Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-18-2022, 08:43 PM   #3961
8 Ball
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadianman View Post
What sort of useless crap would you cut?
It would be difficult letting go of the support staff, but I would privatize that. We don’t really need to pay someone 50.00/dollars an hour to spend a week working on an incubator that they send back to the manufacturer to fix anyway. Paying a plumber two weeks to call in a private company to change a diaphragm in a flush valve in the nurses bathroom.
8 Ball is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 8 Ball For This Useful Post:
Old 11-18-2022, 08:54 PM   #3962
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8 Ball View Post
It would be difficult letting go of the support staff, but I would privatize that. We don’t really need to pay someone 50.00/dollars an hour to spend a week working on an incubator that they send back to the manufacturer to fix anyway. Paying a plumber two weeks to call in a private company to change a diaphragm in a flush valve in the nurses bathroom.
Is there enough large companies that can support this at a lower cost while maintaining the ability to have competition between providers and will disruptions when providers change be worth it.

Are the savings going to be real or is the level of service going to be cut to make it appear like it works?

Do we have good evidence that exporting these services has worked?

Which lab services are the lowest cost per test for the province?

I think you need to be careful with privatization of it creates an oligopoly.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2022, 09:08 PM   #3963
Roughneck
#1 Goaltender
 
Roughneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the middle
Exp:
Default

If it's like other deals the provincial government has made over the past 50 years, it will just be a contract to a company of a former government staffer or other crony.
Roughneck is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Roughneck For This Useful Post:
Old 11-19-2022, 03:33 AM   #3964
MoneyGuy
Franchise Player
 
MoneyGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

If this premier is returned and insists on implementing her policies it will cause harm to health care and who knows what else that will take many years or decades to remedy.
MoneyGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2022, 06:33 AM   #3965
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
Is there enough large companies that can support this at a lower cost while maintaining the ability to have competition between providers and will disruptions when providers change be worth it.

Are the savings going to be real or is the level of service going to be cut to make it appear like it works?

Do we have good evidence that exporting these services has worked?

Which lab services are the lowest cost per test for the province?

I think you need to be careful with privatization of it creates an oligopoly.
Let’s find out.
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2022, 06:43 AM   #3966
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
Is there enough large companies that can support this at a lower cost while maintaining the ability to have competition between providers and will disruptions when providers change be worth it.



Are the savings going to be real or is the level of service going to be cut to make it appear like it works?



Do we have good evidence that exporting these services has worked?



Which lab services are the lowest cost per test for the province?



I think you need to be careful with privatization of it creates an oligopoly.
BC privatized lots of support staff to save money and they just ended it as the savings were small but the headaches big
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Street Pharmacist For This Useful Post:
Old 11-19-2022, 07:01 AM   #3967
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
BC privatized lots of support staff to save money and they just ended it as the savings were small but the headaches big
Ya, but free market Alberta will be different. Data isn't important here.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
Old 11-19-2022, 07:43 AM   #3968
Dynamic
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8 Ball View Post
It would be difficult letting go of the support staff, but I would privatize that. We don’t really need to pay someone 50.00/dollars an hour to spend a week working on an incubator that they send back to the manufacturer to fix anyway. Paying a plumber two weeks to call in a private company to change a diaphragm in a flush valve in the nurses bathroom.
I think the part to remember is that this concept that letting support services to essentially be farmed out is NOT going to be some dream utopia of competition that maintains the level of same level of service for a lower cost. It is usually sold to simpleton conservatives as modest savings to start. But over time eventually these private companies will "game the system" as much as they can. Many of these support services are in niche industries with limited competition anyways.

People are expecting it to be like grocery stores where stores selling to the same consumer all are pretty close in price and are highly competitive. In reality it will be like our telecom industry. High prices, terrible service. A few major players that just all collude to bend over the taxpayer anyways.
Dynamic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2022, 07:45 AM   #3969
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
Ya, but free market Alberta will be different. Data isn't important here.
Wages were cut almost in half and pensions lost, which sounds like it should be a savings. However, after a few years the contracts were close to the same cost due to fewer bidders on the contracts as they couldn't find labour for that cheap
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Street Pharmacist For This Useful Post:
Old 11-19-2022, 07:50 AM   #3970
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
Wages were cut almost in half and pensions lost, which sounds like it should be a savings. However, after a few years the contracts were close to the same cost due to fewer bidders on the contracts as they couldn't find labour for that cheap
Ya, I never understood the line of thinking that by adding a layer of profit taking, it will somehow get cheaper without impact.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
Old 11-19-2022, 07:54 AM   #3971
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
Ya, I never understood the line of thinking that by adding a layer of profit taking, it will somehow get cheaper without impact.
It makes sense if you view it from the lens of government wages and inefficiency. But when the sector is this large and the buyer is still government the cost pressures and bureaucracy don't end up making much difference. A purely capitalistic market where the buyer wasn't government may lead to more cost pressures and lower costs, I dunno. But privatization here hurt the workers with little fiscal benefit in the long run
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2022, 08:28 AM   #3972
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho View Post
Let’s find out.
This is the wrong attitude. It’s let’s review the data of the experiments already done in Alberta and other jurisdictions and determine how and where to do it effectively.

Let’s find out does seem to be the conservative approach to privatization.

The problem with let’s find out is that changing process is expensive and hard to undo. You eliminate the government capacity to execute work. An example being a government option in telecom. We pay more because the government doesn’t provide competition and there is no real cost effective way to undo it.

Last edited by GGG; 11-19-2022 at 08:41 AM.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GGG For This Useful Post:
Old 11-19-2022, 08:35 AM   #3973
calgarygeologist
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
Ya, but free market Alberta will be different. Data isn't important here.
Trudeau has promised a large pool of new immigrants so between that and the TFW programs it should be easy to staff a contracted company of support staff for cheap.
calgarygeologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2022, 08:46 AM   #3974
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist View Post
Trudeau has promised a large pool of new immigrants so between that and the TFW programs it should be easy to staff a contracted company of support staff for cheap.
And it'd be cheaper still if the government just hired them. How does hiring workers, and then building a company needing extra staff to manage those workers, and then taking a profit from it result in cheaper costs?

Look at the costs Nova Scotia has, and they don't have a choice now:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-...otia-1.6654186

Last edited by Fuzz; 11-19-2022 at 08:50 AM.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2022, 09:27 AM   #3975
Yikes
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
Ya, but free market Alberta will be different. Data isn't important here.

Haha...classic.
Yikes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2022, 09:28 AM   #3976
Yikes
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
Ya, I never understood the line of thinking that by adding a layer of profit taking, it will somehow get cheaper without impact.

Classic II...you are on a roll.
Yikes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2022, 10:07 AM   #3977
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/user/status/1593957131249647616

Pretty bang on.
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2022, 10:13 AM   #3978
Yikes
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho View Post

Don't know about any of this but I for one am pretty thankful for the system we have. Our little to zero cost to me health care system has been looking after me since I was a little guy and I have zero complaints.
Yikes is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Yikes For This Useful Post:
Old 11-19-2022, 10:18 AM   #3979
PsYcNeT
Franchise Player
 
PsYcNeT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Marseilles Of The Prairies
Exp:
Default

Pretty telling that the only people who push for private health options are the rich.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Settle down there, Temple Grandin.
PsYcNeT is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PsYcNeT For This Useful Post:
Old 11-19-2022, 10:21 AM   #3980
Dynamic
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho View Post
Forgive my ignorance but who is Dusty Rose? From the looks of his followers he is some loser oil baron of some sort.

People who spew this polarizing garbage need to be shot into the sun. If you look at Canadian universal healthcare as a failure and "the worst" you are literally telling the world that you know nothing.
Dynamic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dynamic For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:16 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy