This thread has officially nuked the fridge. Any attempt at debate is embarrassingly one-sided. Tower has had more than ample opportunity to address questions and engage the curious - he has made no effort to do so.
That was an interesting article Tower posted. Absolutely nothing to do with any of his arguments, but I think that by this point that is to be expected.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bobblehead For This Useful Post:
I think that if I smoked some crack I would have killed as many brain cells as I did watching that video. I swear I could actually feel them emploding.
I think that if I smoked some crack I would have killed as many brain cells as I did watching that video. I swear I could actually feel them emploding.
It also shows how much "free-thinking" Tower is capable of. They basically are all using the same language, same expressions, same poor grasp of the English language. Bunch of nuts.
It also shows how much "free-thinking" Tower is capable of. They basically are all using the same language, same expressions, same poor grasp of the English language. Bunch of nuts.
I don't think Tower understands the crap he is talking about... he just posted an article about a lawyer doing what he considered to be good work. She is fighting all the mortgage lenders for people who are facing foreclosure.
Her tactics may not be successful in the end and some might argue that they are simply stalling tactics, but she is working within the frame work of the existing law.
She isn't talking nonsense about not consenting to be bound by a mortgage because the money you were lent isn't real, or whatever he is saying now.
I think he is looking for a way to stick it to "the man", but he doesn't understand that there legitimate arguments that he can make instead of this freeman nonsense.
Well Tower, before you posted that youtube clip, I didn't believe you. But once I saw the jerky red screen and one sided audio that couldn't possibly have been made without actual police officers, an actual ticket or more than one person, I'm convinced.
Your lack of knowledge pretty much on every aspect of legal study or practice along with your complete lack of understanding of rights and obligations in society has totally been redeemed. Consider me a Freedomiteistman.
So Tower, do you figure that clip actually shows that these ideas are valid? To me it sounded like a guy got out of his car and blathered at a cop for a minute or two, saying nothing that was even remotely correct and the cop chose not to be confrontational. Had I been the cop I might have told the guy that he was welcome to present his arguments in Court and if chose not to attend the Court would certainly address matters without need of his presence and that he would be welcome to take the opportunity of evaluating the functioning of the legal system from within.
__________________
onetwo and threefour... Together no more. The end of an era. Let's rebuild...
So Tower, do you figure that clip actually shows that these ideas are valid? To me it sounded like a guy got out of his car and blathered at a cop for a minute or two, saying nothing that was even remotely correct and the cop chose not to be confrontational. Had I been the cop I might have told the guy that he was welcome to present his arguments in Court and if chose not to attend the Court would certainly address matters without need of his presence and that he would be welcome to take the opportunity of evaluating the functioning of the legal system from within.
Jesus man!!! I am sick of Tower having to spoonfeed you everything!!! It's not about what he does or what those very intelligent fellows in the car do, it's about what you can do for yourself. Do or do not... there is no try. Fear is the path to the darkside. Fear leads to Anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.
How many times does he have to make this argument til you understand. The proof is in the pudding.
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamingLonghorn For This Useful Post:
I want to see part 3 of the video... 12 weeks later Mr. Freeman gets stopped for speeding again and due to his unpaid ticket and the subsequent warrant out for his arrest he gets hauled off to jail.
As he is being put in the car observers can hear his nonsensical screaming.. "I do not accept this... he threw it in my LAP.. MY LLLLLLLLLLAAAAAAAAAAPPPPP!!!!!"
Seriously, don't you find it a little bit convenient that the guy can choose not to accept his ticket, presumably because he does not consent to abide by the Motor Vehicle Act. Yet for the purpose of obtaining a drivers license, registering his car and getting insurance he doesn't seem to have a problem following the rules set out in the Act. Now of course this an assumption based on the fact the cop allowed him to continue driving which I don't think he would have if he was not a licensed driver or didn't have insurance/registration.
