Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-04-2013, 05:14 PM   #381
calgARI
Not Jim Playfair
 
calgARI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dagger View Post
Drafting a kid at 18 is much more difficult than picking up someone like Giordano who is much farther ahead in his development curve. Guys like Giordano and Horak were not developed by the Flames, and that's where this organization has done so poorly over the years.
What? Giordano played two full seasons for the Flames' minor league affiliate. and has spent his whole NHL career with Calgary. Horak has played his two professional seasons between Calgary and Abbotsford. Who developed those two guys then if it wasn't the Flames organization?
__________________
CORNELL
National Champions: 1967, 1970

CALGARY
Stanley Cup Champions: 1989
calgARI is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to calgARI For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2013, 05:17 PM   #382
IgiTang
Self-Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Exp:
Default

If we take a Dman with our first, top 5, im done with the Flames for a while. Seth Jones maybe somwthing special but so are the others. Dmen take much longer to develope tho.
IgiTang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 05:21 PM   #383
Wronskian
Scoring Winger
 
Wronskian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: BH dungeon
Exp:
Default

http://www.hockeyprospectus.com/arti...articleid=1464

I'm not sure if anyone on this board takes too much stock in advanced hockey stats, but I'd have to agree with posters suggesting we take Mackinnon or even Drouin over Jones. The link I've posted gets into the history of drafting a Dman 1st overall vs. selecting a forward. Interesting analysis wherein he ultimately suggests that in general selecting a forward is best.

Furthermore, I see any proposal to get another top 5 pick slightly implausible without including Sven. He is NHL ready and I'd suggest that packaging him with the STL. 1st might do the trick. I feel that somehow getting Mackinnon and Drouin would be a huge turning point for this franchise.
Wronskian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 05:28 PM   #384
Phaneufenstein
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jah Chalgary
Exp:
Default

If we have 3rd overall pick and Jones and Drouin are gone, do you go with:

Mackinnon?

or

Barkov?

To me this is almost a tougher choice than picking 1st overall, but leaning towards the Canadian kid
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Champion View Post
The Oilers don't need a Giordano. They have a glut of him.
Phaneufenstein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 05:28 PM   #385
RyZ
First Line Centre
 
RyZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Please, not the dman. I would far rather build around a Stamkos, Tavares, Kane etc than Doughty, Johnson, Bogosian, Hedman, Larson etc.

It has to be Drouin or McKinnon if we pick in the top 3.
RyZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 05:29 PM   #386
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgARI View Post
What? Giordano played two full seasons for the Flames' minor league affiliate. and has spent his whole NHL career with Calgary. Horak has played his two professional seasons between Calgary and Abbotsford. Who developed those two guys then if it wasn't the Flames organization?
So it's two draft picks and three and a half developed guys total. Either way, it's inexcusable and it's a big reason why the team is where it is.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”

Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 05:32 PM   #387
The Professor
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by edslunch View Post
Would anyone trade Bart or Gaudreau and a first to get a second top three pick? Are these guys that much better or sure deals?
No. I think it would be impossible to get into the top three.

BUT, assuming our pick is in the top four, and we ended up taking a non-centre (Drouin or Jones) I would definitely try to move up into the 5-8 range to try get Lindholm or Monahan if they were still available. It would still take a large package, but IMO would be worth it to make sure we get a high end centre out of this draft without passing over the higher end talent like Jones or Drouin.

I could see the Flames being hesitant to do this though. Not having a second rounder, I would guess we'll try and hold onto at least one of the later first round picks....
The Professor is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Professor For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2013, 05:33 PM   #388
Tinordi
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

Man that Russian in enticing, huge playmaking center?

Tinordi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 05:38 PM   #389
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

^ No Russians that high in the draft should be a rule. They are not guys to build a team around.
Knut is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Knut For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2013, 05:38 PM   #390
Phanuthier
Franchise Player
 
Phanuthier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Exp:
Default

Not sure if its been mentioned in this thread yet... I think Bob McKenzie said 10/10 scouts asked MacKinnon vs Jones, said they would take MacKinnon. Unless we draft 1st overall, we got to shot. If we have the 1st overall, go with MacKinnon. Seth would be awesome. I like what I see from Druoin, but after that, I really have no clue.
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
Phanuthier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 05:45 PM   #391
Tinordi
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesla View Post
^ No Russians that high in the draft should be a rule. They are not guys to build a team around.
There's rumblings from European scouts over on HF that Nikushkin should be a top 2 pick he's looking that good. The only reason he'll fall is based on the interview and flight risk. Anyway, he looks like he could be a dominant center if it works out. The size and skill are undeniable.
Tinordi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 06:07 PM   #392
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi View Post
There's rumblings from European scouts over on HF that Nikushkin should be a top 2 pick he's looking that good. The only reason he'll fall is based on the interview and flight risk. Anyway, he looks like he could be a dominant center if it works out. The size and skill are undeniable.
Datsyuk and Malkin are the only two russians in the league i would build my team around. Maybe Kovalchuk... but that is iffy.

The Flames can not miss this pick and for every Malkin there are multiple Filatov's and Zherdev's.
Knut is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Knut For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2013, 06:08 PM   #393
calgARI
Not Jim Playfair
 
calgARI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
So it's two draft picks and three and a half developed guys total. Either way, it's inexcusable and it's a big reason why the team is where it is.
Absolutely it's inexcusable but I just want the very few victories they have had counted.
__________________
CORNELL
National Champions: 1967, 1970

CALGARY
Stanley Cup Champions: 1989
calgARI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 06:13 PM   #394
josef
First Line Centre
 
josef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: bavaria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
The german defenceman who dishes to Drouin and Mackinnon looks enticing as well.
you´re talking about konrad abeltshauser??
the sharks drafted him in 2010 (round 6 - # 163), so we have to trade for him
__________________
Quote:
Marc Savard was pretty skilled . . . . for a fat fata!! - Mr. Cowperson
josef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 06:17 PM   #395
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi View Post
There's rumblings from European scouts over on HF that Nikushkin should be a top 2 pick he's looking that good. The only reason he'll fall is based on the interview and flight risk. Anyway, he looks like he could be a dominant center if it works out. The size and skill are undeniable.
He's a LW though. I'd prefer Mackinnon or Bakrov over him and we take a D-man with the other two picks. If we did take Mikushkin though i would understand but i would be upset.
__________________
Just trying to do my best

Last edited by Hockey_Ninja; 04-04-2013 at 06:20 PM.
Hockey_Ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 06:18 PM   #396
Coelah
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Coelah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi View Post
There's rumblings from European scouts over on HF that Nikushkin should be a top 2 pick he's looking that good. The only reason he'll fall is based on the interview and flight risk. Anyway, he looks like he could be a dominant center if it works out. The size and skill are undeniable.
If he drops, I think the Flames give serious consideration to picking him up. One of the positives of having more than one 1st round pick. I don't think they touch him with their top 5 pick. Too much at stake for the Flames right now.

One wrinkle is that Columbus has 3 first round picks and could have the same idea...draft a quality guy with their early pick and gamble on one of their later picks.
Coelah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 06:27 PM   #397
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgARI View Post
I would be disappointed if they picked Jones over MacKinnon.
I could be wrong but I have a feeling the Flyers are really high on Jones.

I wonder if the Flames had the third pick (with Drouin and MacKinnon off the board), and say the Flyers had the 5th pick if they would move the 5th (Barkov/Lindholm) and Couturier for the 3rd (Jones).

Probably unrealistic and a reach but I can dream.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 06:37 PM   #398
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi View Post
There's rumblings from European scouts over on HF that Nikushkin should be a top 2 pick he's looking that good. The only reason he'll fall is based on the interview and flight risk. Anyway, he looks like he could be a dominant center if it works out. The size and skill are undeniable.
He is looking that good, I agree.

However, 2 year contract in the KHL + NHL ELC max = incentive for him to stay in the KHL. I really think he will drop due to that. I think he will be elite though.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 06:38 PM   #399
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
I could be wrong but I have a feeling the Flyers are really high on Jones.

I wonder if the Flames had the third pick (with Drouin and MacKinnon off the board), and say the Flyers had the 5th pick if they would move the 5th (Barkov/Lindholm) and Couturier for the 3rd (Jones).

Probably unrealistic and a reach but I can dream.
That would be a huge overpayment. A 2nd to move up that much would be a huge payment.

Plus I can't see Colorado passing on Jones and can't see two teams other than Florida and Colorado finishing lower than us.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 06:41 PM   #400
Cheerio
#1 Goaltender
 
Cheerio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Exp:
Default

I'll bet Florida takes MacKinnon, Colorado takes Jones, and then at 3 we take Drouin
Cheerio is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Cheerio For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:41 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy