Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-26-2015, 05:19 PM   #1
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Flames Flames have not had recent contract talks with Glencross

Wes Gilbertson @SUNGilbertson
Not a major surprise, but #Flames GM Brad Treliving tells Sportsnet Fan 960 there have no recent contract talks with LW Curtis Glencross.

could change at any moment but FWIW with the team's highest profile UFA
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2015, 05:21 PM   #2
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Just listened. Doesn't sound like he has held extension talks with Glencross or Ramo
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2015, 05:22 PM   #3
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

I'm torn. I like the guy, I appreciate that he took a hometown discount to play here, but do we need him in the future?

I'd be fine with a short contract if he takes a big hometown discount but if rumours are true that he's looking to get paid then I'll pass.

Extending Ramo on the other hand, I'd be curious about.
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post:
Old 01-26-2015, 05:25 PM   #4
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

I would sign Glencross and even Ramo but it is all about term
neo45 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to neo45 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-26-2015, 05:27 PM   #5
doctajones428
First Line Centre
 
doctajones428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Fort St. John, BC
Exp:
Default

Good.
doctajones428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2015, 05:27 PM   #6
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I've suspected that Ramo and Glencross were not pieces moving forward for the flames for a while. Maybe they're just waiting until coser to the deadline to hash it out but I don't think Burke or Treliving will let them walk for nothing like it happened with Cammy this time.

Not sure how it's going to shake down But I'd prefer to move on from Glencross and to a lesser extent Ramo.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2015, 05:28 PM   #7
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

He'll likely want around $5M AAV with term (rightfully so), and given his age and our stage in the rebuild, that doesn't make sense.

Last edited by Ashasx; 01-26-2015 at 09:33 PM.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2015, 05:34 PM   #8
spetch
Powerplay Quarterback
 
spetch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: AB
Exp:
Default

He was too busy at the pool in Disney with his family this past week to talk maybe?
spetch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2015, 05:36 PM   #9
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
He's likely want around $5M AAV with term (rightfully so), and given his age and our stage in the rebuild, that doesn't make sense.
If that's the case then I agree. He'd deserve it but doesn't fit our team
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2015, 05:36 PM   #10
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

My hope is Ramo and Glencross are both moved at the deadline regardless of the Flames spot in the standings. It's very likely neither will be back if they hit free agency as there's no room for Ramo and Glencross will be expecting more than his play and age merits.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 01-26-2015, 05:38 PM   #11
PIMking
Franchise Player
 
PIMking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Exp:
Default

I wouldn't mind to see Glencross go somewhere else.
PIMking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2015, 05:50 PM   #12
burn_baby_burn
Franchise Player
 
burn_baby_burn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chiefs Kingdom, Yankees Universe, C of Red.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spetch View Post
He was too busy at the pool in Disney with his family this past week to talk maybe?
Grand Califorian?
__________________
burn_baby_burn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2015, 05:56 PM   #13
Bezer
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Bezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: H E double hockey sticks
Exp:
Default

I hope we can trade him at the deadline or at least trade his rights near the draft.
Bezer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2015, 05:56 PM   #14
FBI
Franchise Player
 
FBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Flames fan in Seattle
Exp:
Default

Yeah, not too choked up here. Case of "how will we ever replace glencross??" A la Cammalleri. I think pretty easily.
__________________
FBI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2015, 05:58 PM   #15
Hackey
Franchise Player
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Perfect scenario we flip Glencross for something decent before deadline. Nothing against him but I know he's going to want a big contract and I don't think the Flames should pay it. No issue with Ramo leaving either. If we can land something for him that's a bonus.
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2015, 06:00 PM   #16
spetch
Powerplay Quarterback
 
spetch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_baby_burn View Post
Grand Califorian?
Yup.
spetch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2015, 06:05 PM   #17
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

In all honesty, if you are hoping to move Glencross, you are hoping we fall completely out of the playoff picture. In short, you are hoping we lose. While Treliving and Burke could move him regardless, I think they realize he is a very important piece of our playoff run.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-26-2015, 06:08 PM   #18
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
In all honesty, if you are hoping to move Glencross, you are hoping we fall completely out of the playoff picture. In short, you are hoping we lose. While Treliving and Burke could move him regardless, I think they realize he is a very important piece of our playoff run.
I am hoping they move him, and I am most certainly NOT hoping we lose.

I believe we could deal Glencross away for futures and not really miss him too much. We have a boat load of young guys ready to step in and this team scores by committee for the most part anyhow.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 01-26-2015, 06:12 PM   #19
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Our playoff run is not important enough to not trade a guy like Glencross if you can get good assets in return. A playoff push is nice...but only if it doesn't get in the way of long-term planning.

As for Ramo, I still wish he could succeed here and be the one to team up with Ortio next year...but at this stage it wouldn't be a huge loss to see him go. I really doubt you'd get a Berra-esque 2nd for him, but one can dream.
Table 5 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Table 5 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-26-2015, 06:13 PM   #20
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
In all honesty, if you are hoping to move Glencross, you are hoping we fall completely out of the playoff picture. In short, you are hoping we lose. While Treliving and Burke could move him regardless, I think they realize he is a very important piece of our playoff run.
I'm not one of those guys that's always dumping on Glencross but I feel his value to this team isn't nearly as high as some would like to think. I highly doubt that if the Flames trade him their season would immediately head south as if anything this team has shown the ability to overcome players out of the lineup.

In a perfect world the Flames could retain him (and maybe both parties still can find middle ground on a deal) but economically it's not going to be prudent for this franchise to pay $$$ for an aging vet and rather than repeat last year where the Flames didn't recoup any assets for Cammalleri I feel given this stage of their rebuild it would be most beneficial to acquire a solid asset if possible. Obviously if the offers are of the 3rd round pick variety then you hold on to him but they should shop him and if the offers are 2nd round pick or better I feel not trading him would be doing a disservice to the rebuild.

Last edited by Erick Estrada; 01-26-2015 at 06:15 PM.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:33 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy