Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Waiver Result?
Pelletier and Cooley both clear 211 57.34%
Pelletier clears and Cooley is claimed 18 4.89%
Cooley clears and Pelleiter is claimed 110 29.89%
Pelletier and Cooley both get taken 29 7.88%
Voters: 368. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-07-2024, 11:23 AM   #361
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HighLifeMan View Post
Pretty silly to waive Pelletier only to have waiver eligible Coronato start the year as the 13th forward.
Flames are going to have to send someone down when Sharangovich is healthy. Yesterday was probably the safest day to waive Pelletier, since there were many players on waivers. They still have 30 days to send him down. (assuming he clears)
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2024, 11:24 AM   #362
Paulie Walnuts
Franchise Player
 
Paulie Walnuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

We could have just sent down Coronato and kept him. Instead Coronato is a healthy scratch when he should be playing.

A puzzling move.
Paulie Walnuts is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Paulie Walnuts For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2024, 11:26 AM   #363
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
We could have just sent down Coronato and kept him. Instead Coronato is a healthy scratch when he should be playing.

A puzzling move.
I think Geeoff means there is less risk of Pelletier being claimed today than there will be 2-3 weeks from now… when Sharangovich is healthy.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2024, 11:26 AM   #364
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

I would not be surprised if both Pelletier and Coronato are sent down and Schwindt is eating popcorn until Sharangovich is healthy
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Geeoff For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2024, 11:27 AM   #365
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
We could have just sent down Coronato and kept him. Instead Coronato is a healthy scratch when he should be playing.

A puzzling move.
Coronato does not need the ice time to develop though, he can develop with Hanley in the press box.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Aarongavey For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2024, 11:30 AM   #366
HitterD
Powerplay Quarterback
 
HitterD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In my office...is it 5:00 yet???
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
He is battling injuries. Just like Honzek has.

Maybe we should be a little patient before writing him off?
I don’t think this is even a comparable at this point. The 6’3” 19 year old 2023 drafted player that had an injury-filled D+1 season, deserved patience and the benefit of the doubt, and he’s looking like he put in the work this summer and will reap the benefits

The 23 year old, 5’9” Pelletier has had 6 training camps to show he can be an NHL player. At what point are injuries no longer an excuse for his lack of development. He’s either injury prone, or he’s just not an effective enough player for his size, or both. How much more patience should we have Paulie?

If another team wants to give him NHL minutes to develop, have at it, it’s no loss to the Flames at this point when several bigger, stronger and younger wingers have clearly passed him in the Flames Org.
HitterD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2024, 11:32 AM   #367
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Junglist View Post
He was trending just fine until injuries. He made the AHL rookie team in 2021-2022.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
He is battling injuries. Just like Honzek has.

Maybe we should be a little patient before writing him off?
Again, “just fine” is exactly what I’m saying. Nothing special enough to get worked up about. AHL rookie teams are full of guys who go on to do a whole lot of not much.

Nobody is writing him off. He just hasn’t done anything yet. Honzek, on the other hand, is going to play in the NHL at 19, because he came back from injury and actually earned his spot. An “excellent” 23 year old should be able to do the same.
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2024, 11:43 AM   #368
Paulie Walnuts
Franchise Player
 
Paulie Walnuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Again, “just fine” is exactly what I’m saying. Nothing special enough to get worked up about. AHL rookie teams are full of guys who go on to do a whole lot of not much.

Nobody is writing him off. He just hasn’t done anything yet. Honzek, on the other hand, is going to play in the NHL at 19, because he came back from injury and actually earned his spot. An “excellent” 23 year old should be able to do the same.
He is nothing special sure, but the move is still puzzling. Coronato can go down and play and get minutes instead of sitting in the pressbox.

Honzek earned his spot to cover for Sharangovich, and once he is back we can send Honzek back down because he is not a 4th liner or healthy scratch.

So who is the logical player to keep that fits a 4th line spot? He could also be traded for something instead of lost for nothing.
Paulie Walnuts is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2024, 11:44 AM   #369
Paulie Walnuts
Franchise Player
 
Paulie Walnuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HitterD View Post
I don’t think this is even a comparable at this point. The 6’3” 19 year old 2023 drafted player that had an injury-filled D+1 season, deserved patience and the benefit of the doubt, and he’s looking like he put in the work this summer and will reap the benefits

The 23 year old, 5’9” Pelletier has had 6 training camps to show he can be an NHL player. At what point are injuries no longer an excuse for his lack of development. He’s either injury prone, or he’s just not an effective enough player for his size, or both. How much more patience should we have Paulie?

If another team wants to give him NHL minutes to develop, have at it, it’s no loss to the Flames at this point when several bigger, stronger and younger wingers have clearly passed him in the Flames Org.
He was not going to be a top 6 player that's the thing.

Honzek is not a 4th liner, same goes for Coronato. Those guys can be easily sent down and called back up.

Once Sharangovich is healthy, are we going to play him 6-8 minutes on the 4th line and healthy scratch Coronato?
Paulie Walnuts is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2024, 11:47 AM   #370
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

If Honzek performed as a top 6, I bet the Flames are smart to keep him there even when Sharangovich came back

If not, the can send him to the AHL for more development

Coronato is interesting. He has already shown he can performed at the AHL level but not sure what are they doing with him as the 13th
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2024, 11:49 AM   #371
howard_the_duck
#1 Goaltender
 
howard_the_duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
Then he needs to show it.

He hasn't/didn't.

What message does it send to all the other young guys on what it takes/ is required, to make the team?

"Yeah....you were better than him (and dont kid yourself, every guy in that room knows who was or wasnt good through camp) but he was a 1st rd pick 5 years ago, so we are just going to gift him your spot"

It would be an asinine way to run things and would wreck that room in a week if it was the norm.

Pelletier and Pelletier alone, is responsible for this situation.

Conroy had no other choice.

I understand the sentiment of setting a cultural precedent and not keeping a player around in favor of others who've outperformed him in camp, but I also think some folks are overvaluing a bad camp as good reason to expose this player.

Training camp is just one of the criteria he should be judged on. His AHL performance has been outstanding so far in his U23 cohort. Injuries have slowed his development at a crucial time in his career. This is a player two short years ago was our most polished forward prospect and we had visions of him playing in the top 6. And he's had all of a whopping 37 NHL games over two seasons, so hardly a proven/finished product.

So you can say tough luck, life's not fair, and he's had ample time to prove himself. If the team was competitive...I'd probably even hold that position.

For the time being, when we're not sniffing the playoffs, I hold an unpopular opinion I guess, but I'm less concerned about the culture of a team where less than a handful of them will be around when we're competitive again. It's important as you start to ramp things back up, but we're not there yet. Easy to say as a fan who's not inside the organization, but my interest is the assets and growing/developing those who might be around when our competitive window re-opens. That would be players under 25, and I'd have even more leniency for high draft pedigree players who've shown flashes of promise.

All this to say, I don't even LOVE Pelletier as a player. His value is almost non-existent as it stands. But I think the franchise could give him some added runway in light of all of the circumstances that have stalled his development to try and re-establish his value, given their first round investment in him. I get setting a culture, but it's not like Pelletier hasn't earned looks based on his broader book of work. Especially when it's aged 30+ veterans taking his roster spot.
howard_the_duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2024, 11:51 AM   #372
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Going in circles here.

Many have said they made the waive decision to keep the player, but get him into a situation where he can rebound.

It's a risk.

But I don't see a better path by keeping him as a healthy scratch and spelling him on the odd game with Lomberg on the fourth line.

This isn't a "how do we get to Monday's deadline without losing any assets?" call.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2024, 11:57 AM   #373
zuluking
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
He is nothing special sure, but the move is still puzzling. Coronato can go down and play and get minutes instead of sitting in the pressbox.

Honzek earned his spot to cover for Sharangovich, and once he is back we can send Honzek back down because he is not a 4th liner or healthy scratch.

So who is the logical player to keep that fits a 4th line spot? He could also be traded for something instead of lost for nothing.
Honzek is a unknown commodity in regular season NHL action. Yes, he did great in the preseason and earned his spot. If he struggles out of the gates, they need a player to step in and play in that spot. So you keep Coronato. It makes sense.

Your 4th line is set to play the game a certain way: energy and chaos. None of those players could or should move up the lineup, so it isn't like you can promote Lomberg or Klapka and then insert generic 4th liner.

I think they work both Honzek and Coronato into games while Sharangovich is out. It's a pretty decent scenario to have. Extra motivation, insurance policy, experience, etc. etc. Defer decisions until Sharangovich returns.
__________________
zk
zuluking is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to zuluking For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2024, 12:00 PM   #374
puffnstuff
Franchise Player
 
puffnstuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: wearing raccoons for boots
Exp:
Default

Well its noon...
puffnstuff is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to puffnstuff For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2024, 12:04 PM   #375
savardandjokinen
son of looooob
 
savardandjokinen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Vegas claims schwindt

Pelletier and Cooley clear
savardandjokinen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2024, 12:04 PM   #376
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Schwindt clamied by Vegas
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2024, 12:04 PM   #377
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puffnstuff View Post
Well its noon...
I am going to laugh if Schwindt gets claimed Pelletier goes through
Bonded is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2024, 12:05 PM   #378
tony-soprano
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Exp:
Default

forever a flame Cole Schwindt
tony-soprano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2024, 12:05 PM   #379
UK flame
Draft Pick
 
UK flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: London
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
I am going to laugh if Schwindt gets claimed Pelletier goes through
Looks like it
UK flame is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to UK flame For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2024, 12:05 PM   #380
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Pelts and Cooley clear
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:28 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy