Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-08-2025, 02:23 PM   #14341
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

I would be happy to trade quite a lot to get Misa. More than most on this board, in fact. I see an opportunity to grab quality that is only available by tanking - I will trade a lot of quantity. Flames are damn amazing at drafting quantity (and quality for position - it is just near impossible to draft a #1 center without a high pick). It will cost a lot - it will cost a significant 'over-payment'. If the Flames had the #2 overall pick, would anyone be happy with a 'fair deal' for quantity vs quality? I know I would be livid. It has to be an over-payment.



18th + Florida
Andersson (or probably the assets from an Andersson trade to another club)
Choice of prospect other than Parekh and Wolf
Zary


That's essentially 5 first round picks' worth. Does that get it done?



I like Misa a lot. I think he will be the real deal, and fairly similar to Celebrini overall. Someone that can be good on both sides of the puck. He already has chemistry with Parekh, so that's a bonus. He was also by far an engine for the team, not a bystander or even someone who is a part of a really good top line (like Dvorak, for instance). He led the team in points with 134 in 65 games. Parekh was second with 107 in 61. Big drop down to an undrafted 19 year old who had 83 in 65. Great skater, very cerebral, makes plays at speed, and probably could have had even more points if he didn't bother as much on the defensive side of the puck. That's just my opinion though. I am always ok with giving up a lot of quantity for top-quality.



Spine of the team becomes Misa-Parekh -Wolf. That's pretty good. Flames still have a lot of pieces to build around those three - and who knows, maybe the quantity pushes the Flames into the McKenna sweeptstakes. Mckenna-Misa-Parekh-Wolf probably wins a cup or two, especially since Calgary is pretty good at finding players in a draft.


As for Rossi - I would pass. The assets that they would want I would rather spend at the draft. Yes, he put up a good amount of points, but he is an undersized 2nd line center. i don't think he is a first. I would rather draft Reshny or someone else in that area of the draft instead. This team needs the bullets to hit on a center that turns into a #1 center or this rebuild might end up like more of the same we have seen in the last decade - not much playoff success. The goal shouldn't be to become a playoff team. it should be to become a contender - a consistent contender. I see acquiring Rossi as helping the Flames become a playoff team, but not a contender. I know I am not articulating this well enough, but I really see him as a #2 center, or even convert him to a top line winger. I don't see him as a top-line center. He will get 70points as one, but I don't think he will be able to push the pace out there against the league's top shutdown players, or do well matched-up against the league's top lines in a 'strength-vs-strength' situation.


Flames are FLUSH with quantity in the 2nd line down. Zary, Coronato, Klapka, Honzek, Frost, Farabee, Battaglia, Gridin, Bahsa, Misa, Suniev, Stromgren, Kerins - yes, some of these guys won't make it, and most will obviously not be as good as Rossi is. I would just rather the Flames use their picks on guys who they think can be #1 centers either through the draft or through trade, rather than using assets to acquire more depth, even if that depth is better than what they may have.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
Old 05-08-2025, 02:28 PM   #14342
OILFAN #81
Everyone's Favorite Oilfan!
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Jose, California
Exp:
Default

Apparently the team is Nashville. Haven’t been told what is offered other than the picks (apparently there is more both ways), but as of now Sharks haven’t made a decision.
OILFAN #81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2025, 02:31 PM   #14343
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias View Post
Just me but I hope they don't spend assets on Rossi, or Bourque, or Mercer. The remaining hole in the depth chart is for a superstar level center, not another mid 6 guy. You don't need to roll 4 lines of 35-40 point players. I guess if you're building the Kraken or Islanders you do
It's a good thing the Flames already have an entire first line of 50-70 points already, and Rossi had 60 points last season.

I also think if Parekh works out, we'll see a boost in all the top PP players' numbers.

The Flames are going to find themselves log jammed with depth picks. Frost, Farabee, Coronato, Zary, Sharangovich, and Klapka all fill depth positions (although Coronato, Zary, and possibly Frost could evolve into something more). With these late firsts, you're far more likely to draft these 35-40 point guys you talk about than you are a Rossi.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to blankall For This Useful Post:
Old 05-08-2025, 02:40 PM   #14344
OILFAN #81
Everyone's Favorite Oilfan!
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Jose, California
Exp:
Default

My last post of the day, have to head back to work. Got confirmation that Nashville is indeed the team that has already tabled an offer. Sharks waiting as more dialogue/teams are anticipated to be interested and apparently it wasn’t enough for them to make it happen already. Nashville is the only offer on the table right now but as mentioned they are expecting more talks.

Cheers CP.
OILFAN #81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2025, 02:50 PM   #14345
Fan69
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Exp:
Flames

Quote:
Originally Posted by OILFAN #81 View Post
My last post of the day, have to head back to work. Got confirmation that Nashville is indeed the team that has already tabled an offer. Sharks waiting as more dialogue/teams are anticipated to be interested and apparently it wasn’t enough for them to make it happen already. Nashville is the only offer on the table right now but as mentioned they are expecting more talks.

Cheers CP.
Only a few teams are flush with picks this draft.
Nashville-sj-chicago-montreal-philly.

All of them have multiple picks in the first three rounds.

Nash could have offered 26-30-35-58-67( might change slightly)
Fan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2025, 02:57 PM   #14346
Monahammer
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Coronato + 18 + Fla 1st+ Mews would be my final offer. I don't think Zary will tilt the scale enough.

Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2025, 03:03 PM   #14347
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Haha, every year nearing the draft its the same ridiculous proposals to move up.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 05-08-2025, 03:04 PM   #14348
MacDaddy77
First Line Centre
 
MacDaddy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Exp:
Default

Coronato is NOT getting traded after signing long term not happening, sends the wrong message.
MacDaddy77 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to MacDaddy77 For This Useful Post:
Old 05-08-2025, 03:08 PM   #14349
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fan69 View Post
Only a few teams are flush with picks this draft.
Nashville-sj-chicago-montreal-philly.

All of them have multiple picks in the first three rounds.

Nash could have offered 26-30-35-58-67( might change slightly)
If I were the sharks I would not bite (no pun). It’s not enticing enough. You’d probably have to start with the first two and give a really good player.
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2025, 03:12 PM   #14350
MacDaddy77
First Line Centre
 
MacDaddy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Exp:
Default

I feel unless 5th overall pick is in play Flames can beat Nashville offer with
Andersson
#22
brzustewicz

Gives them potential 2x top 4 Right side Dmen for the next 7 years and a 1st in return

Not a huge take from Flames prospect pool as we have Mews coming for that RHS Dman
(or Makar in a couple years)
MacDaddy77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2025, 03:16 PM   #14351
Monahammer
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacDaddy77 View Post
Coronato is NOT getting traded after signing long term not happening, sends the wrong message.
Messaging has gotten us literally no where. No one is mad about getting paid 40 million to play hockey in California. It is unlikely to happen, I say again, but that's the type of cost to move up into the top 2 IMO.
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Monahammer For This Useful Post:
Old 05-08-2025, 03:32 PM   #14352
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias View Post
Just me but I hope they don't spend assets on Rossi, or Bourque, or Mercer. The remaining hole in the depth chart is for a superstar level center, not another mid 6 guy. You don't need to roll 4 lines of 35-40 point players. I guess if you're building the Kraken or Islanders you do
Rossi will be an 80 point guy. The guy personally made Jack Quinn an 8th overall pick in junior. Watched him play a lot in junior and he was elite. Suspect he still is, he has put up numbers at every level he has ever played in.

Brayden Point was also way too small, put up numbers at every level. In his D+3 year point put up 40 points in the NHL. In Rossi’s D+4 year he put up 40 points. In Point’s D+4 year he put up 66, in Rossi’s D+5 year he put up 60.

I would much rather have Rossi for what it would likely cost to get him than to go crazy trying to get #2 pick.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Aarongavey For This Useful Post:
Old 05-08-2025, 04:00 PM   #14353
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Nashville has 3 1sts.

I wouldn't be surprised if it's 5 + 26 (Tampa Bay) + 30 (Vegas) for 2.

TBH I think that could make sense for San Jose unless they are sold that Martone or Misa is drastically better than what they could get at 5. Probably all comes down to how they rank the top 5 propsects. My guess is they wanted Schaefer but believe he goes 1st OV to NYI, so if they have Martone, Misa, Hagens, and Frondell all ranked relatively equally...then moving back to 5 doesn't seem that bad.

San Jose would have 5, 26, 28, 30, 33, 53 in that scenario.

Which would give them a lot of assets to be able to move for more immediate help on defense while still adding a high end forward as a prospect.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 05-08-2025, 04:10 PM   #14354
Monahammer
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
Nashville has 3 1sts.

I wouldn't be surprised if it's 5 + 26 (Tampa Bay) + 30 (Vegas) for 2.

TBH I think that could make sense for San Jose unless they are sold that Martone or Misa is drastically better than what they could get at 5. Probably all comes down to how they rank the top 5 propsects. My guess is they wanted Schaefer but believe he goes 1st OV to NYI, so if they have Martone, Misa, Hagens, and Frondell all ranked relatively equally...then moving back to 5 doesn't seem that bad.

San Jose would have 5, 26, 28, 30, 33, 53 in that scenario.

Which would give them a lot of assets to be able to move for more immediate help on defense while still adding a high end forward as a prospect.
Much more likely than us having a sniff at it.

If they are flush with later picks they could potentially be talked into giving one for Andersson. I still don't think he's worth a 1st but there is probably the most likely scenario we could snag one in.

I think Buffalo might be open to trading 9, too. Maybe you let the SJ scenario shake out with Nash, see if we can get another 1st from them in the wake, then see if we can package 18 and one of the others to get to 9.
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2025, 04:11 PM   #14355
Fan69
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
Nashville has 3 1sts.

I wouldn't be surprised if it's 5 + 26 (Tampa Bay) + 30 (Vegas) for 2.

TBH I think that could make sense for San Jose unless they are sold that Martone or Misa is drastically better than what they could get at 5. Probably all comes down to how they rank the top 5 propsects. My guess is they wanted Schaefer but believe he goes 1st OV to NYI, so if they have Martone, Misa, Hagens, and Frondell all ranked relatively equally...then moving back to 5 doesn't seem that bad.

San Jose would have 5, 26, 28, 30, 33, 53 in that scenario.

Which would give them a lot of assets to be able to move for more immediate help on defence while still adding a high end forward as a prospect.
Sj, chicago and philly have that ability as well to make deals and i think most of them will. As i mentioned before they can all offer a first,second, third in a trade, still have picks in all those rounds including top ten.

All of those teams have the assets and motivation to make deals.
Fan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2025, 04:26 PM   #14356
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

2 for 5 + 26 + 30 is similar to 1 for 6 + 22 + 28

Mackinnen >>>> Monahan + Porier + Klimchuk

I know its a different year with different players but I almost always choose quality over quantity
albertGQ is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to albertGQ For This Useful Post:
Old 05-08-2025, 04:35 PM   #14357
Funkhouser
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Funkhouser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MTL
Exp:
Default

PHI gets #2
SJ gets #6, 25 and Bonk

Gets SJ some depth on D and the opportunity to still grab a future top six centre
Funkhouser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2025, 06:19 PM   #14358
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Haha, every year nearing the draft its the same ridiculous proposals to move up.
My favourite were all the Lindholm for 3rd OA proposals
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bonded For This Useful Post:
Old 05-08-2025, 07:38 PM   #14359
Sofa GM
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
That would be the dumbest offersheet ever.

5 years x whatever is the upper limit to 2 1sts, a 2nd, and a 3rd? Different story.
I wouldn’t give that package for Bouchard. Whe signs a big $$$ deal he will disappear. He gets pts because of the glitter twins, complete liability for his team.
Sofa GM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2025, 09:24 PM   #14360
browntrout
Crash and Bang Winger
 
browntrout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

I would give an insane amount to get the 2 nd overall, I think at the end of the day it we cost us Parekh or wolf, san Jose needs quality as well, they don't need more pics.
browntrout is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:11 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy