Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-19-2013, 10:49 AM   #101
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny'sDaMan View Post
Roger is dialed right in with the Flames. I would take him as possibly one of the most credible sources when it comes to this team.
He doesn't have a particularly strong track record with this sort of speculation.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 10:50 AM   #102
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

Glencross-Stajan-Stempniak
Baertechi-Backlund-Hudler
Tanguay-Rinehart-Horak
Jones-Aliu-Knight-Bouma-McGratton-Jackman etc

Already no room for Cammi, we have a vet line that can shelter the young guys. Move him out. Tanguay too if possible, guy like Jackman can take the 3rd line, protect the kids on that line.
Da_Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 10:50 AM   #103
Phaneufenstein
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jah Chalgary
Exp:
Default

Paul Frickin Gaustad got a first round pick at the deadline.
More ammo for Cammo
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Champion View Post
The Oilers don't need a Giordano. They have a glut of him.
Phaneufenstein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 10:57 AM   #104
lifetimefan
First Line Centre
 
lifetimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Stuck on old squelch.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven View Post
I think most people are undervaluing Cammi (and just about every other Flames asset). It seems like we are determined to lose every trade that gets rumoured around here and that every player that joins the Flames suddenly has no value because they are under the CP microscope.
When Jay Feaster is the one making those trades, this is a given.
lifetimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 11:03 AM   #105
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

I would think Cammy would be a good fit on Dallas. They need an upgrade on LW.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nhl/teams/dal/depthchart

Ray Whitney is the 1st line LW, then it drops down to Eric Nystrom.

I would actually try and target the 2015 first round pick. Try and get a ticket in for the McDavid sweepstakes. However, they do have 2 firsts this year (Acquired one from Boston in the Jagr deal), so perhaps that would be a good place to start. Not sure if Dallas is still a budget team, but Flames could retain some salary or take a contract back. Seems like a logical destination for Cammy anyways.

Islanders still seem like too much of a budget team to take on a 7 million dollar salary with a 6 million cap hit. If the Flames retain salary, then possibly.

Ottawa does make the most sense, and they have the cap space to easily fit him in. Could be a great triggerman for Spezza, though Silfverberg is expected to take a step up this season.

I don't think it will be too tough to get rid of Cammy for a 1st to a variety of teams (as long as the Flames eat a contract the other way), but the Flames might have to settle for a 1st for next year (and in which case, I would prefer they wait an additional year for the 2015 draft).

Edit: Dallas also has 2 seconds this year. Maybe the Boston 1st + their own second (40th overall)?

Last edited by Calgary4LIfe; 06-19-2013 at 11:06 AM.
Calgary4LIfe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 11:03 AM   #106
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lifetimefan View Post
When Jay Feaster is the one making those trades, this is a given.
Ask Pittsburgh or St. L if they want a do-over?
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ricardodw For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2013, 11:07 AM   #107
Skaloper
First Line Centre
 
Skaloper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Kinda sad it is Cammi and not Tanguay. Mike has a good attitude but Tanguay is a whiny crybaby who quits way to early on his team. Please get rid of Tanguay, Feaster.
Then who would we put in the shootout? I think we need to keep Tanguay if nothing more than a 3rd liner who can specialize in the shootout since it is a part of the game and he in the past few years is the only player who has had any success. Take into consideration that we don't have a lot of fire power there are probably going to be quite a few games going to the shootout next season.
Skaloper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 11:09 AM   #108
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Bouwmeester had much higher value than Cammalleri. And he got the Flames a late 1st and spare parts.

This idea that Cammalleri is worth a 1st is a pipe dream. More likely he returns a 2nd rounder and an overpaid 3 mil roster player.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2013, 11:09 AM   #109
Husky
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

I could see the Sens kicking tires. Need a bit more venetarn offense especially if Alfie is gone.
Husky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 11:09 AM   #110
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Honestly, if that is all that's being offered I'd try to convince Mike to be a leader on a young team that isn't going to win much, play his heart out and promise him you'll flip him to a better team towards the 2014 trade deadline... where you're sure to get more then that for him.
Did you guys misread fourth 1st rounder as 4th rounder or do people seriously think Cammalleri is worth more than a 1st? I'd take the first and run.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2013, 11:10 AM   #111
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

First for cammelleri is a pipe dream at this point.

I take a second rounder in this years draft and the cap space and consider it a success.
Flash Walken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 11:14 AM   #112
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Did you guys misread fourth 1st rounder as 4th rounder or do people seriously think Cammalleri is worth more than a 1st? I'd take the first and run.
Yeah, apparently we did. Corrected on the 2nd page.

I'd take it and run too.
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 11:14 AM   #113
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Ask Pittsburgh or St. L if they want a do-over?
I doubt either team would want a "do-over".

Iggy was had for a late 1st and spare parts. Pitt would make that trade any day of the week.

JBO was one of the Blues best d-man once he arrived. He played better than PIETRANGELO in the playoffs. Again a guy they got for a 1st and spare parts.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kyuss275 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2013, 11:17 AM   #114
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
Bouwmeester had much higher value than Cammalleri. And he got the Flames a late 1st and spare parts.

This idea that Cammalleri is worth a 1st is a pipe dream. More likely he returns a 2nd rounder and an overpaid 3 mil roster player.

I actually think the flames can get a 1st round player for Cammi at the draft or off season. They will need to eat 50% of his salary to do it. The other option is pay 2/3rd of his salary this year and trade him at the deadline for a 1st.

I will agree that no team is going to give up a 1st if they have to take his full salary.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kyuss275 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2013, 11:17 AM   #115
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

I think ownership could be willing to eat half of cammalleri's contract and that might be the only way we can deal him now. They'd only be eating his salary for a year.

One or both of Tanguay and Canmalleri have to go this offseason. Too many LW with Glencross, Baertschi, Cammalleri and Tanguay. Pretty clear the latter two aren't part of the long term solution.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 11:18 AM   #116
DuckmanX
Powerplay Quarterback
 
DuckmanX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Here, lookin for Flames news. Sure beats sifting through K.King's garbage.
Exp:
Default

If we were to retain 50% of Cammy's salary, making him more appealing...

Does this effectively make Cammy a $3.0m cap hit player for our trading partner, and only hurt our cap space for 3.0m one year? Or does it take his yearly wage @ $7.0m halved, then his cap hit (avg) readjusted (3.5m cap hit for Flames and 2.5m cap hit for other team)?
__________________
Just my 2 cents. Worth 80% as much as an American opinion! EDIT: Seeing how we round down, due to the lack of a physical penny, its worthless.
DuckmanX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 11:21 AM   #117
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
I doubt either team would want a "do-over".

Iggy was had for a late 1st and spare parts. Pitt would make that trade any day of the week.
So let me get this straight... you think that the Penguins if they were offered to undo the trade wouldn't do it? That's crazy... they'd get a first round pick and a couple of C prospects for almost literally nothing.

Bouwmeester is a bit more debatable since they have an extra year on the deal but I think it'd be close with them.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 11:22 AM   #118
lifetimefan
First Line Centre
 
lifetimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Stuck on old squelch.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Ask Pittsburgh or St. L if they want a do-over?
Pittsburgh was all on Iggy. I consider it a loss because the Boston deal was better.

Bouw to St. Louis was a beak even deal at best. #4 was having his best year as a Flame.

Feaster just has an "easy mark" vibe IMO, but that's what happens when you have a lawyer gauging hockey talent.
lifetimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 11:23 AM   #119
zukes
Nostradamus
 
zukes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London Ont.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Honestly, if that is all that's being offered I'd try to convince Mike to be a leader on a young team that isn't going to win much, play his heart out and promise him you'll flip him to a better team towards the 2014 trade deadline... where you're sure to get more then that for him.
That is a stupid post, ask nik. It makes way too much sense for both parties.
__________________
agggghhhhhh!!!
zukes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 11:26 AM   #120
shermanator
Franchise Player
 
shermanator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Cammalleri for Niederreiter anyone?
__________________

shermanator is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:28 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy