Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-14-2025, 06:57 PM   #17161
traptor
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

I just dont see troad to contention if they re-sign rasmus.




Locked up long term our core will be:
Kadri
Huberdeau
Coronato
Sharangovich

Andersson
Weegar
Bahl (presumably)
Parehk (presumably)



Wolf


And no other A+ prospects in the system and not real avenue to bottom out unless by fluke.


It feels like a very middling group to me.
traptor is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to traptor For This Useful Post:
Old 06-14-2025, 06:58 PM   #17162
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
Here’s a long time rumour now confirmed
In his interview with 960 Coates confirms the Flames had an option to trade Gilmour for Verbeek 1:1 instead of going with the leafs deal
wow I didn’t even know that.

That’s a heck of a thing.
ComixZone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2025, 07:01 PM   #17163
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by traptor View Post
I just dont see troad to contention if they re-sign rasmus.




Locked up long term our core will be:
Kadri
Huberdeau
Coronato
Sharangovich

Andersson
Weegar
Bahl (presumably)
Parehk (presumably)



Wolf


And no other A+ prospects in the system and not real avenue to bottom out unless by fluke.


It feels like a very middling group to me.
That’s why they play the games. No point in predicting the next decade based on one signing. Lots of games, picks, trades, signings, etc on the way.

I just don’t understand this defeatist mentality. Everything the Flames do feels like a choice in some people’s eyes between doing the right thing and dooming the franchise for another 30 years. It’s just not the way it actually works.

No harm in letting literally every move play out, for years even, before trying to guess what impact it’s going to have 5-10 years down the line.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Old 06-14-2025, 07:02 PM   #17164
Paulie Walnuts
Franchise Player
 
Paulie Walnuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Hanifin agreed to 7.5 asv deal and backed out its been confirmed by many insiders.

Lindholm was offered 8.7 aav.

They tried to sign Tanev up until his trade.

These are all from Lebrun. So yeah Edwards being the worst is spot on
Paulie Walnuts is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2025, 07:06 PM   #17165
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I'll be honest. I've loved Rasmus Andersson since before he was drafted and was one of my bingo card hits during his draft year. I've loved him as a Flame ever since. That being said, I don't see the fit signing him back here long term.

Flames have some serious players coming onto the team over the next two or three seasons. There's only soany spots.

Unless they're going to move Pachal and use Weegar on the left there's not a ton of space available moving forward. I'd prefer to utilize his value to make some waves elsewhere on the roster.

We will see I suppose.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-14-2025, 07:08 PM   #17166
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Yeah this place is insufferable.

I come for the insider updates and the few reasonable people that post here.

Sometimes entire pages are "This message is hidden..." posts.

But there isn't a better place to read up on Flames news and breaking stories.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Badgers Nose For This Useful Post:
Old 06-14-2025, 07:14 PM   #17167
traptor
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

You're right this place is insurrable. There's no discourse allowed. The second you start disagreeing with any of the speculated moves a group of you start harumphing.




I'll focus on the positive moves i want conroy to make.







I'm going to be very happy if Conroy trades Rasmus! I think that's a great move that would help lead us to our ultimate goal.

Last edited by traptor; 06-14-2025 at 07:20 PM.
traptor is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to traptor For This Useful Post:
Old 06-14-2025, 07:17 PM   #17168
traptor
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

One of the best things Conroy could do is sell Rasmums plus another vet at this deadline.


Would be really smart management.
traptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2025, 07:20 PM   #17169
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
Hanifin agreed to 7.5 asv deal and backed out its been confirmed by many insiders.

Lindholm was offered 8.7 aav.

They tried to sign Tanev up until his trade.

These are all from Lebrun. So yeah Edwards being the worst is spot on
This is not true.
The Flames took the deal off the table. Or at minimum it was mutual.

I also have no issue with trying to re-sign Tanev. Dude is awesome.

Last edited by Jiri Hrdina; 06-14-2025 at 07:23 PM.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 06-14-2025, 07:24 PM   #17170
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
That would have been a great looking trade until Verbeek bolted for the States. Don't think he'd have stayed too long in CGY. But that's a cool what could have been for that flames roster.
True but even if the 1:1 deal ended poorly, at least you don't have all the other parts of the deal that were just as bad, particularly dealing Macoun and Nattress.

The full deal was Leeman, Berube, Petit, Godynuik for Gilmour, Macoun, Nattress and Manderville.

Verbeek for Gimour would have been way better, and if Verbeek didn't want to be here, hopefully could have been flipped for something decent.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2025, 07:26 PM   #17171
Ped
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Yeah, that trade with Verbeek is a big deal, but as Jiri says, what happens to all the other assets? How does this affect the two franchises going forward?
Ped is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2025, 07:30 PM   #17172
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I'm still trying to imagine two mutant RW dwarfs reeking havoc. Having Fleury and Verbeek on the same team would give opposition players nightmares back then.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-14-2025, 07:33 PM   #17173
Paulie Walnuts
Franchise Player
 
Paulie Walnuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
This is not true.
The Flames took the deal off the table. Or at minimum it was mutual.

I also have no issue with trying to re-sign Tanev. Dude is awesome.
No they didn’t. He was ready to sign in November but we had a losing steak. They had a deal done in January agin he balked. You can go look it up. I provide the links before.

The flames got forced into selling. But that won’t fit your narrative.
Paulie Walnuts is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2025, 07:35 PM   #17174
Buff
Franchise Player
 
Buff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
Here’s a long time rumour now confirmed
In his interview with 960 Coates confirms the Flames had an option to trade Gilmour for Verbeek 1:1 instead of going with the leafs deal
That would have been a significantly better trade for Calgary yet they still weren't getting decent value for Gilmour in that trade either.
Buff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2025, 07:37 PM   #17175
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
No they didn’t. He was ready to sign in November but we had a losing steak. They had a deal done in January agin he balked. You can go look it up. I provide the links before.

The flames got forced into selling. But that won’t fit your narrative.
The fact that people are still criticising management for things that never happened is wild.

Get over it already. At this point it they should have signed/kept Lindholm and the rest. At least you guys would have something that actually happened to complain about.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Old 06-14-2025, 07:38 PM   #17176
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandman View Post
Weak draft or not, any one of Misa, Hagens, Frondell, Martin, Desnoyers, or O'Brien are worth backing up the truck for.
If we backup the truck for any of those players and Rossi is actually available for far less we are crazy. Rossi is already a 60 point center at the NHL level with the possibility to be even better. Half those centers I suspect are unlikely to be 60 point centers in the NHL.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2025, 07:42 PM   #17177
traptor
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

Whatever made them do it, it feels like selling lindholm and the rest was smart moves by Conroy.


I think selling Rasmus would be a continuation of savy moves.
traptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2025, 07:43 PM   #17178
Paulie Walnuts
Franchise Player
 
Paulie Walnuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
If we backup the truck for any of those players and Rossi is actually available for far less we are crazy. Rossi is already a 60 point center at the NHL level with the possibility to be even better. Half those centers I suspect are unlikely to be 60 point centers in the NHL.
Rossi can easily flake out. I’d rather spend assets on a 1C we can develop who isn’t a hobbit.

But you will cry regardless hating top 5 picks.
Paulie Walnuts is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2025, 07:44 PM   #17179
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
If we backup the truck for any of those players and Rossi is actually available for far less we are crazy. Rossi is already a 60 point center at the NHL level with the possibility to be even better. Half those centers I suspect are unlikely to be 60 point centers in the NHL.
I don’t dig into details of much draft stuff, but I did think it was weird seeing Desnoyers so high while guys like Laf, Mercer, Zary, and Bourque out paced him (Laf by a lot, the rest by a bit) and none of those guys have turned into even 60 point guys or bonafide #1s.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2025, 07:47 PM   #17180
really?
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by traptor View Post
One of the best things Conroy could do is sell Rasmums plus another vet at this deadline.


Would be really smart management.
I would agree, but that’s just my opinion. Opinions are like seeds, some grow into beautiful flowers, but thistles also start as seeds.

Dealing vets at this point depends on returns. If there isn’t a good futures deal on the table there is no point in moving guys just to get them out of here. The drawback is that current guys might block younger players, and waiting to deal with that at camp puts a team under pressure, and likely a disadvantage.

Agents would love to back a team into a corner to have to re-up a client rather than lose them for nothing or get pebbles in return. Conroy knows this and he won’t get caught in that game.
really? is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to really? For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:55 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy