02-16-2014, 10:14 AM
|
#21
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Nash!
|
|
|
02-16-2014, 10:14 AM
|
#22
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Well, that was weird.
__________________
The Quest stands upon the edge of a knife. Stray but a little, and it will fail, to the ruin of all. Yet hope remains while the Company is true. Go Flames Go!
Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory... lasts forever.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MissTeeks For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-16-2014, 10:14 AM
|
#23
|
In the Sin Bin
|
That won't count.
|
|
|
02-16-2014, 10:14 AM
|
#24
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Section 222
|
No goal from what i saw. He hit it off the top of the net.
__________________
Go Flames Go!!
|
|
|
02-16-2014, 10:15 AM
|
#25
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTeeks
Well, that was weird.
|
Very. I don't think he touched the suck though.
Please call it a goal!
|
|
|
02-16-2014, 10:15 AM
|
#26
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
The puck hit Rask in the back doesn't that nullify the high stick?
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
|
|
|
02-16-2014, 10:16 AM
|
#27
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: BC
|
I don't understand he didn't hit the puck.
|
|
|
02-16-2014, 10:16 AM
|
#28
|
Franchise Player
|
Too bad.
|
|
|
02-16-2014, 10:16 AM
|
#29
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Fast pace thus far - lots of skating. Duchene looking good with Perry/Getzlaf.
|
|
|
02-16-2014, 10:16 AM
|
#30
|
Resident Videologist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
What a strange play.
|
|
|
02-16-2014, 10:16 AM
|
#31
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports
The puck hit Rask in the back doesn't that nullify the high stick?
|
No, can't be directed into the net with a highstick.
Can't hit it with a highstick and then have it go off the goalie's glove, for example.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flash Walken For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-16-2014, 10:16 AM
|
#32
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Conspiracy!!
|
|
|
02-16-2014, 10:16 AM
|
#33
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhettzky
No goal from what i saw. He hit it off the top of the net.
|
Isn't the definition of high stick mean that it has to go directly in to the net or touched by a teammate/yourself?
Does the goalie touching it technically count as negating the high stick or does he have to have possession?
|
|
|
02-16-2014, 10:17 AM
|
#34
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports
The puck hit Rask in the back doesn't that nullify the high stick?
|
in international hockey they need control of the puck to nullify the high stick
|
|
|
02-16-2014, 10:17 AM
|
#35
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports
The puck hit Rask in the back doesn't that nullify the high stick?
|
Nope. If you bat a puck off the goalie and in with a high stick, it's still no goal.
Besides, the puck was stopped on top of the net. If the referee is on the ball, the play should have been blown dead regardless.
|
|
|
02-16-2014, 10:17 AM
|
#36
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
he didnt hit the puck... and the replay didn't show he conclusively did... and the call on the ice was a goal... whatever
|
|
|
02-16-2014, 10:17 AM
|
#37
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Halifax
|
Good call
|
|
|
02-16-2014, 10:18 AM
|
#38
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skaloper
I don't understand he didn't hit the puck.
|
all depends what camera angle(s) they have upstairs. From a couple angles it looked like he touched it.
|
|
|
02-16-2014, 10:18 AM
|
#39
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: BC
|
I will agree that it shouldn't count but from what I saw he didn't touch the puck hence unless there is rule against hitting the net to put it in...
Also the puck was right at the cross bar so I don't think it was a high stick.
The call was probably that the play should have been dead when it rested on top.
Last edited by Skaloper; 02-16-2014 at 10:21 AM.
|
|
|
02-16-2014, 10:19 AM
|
#40
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Section 222
|
I like the looks of the Benn-Crosby-Bergeron line so far. Hope they get to stick together.
__________________
Go Flames Go!!
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:05 AM.
|
|