion]

I feel the same way about Charlie Kirk's death as he did about the deaths of children in school shootings.

[PepsiFree]

What are the chances every single “people not mourning him are evil!” poster also happens to have shared some of Kirk’s most hateful views or wished death on innocent people?

Like batting 1.000 is extremely impressive. It certainly takes a certain kind of bigot with zero self awareness and I’m impressed we even have a handful.

[bettercallbettman]

He was a mouthpiece who put himself at risk. Nobody deserves to die, but around here people just seem fine about the assassination given their different views from him.

[TherapyforGlencross]

The idea of outing people, and specifically, banning them from all social media and removing their drivers license is a slippery slippery slope.

I condemn the Kirk murder, horrific, awful, and the perpetrator should face his penalty. However…

Will pro-Kirk apologists accept that what is being proposed is extremely anti-democratic and dangerous?

So what, if someone doesn’t condone Putin’s eventual death, where’s the line?

This is the biggest reason why this murder will have massive repercussions, especially with the current administration during the wheel.

[Language]

Originally Posted by Blaster86

Not everyone I disagree with is a fascist or a Nazi. For instance, a large majority of this forum cheers for the wrong hockey team and I disagree with that choice, but I don't think any of them are Fascist or Nazis for that choice. There are many posters on this board that think Jose Berrios is a decent pitcher, but none of them are facist or nazis. The ones who say and do fascist and Nazi things, support fascist or Nazi ideals or agree with fascist and nazi mouth pieces will usually be labeled as such though



Yes, both sides are a problem. "Feed the homeless!" "Wipe Education debt!" "Deport every immigrant!" "Make homosexuality illegal!" They're all very similar battle cries and planks of each platform.

You picked the name "Language" and seem to have a very hard time understanding the seriousness of it.

lol, I do understand the seriousness of it, that’s why my suggestion was to stop labeling people as fascists and nazis. Meanwhile, some of you have no problem throwing those words around so loosely.

Disagreement with your opinion = fascism

Who are the intolerant ones now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[btimbit]

Originally Posted by PepsiFree

What are the chances every single “people not mourning him are evil!” poster also happens to have shared some of Kirk’s most hateful views or wished death on innocent people?

Like batting 1.000 is extremely impressive. It certainly takes a certain kind of bigot with zero self awareness and I’m impressed we even have a handful.

"You just don't like opposing political views" they shout, while internally struggling with the fact that what they agree with is actually Nazi ideology.

"You just label anything you don't like as Fascist" while not having the capacity to understand what the word even means and that it absolutely does apply here.

I don't have the energy to keep doing this on this topic. I've already made a dozen posts in the other thread about it. Yet here we have one guy trolling and a few more intentionally missing the point to try and stay on their perceived shaky moral high ground shouting at everyone for not properly mourning a neo-nazi.

The one thing I'll repeat is one I've repeated many times already: STOP normalizing extreme fascist beliefs as simply being "different viewpoints"

[GreenLantern2814]

Originally Posted by Language

lol, I do understand the seriousness of it, that’s why my suggestion was to stop labeling people as fascists and nazis. Meanwhile, some of you have no problem throwing those words around so loosely.

Disagreement with your opinion = fascism

Who are the intolerant ones now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So define fascism for the class, and let us see if Charlie fit the description.

[bettercallbettman]

"To my friend Charlie Kirk, rest now, brother. We have the watch, and I'll see you in Valhalla." - Kash Patel


Oh, come on... Valhalla? Really? This is next-level cringe.

[DeluxeMoustache]

Originally Posted by TherapyforGlencross

The idea of outing people, and specifically, banning them from all social media and removing their drivers license is a slippery slippery slope.

I condone the Kirk murder, horrific, awful, and the perpetrator should face his penalty. However…

Will pro-Kirk apologists accept that what is being proposed is extremely anti-democratic and dangerous?

So what, if someone doesn’t condone Putin’s eventual death, where’s the line?

This is the biggest reason why this murder will have massive repercussions, especially with the current administration during the wheel.

Based on context I think you were looking for the word ‘condemn’

[KelVarnsen]

Originally Posted by Language

lol, I do understand the seriousness of it, that’s why my suggestion was to stop labeling people as fascists and nazis. Meanwhile, some of you have no problem throwing those words around so loosely.

Disagreement with your opinion = fascism

Who are the intolerant ones now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I’m just saying that Nazis support genocide

[DeluxeMoustache]

Originally Posted by Language

lol, I do understand the seriousness of it, that’s why my suggestion was to stop labeling people as fascists and nazis. Meanwhile, some of you have no problem throwing those words around so loosely.

Disagreement with your opinion = fascism

Who are the intolerant ones now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Literally nobody is saying this

I have seen posters describing people who voice and promote fascist ideas as fascist

It is simple. Get yourself familiar with the meaning and characteristics of fascism. Compare behaviours to determine consistency. Apply the term

[Cali Panthers Fan]

Originally Posted by Language

lol, I do understand the seriousness of it, that’s why my suggestion was to stop labeling people as fascists and nazis. Meanwhile, some of you have no problem throwing those words around so loosely.

Disagreement with your opinion = fascism

Who are the intolerant ones now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from the right wing playbook. I see you.

No brotha....for the thousandth time in the past few days. We call people fascists because they espouse fascism and fascist policies. They actively are calling for fascist government and are encouraging others to do so. It is not merely about disagreement, although we do disagree with fascism. I can disagree with a lot of people about the quality of Taylor Swift's music (they think she's great, I think she's terrible), but that doesn't make them fascists.

Or...a more apt example: I can adamantly disagree with Trump's policy to no longer monitor greenhouse gas emissions through the EPA because it's a dumb ####ing idea that is anti-science. That doesn't make him a fascist, it just makes him stupid.

However.

There are a bunch of other things that make him fascist adjacent if not outright fascist. There's plenty to dive into on that front, and that why he's not just a bad president, he's a danger to the state.

Kirk was a loyal foot solider for Trump, and used the cover of "open debate" and "free speech" to turn a lot of America's youth into either outright fascists, or fascist sympathizers.

Now whether you believe these people are full out Nazi's or not, they are literally using the Nazi playbook (Hitler Youth indoctrination/Kirk and his ilk on social media; Brown Shirts/ICE to intimidate the non-Americans AKA brown people who are trying to tear this country apart by replacing the true Americans aka white people).

If you fail to recognize the same patterns and playbooks, then you're being intentionally obtuse. Read a book.