Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-26-2019, 01:30 PM   #13381
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Ok, so Steinberg brought up the Zucker deal again just now on the Fan. His info suggests that the Wild are more interested in revisiting this than the Flames are. He then goes on to suggest the Flames should still do the deal (with a 1st round pick involved).

My question would be, if the Wild want this more than the Flames, why would the Flames still include a 1st?
Toonage is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Toonage For This Useful Post:
Old 04-26-2019, 01:33 PM   #13382
Mayo
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers View Post
100%

I want players who haven’t won the cup yet. Or at least haven’t won multiple.
Ya we need a guy who is pent up, a guy who has been getting blue balled in the playoffs the last few years. Is there anyone that made Stanley Cup finals two years in a row, big body, perennial 20 goal scorer?
Mayo is offline  
Old 04-26-2019, 01:35 PM   #13383
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
Ok, so Steinberg brought up the Zucker deal again just now on the Fan. His info suggests that the Wild are more interested in revisiting this than the Flames are. He then goes on to suggest the Flames should still do the deal (with a 1st round pick involved).

My question would be, if the Wild want this more than the Flames, why would the Flames still include a 1st?
Give them Neal small salary retained.
Yoho is offline  
Old 04-26-2019, 01:36 PM   #13384
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Lol @Minnesota. Perhaps you should have filed your paperwork on time at the deadline. Ya blew it!

I'd would however move Janko and Frolik for Zucker. Tilts the cap savings our way and opens up a center spot for a new center.

Edit: Add Eriksson Ek. I think he could use a new home.

Last edited by dammage79; 04-26-2019 at 01:38 PM.
dammage79 is online now  
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-26-2019, 01:37 PM   #13385
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
Ok, so Steinberg brought up the Zucker deal again just now on the Fan. His info suggests that the Wild are more interested in revisiting this than the Flames are. He then goes on to suggest the Flames should still do the deal (with a 1st round pick involved).

My question would be, if the Wild want this more than the Flames, why would the Flames still include a 1st?
Based on where the Flames are in their development, the 1st round pick should absolutely be in play to improve the team now. Whatever NHL player that pick could help acquire is likely to be more helpful to the goal of a Stanley Cup than the 26th pick of the draft, who will likely not be ready to make an impact for two years, if not more.

I don't know that Zucker is the guy though. I really felt the Flames dodged a bullet with that deal not going through.

I also don't quite understand how Frolik has managed to fall so far out of favor with Peters - he's arguably the second-best UFA the team has ever signed after Hudler, and I don't think there's ever been a time during his four years with the club that he hasn't earned his money. Which is more than you can say for a lot of UFAs this team has signed this decade.
GreenLantern2814 is offline  
Old 04-26-2019, 01:40 PM   #13386
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayo View Post
Ya we need a guy who is pent up, a guy who has been getting blue balled in the playoffs the last few years. Is there anyone that made Stanley Cup finals two years in a row, big body, perennial 20 goal scorer?
Ugh.... now you make me hate the idea. Because that’s Neal.
Scroopy Noopers is online now  
Old 04-26-2019, 01:45 PM   #13387
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers View Post
Ugh.... now you make me hate the idea. Because that’s Neal.
I'm sorry to have to do this to you.

GreenLantern2814 is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-26-2019, 01:47 PM   #13388
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
Based on where the Flames are in their development, the 1st round pick should absolutely be in play to improve the team now. Whatever NHL player that pick could help acquire is likely to be more helpful to the goal of a Stanley Cup than the 26th pick of the draft, who will likely not be ready to make an impact for two years, if not more.

I don't know that Zucker is the guy though. I really felt the Flames dodged a bullet with that deal not going through.

I also don't quite understand how Frolik has managed to fall so far out of favor with Peters - he's arguably the second-best UFA the team has ever signed after Hudler, and I don't think there's ever been a time during his four years with the club that he hasn't earned his money. Which is more than you can say for a lot of UFAs this team has signed this decade.
I'm pretty much with you on this. While I'd be fine with Zucker on this team I don't like the idea of spending a 1st in that deal. I agree it should be in play but I think it should be spent elsewhere.
Toonage is offline  
Old 04-26-2019, 01:52 PM   #13389
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
I'm pretty much with you on this. While I'd be fine with Zucker on this team I don't like the idea of spending a 1st in that deal. I agree it should be in play but I think it should be spent elsewhere.
As long as we're dealing with the Wild, there's one player on their roster I'd for sure give up the 1st for, and that's Devan Dubnyk.
GreenLantern2814 is offline  
Old 04-26-2019, 01:53 PM   #13390
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
I'm sorry to have to do this to you.

I felt it immediately as I posted it....

Double ugh.
Scroopy Noopers is online now  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Scroopy Noopers For This Useful Post:
Old 04-26-2019, 01:55 PM   #13391
tkflames
First Line Centre
 
tkflames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
I'm pretty much with you on this. While I'd be fine with Zucker on this team I don't like the idea of spending a 1st in that deal. I agree it should be in play but I think it should be spent elsewhere.
I'd be ok with the first if they take Neal or in the original deal if we get back a 2nd. Its basically a trade down that way.
__________________
Go Flames Go
tkflames is offline  
Old 04-26-2019, 01:57 PM   #13392
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tkflames View Post
I'd be ok with the first if they take Neal or in the original deal if we get back a 2nd. Its basically a trade down that way.
Blockbuster time:

Calgary 1st
Frolik
Jankowski
Neal

for

Dubnyk
Zucker
GreenLantern2814 is offline  
Old 04-26-2019, 02:03 PM   #13393
SeanCharles
First Line Centre
 
SeanCharles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Gaudreau, Monahan, Tkachuk, Backlund, Bennett, Mangiapane, Dube, Jankowski, Neal, Frolik and Zucker.

All left handed shots..

The idea of trading for more left handed 2nd/3rd line forwards really bugs me Haha, even if you trade one or two out for another.

It's just like the small group of ppl that would rather trade Hamonic instead of Brodie. I just dont get it.
SeanCharles is offline  
Old 04-26-2019, 02:08 PM   #13394
Fan in Exile
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

Okay, so maybe Malkin wouldn’t waive to come to the Flames but if he did, I think it would signal that he is hungry to show he can win without Sid.

Would be a risky but exciting deal.
Fan in Exile is offline  
Old 04-26-2019, 02:23 PM   #13395
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I suggested a revisit to the Zucker trade on my show a few weeks ago. Add something to get Dubnyk included in the deal.

Frolik + pick(s) of some kind + Gillies + something like Jankowski for Zucker + Dubnyk.



Similarly, a Brodie + something for Kadri trade makes sense for both sides.

That would set the team up

Gaudreau-Monahan-Zucker
Tkachuk-Kadri-Lindholm
Bennett-Backlund-Neal/Dube
Mangiapane-Ryan-Hathaway

I think that balances things out a lot better overall.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline  
Old 04-26-2019, 02:30 PM   #13396
SportsJunky
Uncle Chester
 
SportsJunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

Not saying the bad feelings still exist but Kadri gave Gio the throat slash gesture a couple of years ago.
SportsJunky is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to SportsJunky For This Useful Post:
Old 04-26-2019, 02:35 PM   #13397
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SportsJunky View Post
Not saying the bad feelings still exist but Kadri gave Gio the throat slash gesture a couple of years ago.
I cannot think of any clean hit that looked like it hurt as much as this clean hit does.
GreenLantern2814 is offline  
Old 04-26-2019, 03:01 PM   #13398
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken View Post
Two centre contracts I find interesting are Derek stepan and Ryan getzlaf.

Both guys have actual salaries less than their cap hits in either one or both of their remaining years.

Getzlaf gets paid 6 million in his final year, meaning if Anaheim retained 2 million of his cap hit, they wouldn't actually have to pay any money out.

The same with stepan at about 1.5

Conceivably you move backlund and a pick for getzlaf with 2.25 retained and have essentially the same salary structure as you do with Backlund but with less term obligation and a significantly different look in your forward group.

I think it makes a lot of sense.
The Ducks are not moving Getzlaf to a division rival plus retaining salary for Backlund. It makes no sense for them.
dissentowner is offline  
Old 04-26-2019, 03:03 PM   #13399
atb
First Line Centre
 
atb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
I suggested a revisit to the Zucker trade on my show a few weeks ago. Add something to get Dubnyk included in the deal.

Frolik + pick(s) of some kind + Gillies + something like Jankowski for Zucker + Dubnyk.



Similarly, a Brodie + something for Kadri trade makes sense for both sides.

That would set the team up

Gaudreau-Monahan-Zucker
Tkachuk-Kadri-Lindholm
Bennett-Backlund-Neal/Dube
Mangiapane-Ryan-Hathaway

I think that balances things out a lot better overall.
Agreed, Brodie+ for Kadri seems to make pretty good sense for the Flames. He helps slot Backlund better, plays with an edge, can contribute offensively, really good contract. Babcock seemed pretty upset with Kadri based on his garbage day comments, so have to think he'll be moved.
atb is offline  
Old 04-26-2019, 03:10 PM   #13400
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
Ok, so Steinberg brought up the Zucker deal again just now on the Fan. His info suggests that the Wild are more interested in revisiting this than the Flames are. He then goes on to suggest the Flames should still do the deal (with a 1st round pick involved).

My question would be, if the Wild want this more than the Flames, why would the Flames still include a 1st?
From what I gather the original deal was Frolik + 1st for Zucker. Presumably that factored in having Zucker for the playoffs. Maybe without that value, the Flames don't want to move the 1st. Or maybe they realize now Zucker doesn't want to move and they don't want to bring an unhappy player onto the roster.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:06 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy