Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-27-2017, 09:20 PM   #101
Chingas
First Line Centre
 
Chingas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: About 5200 Miles from the Dome
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMagicMan View Post
Not sure this has been discussed before, but why not have the suspension only count towards the team the infraction was incurred against? In this case, next four games vs the Flames, ban Landekog? Or for that matter, give the flames the option of i) ban him for the next four Flames game or ii) ban him for the next 4 consecutive games. This will really benefit the team that the foul was committed against. Thoughts?
I like this in Theory, but I think that there are too many moving pieces for it to work. As an example would the ban follow the player to his next team should he be traded? Could large suspensions be carried over for multiple seasons? What if the victim was also traded? Who is wronged, the player or the team?
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.
Winston Churchill
Chingas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2017, 09:21 PM   #102
bluck
First Line Centre
 
bluck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver :(
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMagicMan View Post
Not sure this has been discussed before, but why not have the suspension only count towards the team the infraction was incurred against? In this case, next four games vs the Flames, ban Landekog? Or for that matter, give the flames the option of i) ban him for the next four Flames game or ii) ban him for the next 4 consecutive games. This will really benefit the team that the foul was committed against. Thoughts?
That would suck if a brawl happened and multiple players were suspended and both teams decided to suspend players for the other team for multiple games. As a fan I would want to see as much of a full roster during lets say the next BOA
bluck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2017, 09:22 PM   #103
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

Seems like every game teams are getting more and more brazen with targeted infractions on our players. I’m worried it’s only a matter of time with Johnny getting hurt by it.
I’d love to call an enforcer up to deal with the odd time. God knows our 4th line is terrible anyways.
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2017, 09:24 PM   #104
Canada 02
Franchise Player
 
Canada 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMagicMan View Post
Not sure this has been discussed before, but why not have the suspension only count towards the team the infraction was incurred against? In this case, next four games vs the Flames, ban Landekog? Or for that matter, give the flames the option of i) ban him for the next four Flames game or ii) ban him for the next 4 consecutive games. This will really benefit the team that the foul was committed against. Thoughts?
the suspension could stretch over multiple seasons; new contract in subsequent years could change the value of the fine; the player could be traded, so the new team bears the burden of the suspension; what if the suspended player is moved to the team the infraction occurred against?

to many issues
Canada 02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2017, 09:24 PM   #105
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heavy Jack View Post
Though it would never happen I think this is a valid point. On severe or blatant botched/missed calls the Refs should have their own review body that could punish them with fines and or missed games. Might bring a bit more consistency to how games are called and urgency/commitment to calling the game the right way if they stood risk to losing income for terrible calls.

The refs who handeled the Detroit game last week or wte it was allowed it to spin out of control and terribly blew the final 8 mins giving the losing team a 5 min major that lead to a 5 on 3 and potential for it to spin even more out of control than it was already. It ties in to player safety IMO and the refs can negatively fuel the emotions of a game if they don’t do their job right.

This will never happen I know but this post does serve a valid point IMO more than the humour it was trying to convey.

They do.

It just isn't made public.

No idea what the severity or anything is/can be, but there is a review panel of some sort that will fine officials for not interpreting rules correctly.

Because there is no transparency I don't know if there is any way at all to see how, if at all, effective it is though.

http://scoutingtherefs.com/2015/11/1...d-accountable/
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2017, 09:35 PM   #106
Lanny'sDaMan
Franchise Player
 
Lanny'sDaMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Nachodamus.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
They do.

It just isn't made public.

No idea what the severity or anything is/can be, but there is a review panel of some sort that will fine officials for not interpreting rules correctly.

Because there is no transparency I don't know if there is any way at all to see how, if at all, effective it is though.

http://scoutingtherefs.com/2015/11/1...d-accountable/

I cannot believe I, of all people, am about to type the following.

Put Kerry in charge of NHL officiating. Have him set the mandate he speaks of in that article. Dead serious. I loathed him when he was active, but after reading no end of his articles and interviews, I have no choice but to admit to him having been one of the better refs to skate the NHL.
Lanny'sDaMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2017, 10:54 PM   #107
cKy
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Okotoks
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny'sDaMan View Post
I cannot believe I, of all people, am about to type the following.

Put Kerry in charge of NHL officiating. Have him set the mandate he speaks of in that article. Dead serious. I loathed him when he was active, but after reading no end of his articles and interviews, I have no choice but to admit to him having been one of the better refs to skate the NHL.
Kerry isnt a good choice right now, he's got some other stuff on his plate...

http://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/nhl/...ncer-1.4386455
__________________

cKy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2017, 11:29 PM   #108
Lanny'sDaMan
Franchise Player
 
Lanny'sDaMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Nachodamus.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cKy View Post
Kerry isnt a good choice right now, he's got some other stuff on his plate...

http://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/nhl/...ncer-1.4386455
Brutal.
Lanny'sDaMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2017, 11:45 PM   #109
activeStick
Franchise Player
 
activeStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
I don’t care about the fine nearly as much as the fact the official right there felt it was only worthy of a two minute minor. It’s really hard to take the NHL seriously in regards to player safety when their officiating crews are still stuck in the Stone Age.
Unless the refs actually looked at a video clip and then called the minor before starting the play again, they can't be expected to see everything, so your condemnation of the refs is a little emotional to be honest.

Refs deserve some of the heat they get on some plays and missed calls when it's clear and obvious, but not all situations are the same.
activeStick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2017, 12:54 PM   #110
shadowlord
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Vancouver, BC
Exp:
Default

Tkachuk holds no ill will towards Landeskog
https://www.tsn.ca/tkachuk-holds-no-...eskog-1.928169


A classy reply, Chucky. Very impressed with his maturity for a young 2nd year player.
shadowlord is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to shadowlord For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:47 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy