Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-04-2016, 09:44 AM   #1621
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
Someone want to talk me off the ledge re: the disappointing outlook of drafting outside the top 3?

I'm still worried about Tkachuk leveraging his size in junior and thus not being able to translate his game to the same level in the NHL and drafting a defensemen in Chrychun seems like a poor move BPA or not. We really are desperate for impact players in our top 6. I'd rather trade the pick than draft a D man.

Don't know anything about Dubois.
Is Tkachuk at 6'1" and 195 really a guy that is leveraging his size to be successful - think his success has a lot to do with his skill level.

You can never go wrong with top d-men. If he pans out you can always trade a top d for a scoring top 6 FWD (ie. Jones for Johansen).

Dubois is a big, strong, and fast forward that plays with an edge. Actually think he is my favourite outside of the top 3 - team could really use the edge and size he would bring to the top 6.
SuperMatt18 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2016, 09:55 AM   #1622
Demetric
Scoring Winger
 
Demetric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: 0° latitude, 0° longitude
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
Really I am happy as long as we draft in the top 6. I see a clear top 3, and then 3 pretty equal guys after that with another dip in the quality of player at 7.

1.Matthews
2.Laine
3. Puljujarvi

4a. Tkachuk
4b. Chrychun
4c. Dubois

Any of those guys and I think they really help the team moving forward.
I think I would add 4d. Nylander. I think we will be fine with who we are able to get in the draft this year
__________________
Let the Yutes play!
Demetric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 09:56 AM   #1623
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

And hasn't Chychrun been used on the wing as well? I would prefer to get Dubois if possible but getting a guy like Chychrun would be awesome too. I do agree wtih polak about Tkachuk and his playing style may not be as dominant in the NHL. I'm sure the kid has a ton of skill because he's not the biggest guy in the league or anything but I don't think he'll turn into a power forward in the NHL...I don't think he'll be a bust and if the Flames got him, I think he'd do well. I just would prefer if the Flames got someone else.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Poe969 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2016, 10:06 AM   #1624
PlayfulGenius
Franchise Player
 
PlayfulGenius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Exp:
Default

Assuming the Flames pick outside the Top 3...are there any young NHL players (including G) that are possible pickups in exchange for the pick?

Drouin is a prime example of someone available, but I think we'll all agree he's not worth the pick.

I'm thinking more along the lines of a deal similar to the Seth Jones for Ryan Johansen swap...or, a situation where an emerging backup somewhere makes their starter expendable.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LickTheEnvelope View Post
... Eakins' claims Gagne's line played Kessel's line even...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hells Bells View Post
Yeah, Gagner's line was -4 and Kessel's was +4, so it all evened out.
PlayfulGenius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 10:17 AM   #1625
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Unless it's Price you don't give up an early first for a goalie.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vulcan For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2016, 10:22 AM   #1626
Frequitude
Franchise Player
 
Frequitude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 555 Saddledome Rise SE
Exp:
Default

We're really starting to converge on either
a) Picking 5th, 6th or 7th (61% chance). This is driven by a 68% chance that we finish 5th or 6th last combined with the decent chance of being bumped a spot in the lottery from there.
b) Picking top 3. The chance of this happening is going to stay pretty constant in that 30% range (~9-10% per pick).

Notable change over the weekend is that we are now officially eliminated from finishing 30th.


(Draft pick odds using Enoch Root's standings-pick percentages combined with sportsclubstats.com's final standings probabilities for each potential Flames remaining record as of today)
Frequitude is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frequitude For This Useful Post:
kn
Old 04-04-2016, 10:23 AM   #1627
PlayfulGenius
Franchise Player
 
PlayfulGenius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Exp:
Default

What about Blake Wheeler?

Or Brandon Saad?

Those are the only 2 I've thought of thus far.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LickTheEnvelope View Post
... Eakins' claims Gagne's line played Kessel's line even...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hells Bells View Post
Yeah, Gagner's line was -4 and Kessel's was +4, so it all evened out.
PlayfulGenius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 10:25 AM   #1628
Bunk
Franchise Player
 
Bunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
Someone want to talk me off the ledge re: the disappointing outlook of drafting outside the top 3?

I'm still worried about Tkachuk leveraging his size in junior and thus not being able to translate his game to the same level in the NHL and drafting a defensemen in Chrychun seems like a poor move BPA or not. We really are desperate for impact players in our top 6. I'd rather trade the pick than draft a D man.

Don't know anything about Dubois.
In some ways seems a similarly deep top end draft to 2013 - we got Monahan at 6.

Does that help?
__________________
Trust the snake.
Bunk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bunk For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2016, 10:30 AM   #1629
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Can we just leave polak where he is? If anyone manages to pull him off this one he's just going to wander towards a different ledge.
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to MrMastodonFarm For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2016, 10:34 AM   #1630
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

I think people should also temper their expectations as I don't think this first rounder makes the team this year (unless we win the lottery).
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 10:35 AM   #1631
saXon
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frequitude View Post
We're really starting to converge on either
a) Picking 5th, 6th or 7th (61% chance). This is driven by a 68% chance that we finish 5th or 6th last combined with the decent chance of being bumped a spot in the lottery from there.
b) Picking top 3. The chance of this happening is going to stay pretty constant in that 30% range (~9-10% per pick).

Notable change over the weekend is that we are now officially eliminated from finishing 30th.

(Draft pick odds using Enoch Root's standings-pick percentages combined with sportsclubstats.com's final standings probabilities for each potential Flames remaining record as of today)

Maybe I'm wrong here, but each pick being 9-10% chance doesn't add up to 30% picking top 3 does it? Isn't it still a 9-10% chance with the combination of the 3 chances? As far as I can remember back in math/stats class, chances aren't added to each other for a grand total percentage-wise.
__________________

saXon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 10:43 AM   #1632
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Can we just leave polak where he is? If anyone manages to pull him off this one he's just going to wander towards a different ledge.
It's too late. I'm pumped now.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 10:47 AM   #1633
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saXon View Post
Maybe I'm wrong here, but each pick being 9-10% chance doesn't add up to 30% picking top 3 does it? Isn't it still a 9-10% chance with the combination of the 3 chances? As far as I can remember back in math/stats class, chances aren't added to each other for a grand total percentage-wise.
No, this is a distribution of odds that must add up to 100%. In this case, yes you do add them up. If you look at post 1626, the red row at the bottom is a current distribution of odds for where the Flames could pick. The first 3 picks are 9, 9 and 9%. So the chances of top 3 is 27%, and the chances of not top 3 is 73%.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2016, 11:06 AM   #1634
OutOfTheCube
Franchise Player
 
OutOfTheCube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frequitude View Post
We're really starting to converge on either
a) Picking 5th, 6th or 7th (61% chance). This is driven by a 68% chance that we finish 5th or 6th last combined with the decent chance of being bumped a spot in the lottery from there.
b) Picking top 3. The chance of this happening is going to stay pretty constant in that 30% range (~9-10% per pick).

Notable change over the weekend is that we are now officially eliminated from finishing 30th.


(Draft pick odds using Enoch Root's standings-pick percentages combined with sportsclubstats.com's final standings probabilities for each potential Flames remaining record as of today)
Well at least we can all agree that, factually, the Flames will be picking inside of the top ten.
OutOfTheCube is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to OutOfTheCube For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2016, 11:31 AM   #1635
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

If the Flames do not win the lotto. I'm hoping Nylander slips to CGY. I'll be pleased with Sergachyev as well. Or McLeod even if some of you don't want him.
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 11:45 AM   #1636
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Flames biggest need that can be addressed via the draft is top six right shot winger with size. Going to be a damn shame if we don't walk away with at least one of the Finns. They're a perfect match.

//totally new information!
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 11:59 AM   #1637
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

How does Alex Nylander stack up to his brother? I'd like to hear the comparison from someone in the know.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 12:04 PM   #1638
Bunk
Franchise Player
 
Bunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Ugh, April 30th seems an eternity away. I'd like to at least get to the point where we're hand wringing about who we'll get or who we should take with certainty about our draft position.
__________________
Trust the snake.
Bunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 12:04 PM   #1639
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames View Post
How does Alex Nylander stack up to his brother? I'd like to hear the comparison from someone in the know.
Not in the know but I've heard he doesn't shy away from going into the tough areas. He's a couple inches taller than his brother so he could be more physical than either his dad or brother. I wouldn't mind it if we took him as he's right shot with skill. Maybe not a perfect fit with the Monahan line but fine for Bennett.

I get the feeling he's going to be a sure NHL player, maybe a star.

Last edited by Vulcan; 04-04-2016 at 12:06 PM.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 12:35 PM   #1640
icecube
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: compton
Exp:
Default

I can tell you beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Flames did win the draft lottery this year. I'm from the future.

- John Titor
icecube is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to icecube For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
2016 nhl draft , nhl draft , nhl entry draft


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:08 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy