04-04-2016, 02:02 PM
|
#501
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OMG!WTF!
Not sure where you're looking but now Canada is 4th highest in personal income, short of Sweden and Denmark and one other. Corporately we are middle of the road.
|
How Canada ranks in income tax:
Average income tax at average wage
*Single income, no children: 27th highest. Behind the UK, U.S., and Australia
*Married couple, two children: 27th highest. Again, behind the UK, U.S. and Australia
List of countries by tax revenue as percentage of GDP
* Canada - 38th
Sales Tax
*I can't be arsed to count down Canada's rank in sales tax, but by eyeballing it I'd say somewhere in the 70s.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
|
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 02:16 PM
|
#502
|
Franchise Player
|
It looks like the OECD charts are all 2014 which likely means 2013 data. The straight income tax charts still represent us as middle of the road too. It will be interesting to what the latest changes do especially in terms of % of GDP.
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 02:19 PM
|
#503
|
In the Sin Bin
|
I know you are always the smartest guy in the room Cliff, but did you really just use a table from 2014 as if it was relevant to today, despite knowing that the tax regime has changed considerably at both the provincial and federal levels?
That doesn't even factor in that, in context, most of the discussion has revolved around the highest marginal rate rather than the average rate for an average family - though the post you replied to didn't make it clear one way or another what the comparison actually was.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-04-2016, 02:41 PM
|
#504
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
I know you are always the smartest guy in the room Cliff, but did you really just use a table from 2014 as if it was relevant to today, despite knowing that the tax regime has changed considerably at both the provincial and federal levels?
That doesn't even factor in that, in context, most of the discussion has revolved around the highest marginal rate rather than the average rate for an average family - though the post you replied to didn't make it clear one way or another what the comparison actually was.
|
Do your own legwork then. Let's see your stats. At least I'm trying to bring some empiricism to the table.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
|
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 04:06 PM
|
#505
|
In the Sin Bin
|
I'm not the one making claims, so go after them. But no, you're not simply bringing "some empiricism to the table" when you make comparisons you know to be misleading and disingenuous.
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 04:14 PM
|
#506
|
Franchise Player
|
do those numbers include provincial taxes? Hard to compare the tax rates in various countries if you don't include secondary jurisdictions.
And yeah, this years's rates would be a tad more pertinent.
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 04:14 PM
|
#507
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
LOL, Craig Chandler is on the board of the directors for the PC's now, in case people thought that they might be moving towards the center or gaining hope of being elected!
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 04:20 PM
|
#508
|
In the Sin Bin
|
If the NDP can get elected, then no handicap can prevent a party from gaining power.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-04-2016, 04:22 PM
|
#509
|
Self Imposed Exile
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
LOL, Craig Chandler is on the board of the directors for the PC's now, in case people thought that they might be moving towards the center or gaining hope of being elected!
|
PC's gotta be the favorite to win the next election.
NDP building hate every day and the wild rose are still seen as crazy's by many.
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 04:28 PM
|
#510
|
First Line Centre
|
All that is required to solve Alberta's fiscal woes is to bring program spending under control. Nothing more.
Here are some numbers ( from RBC):
Current AB deficit: -$6,315,000,000
Current AB program spending per capita: $11,596
Savings from bringing spending in line with BC (24% lower than AB): 9,425,339,000
Savings from bringing spending in line with Ontario (32% lower than AB): 11,880,291,500
Savings from bringing spending in line with Quebec (44% lower than AB): 14,914,361,000
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Zarley For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-04-2016, 04:39 PM
|
#511
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zarley
All that is required to solve Alberta's fiscal woes is to bring program spending under control. Nothing more.
Here are some numbers ( from RBC):
Current AB deficit: -$6,315,000,000
Current AB program spending per capita: $11,596
Savings from bringing spending in line with BC (24% lower than AB): 9,425,339,000
Savings from bringing spending in line with Ontario (32% lower than AB): 11,880,291,500
Savings from bringing spending in line with Quebec (44% lower than AB): 14,914,361,000
|
From the report...
*Public accounts basis. Numbers are based on reports from individual governments and, due to accounting and/or reporting differences, are not strictly comparable between provinces.
I'd be really surprised if Alberta spent 44% more per capita than Quebec...
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 04:58 PM
|
#512
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
From the report...
*Public accounts basis. Numbers are based on reports from individual governments and, due to accounting and/or reporting differences, are not strictly comparable between provinces.
I'd be really surprised if Alberta spent 44% more per capita than Quebec...
|
Here's the most recent adjusted numbers I can find, from 2010. At that point Alberta was spending 12% more than Quebec per capita and in the meantime Quebec has reduced expenditures while we have been spending more.
So while accounting difference may result in slight variation between provinces, there's really no question that we are spending much more than Quebec on a per capita basis.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Zarley For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-04-2016, 05:02 PM
|
#513
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zarley
Here's the most recent adjusted numbers I can find, from 2010. At that point Alberta was spending 12% more than Quebec per capita and in the meantime Quebec has reduced expenditures while we have been spending more.
So while accounting difference may result in slight variation between provinces, there's really no question that we are spending much more than Quebec on a per capita basis.
|
And what are we getting for that money? Do we have newer and more advanced facilities? Better service?
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 05:05 PM
|
#514
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
If the NDP can get elected, then no handicap can prevent a party from gaining power.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kavvy
PC's gotta be the favorite to win the next election.
NDP building hate every day and the wild rose are still seen as crazy's by many.
|
I do tend to agree, but seriously that guy is so divisive that you have to wonder about how that affects things as far as a rebuild or recovery. I even wonder about some moderates like Sandra Janssen and whether she would put up with his comments.
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 05:08 PM
|
#515
|
Norm!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
And what are we getting for that money? Do we have newer and more advanced facilities? Better service?
|
IIRC our wait times and services ranked in the bottom half of the provinces. But I also believe that the numbers I saw were a few years back.
I think we were really low rated when it came to things like cataracts, radiation and bypass surgeries.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 05:11 PM
|
#516
|
Could Care Less
|
Does anyone have recent approval numbers for provincial parties?
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 05:14 PM
|
#517
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
I'd guess they are all at around 5%. Prime time for someone new to come in!
/sideways glance at Alberta party.....come on guys, get it together!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-04-2016, 05:20 PM
|
#518
|
Norm!
|
last one I saw was in February
http://calgaryherald.com/news/politi...ing-falls-poll
Quote:
A Mainstreet Research/Postmedia poll of more than 3,000 Albertans this week shows the NDP have just 27 per cent popular support among decided voters — trailing the Wildrose at 33 per cent and the PCs at 31 per cent.
|
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 05:23 PM
|
#519
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by heep223
Does anyone have recent approval numbers for provincial parties?
|
The last poll I am aware of was by Mainstreet in February.
It had WRP at 33%, the PCs at 31% and the NDP at 27%. ALP and AP at 5% each.
Edit: damn you, CC!
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 05:25 PM
|
#520
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
I'm not the one making claims, so go after them. But no, you're not simply bringing "some empiricism to the table" when you make comparisons you know to be misleading and disingenuous.
|
I was responding to this post:
Quote:
Originally Posted by OMG!WTF!
Not sure where you're looking but now Canada is 4th highest in personal income, short of Sweden and Denmark and one other. Corporately we are middle of the road.
|
I don't know why it's so tough for people to follow threads of conversation in these forums. especially when the comment being responded to is quoted directly.
It's not disingenuous to post the most up-to-date available international stats. What's disingenuous is pretending the recent tax increases have skyrocketed Canada and Alberta into the upper ranks of tax burdens in the civilized world. Anyone who has some inkling of the world outside Alberta knows that's simply ridiculous.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
|
Last edited by CliffFletcher; 04-04-2016 at 05:28 PM.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:59 AM.
|
|