Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-14-2025, 05:03 PM   #17141
Niemo
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Niemo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Must be a scary world when everything seems “insane.”

Your perspective is interesting, but don’t confuse it with reality. I think it lacks a lot of imagination to just believe that Conroy has lucked himself to where he is, saved only by players’ refusal to sign contracts that were allegedly much higher than the ones they ended up signing.

And hey, again, if you truly believe everyone is insane and not accepting reality and we’re only here because a dumb GM made dumb offers to dumb players that didn’t take the best they could get, well then golly, perhaps we should fire the GM, right?
Your comments are the same extreme in the other direction. To each their own. Facts are that Lindholm would be here for another 7 yrs at about 9MM.

Rasmus is worth more dealt as we need those key RHD minutes for Parekh and maybe Bru in a couple yrs.

3 years from now, are we really ok with Raz making 8MM on the 3rd pairing for another 5-6 yrs? Thats assuming Bru doesnt pass him as well.

Last edited by Niemo; 06-14-2025 at 05:07 PM.
Niemo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Niemo For This Useful Post:
Old 06-14-2025, 05:10 PM   #17142
Rhett44
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Rhett44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Guys, nothing with our team has changed.

If it wasnt for Lindholm and Hanifin saving us and saying no to us giving basically a blank cheque, we would have overpaid 2 more old players.

Things will never change with Murray at the helm. I have no doubt we will overpay for Rasmus now.
Rhett44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2025, 05:13 PM   #17143
Royle9
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Niemo View Post
Thanks Royle. Do you know if they called the meeting yo more talk about where he wants to be traded to (thus extension and bigger return) or to hammer out a deal?

Also, what do you mean explore UFA for Rasmus?

This sounds scary bad for the Flames.
I think it was to confirm where his head is at long term so they can finalize their plan for the draft. They still owe him another year, so they can’t just write him off and ignore the guy.

He wanted to confirm his long term plans and be transparent with Craig as well, so I think both sides know the direction they are going and we’ll find out likely at the draft.

There’s significant interest in Rasmus, so I would bet Craig likely shared some of the team’s interested to gauge his interest as it pertains to an extension as that would maximize his value.
I haven’t been told either way, only that going into the meeting it was very likely he wants to move on.

Last edited by Royle9; 06-14-2025 at 05:18 PM.
Royle9 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Royle9 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-14-2025, 05:25 PM   #17144
Groot
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Groot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhett44 View Post
Guys, nothing with our team has changed.

If it wasnt for Lindholm and Hanifin saving us and saying no to us giving basically a blank cheque, we would have overpaid 2 more old players.

Things will never change with Murray at the helm. I have no doubt we will overpay for Rasmus now.
What a fresh new take from you, one that hasn't been beaten to death.

https://twitter.com/user/status/1753182683184714113

Hmm so I guess Lindholm never saved the Flamss from themselves, but don't let that stop you from spouting that same thing over, and over, and over.
Groot is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Groot For This Useful Post:
Old 06-14-2025, 05:32 PM   #17145
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Groot View Post
What a fresh new take from you, one that hasn't been beaten to death.

https://twitter.com/user/status/1753182683184714113

Hmm so I guess Lindholm never saved the Flamss from themselves, but don't let that stop you from spouting that same thing over, and over, and over.
Well he saved them by wanting more $$

The Flames were (by all reports) offering a somewhat competitive offer that would look horrible right now

Look how Boston’s season went having Zad and Lindholm eating that much cap and suppose to be key contributors
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jason14h For This Useful Post:
Old 06-14-2025, 05:52 PM   #17146
Groot
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Groot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
Well he saved them by wanting more $$

The Flames were (by all reports) offering a somewhat competitive offer that would look horrible right now

Look how Boston’s season went having Zad and Lindholm eating that much cap and suppose to be key contributors
So the Flames didnt give him and Hanifin a blank cheque as other users have falsely claimed. Got it.
Groot is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Groot For This Useful Post:
Old 06-14-2025, 05:53 PM   #17147
Niemo
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Niemo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
Well he saved them by wanting more $$

The Flames were (by all reports) offering a somewhat competitive offer that would look horrible right now

Look how Boston’s season went having Zad and Lindholm eating that much cap and suppose to be key contributors
I agree, Jason. Lindholm and co saved Conroy. I think and want to trust that Conroy has learned from this. I really like Conroy. I just hope his nice guy nature has gotten harder from these lessons. I think he has *fingers crossed*.
Niemo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2025, 05:54 PM   #17148
Niemo
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Niemo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Thanks so much, Royle!
Niemo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Niemo For This Useful Post:
Old 06-14-2025, 05:54 PM   #17149
All In Good Time
First Line Centre
 
All In Good Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: I'm somewhere where I don't know where I am
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Niemo View Post
We got lucky that no one took the deals that were on the table. Imagine Lindholm still here at the rumored 9x8 for example. Markstrom would still be here and we wouldn't know what Wolf can be.
We have no clue what was offered in reality
What we do know is that we have signed way too many post apex contracts and haven’t gotten rid of anyone lately
All In Good Time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2025, 05:58 PM   #17150
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Would have been nice to keep Hanifin but that's here nor there. But a top LD wouldn't be much of a need if he had stayed.

Lindholm to me was always out of the door once Johnny and Tkachuk left. And his uninspired play reflected that before he got traded to Vancouver. He did us a favor not anchoring a ton of cap to him to stay. No way around it. But again, I believe he was always leaving once other players started leaving.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2025, 06:00 PM   #17151
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Niemo View Post
Your comments are the same extreme in the other direction. To each their own. Facts are that Lindholm would be here for another 7 yrs at about 9MM.

Rasmus is worth more dealt as we need those key RHD minutes for Parekh and maybe Bru in a couple yrs.

3 years from now, are we really ok with Raz making 8MM on the 3rd pairing for another 5-6 yrs? Thats assuming Bru doesnt pass him as well.
Someone who thinks conversation around how to manage an asset has devolved into the “insane” and “extreme” should stop talking about reality and facts.

The “facts” are that Lindholm isn’t here. The “facts” are that he was always willing to stay and the Flames didn’t keep him.

We’ll need those minutes if all of the following come true: Weegar suddenly can’t play on the left, Parekh becomes a 1st or 2nd pairing defenceman. Bruz becomes a 1st or second pairing defenceman. Aside from Weegar suddenly forgetting how to play on the left, what an amazing situation! Let’s hope it happens and, if and when it does, deal from a position of strength. Seems a lot smarter than basing any decision on what might happen 5 years from now. No team operates that way, and we shouldn’t be the first.

But if all of it happens will I still be ok with Ras making 8M? Well, if we’re just going on what might happen, the cap could be as high as 129M, which would make that equivalent to 5.4M in today’s cap.

That’s… fine. Especially when Kadri is off the books and Huberdeau and Weegar are off the year after. Pretty easy actually.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
Well he saved them by wanting more $$

The Flames were (by all reports) offering a somewhat competitive offer that would look horrible right now

Look how Boston’s season went having Zad and Lindholm eating that much cap and suppose to be key contributors
Isn’t Boston what people want? Bottom five team! Woohoo!
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2025, 06:03 PM   #17152
Rhett44
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Rhett44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Niemo View Post
I agree, Jason. Lindholm and co saved Conroy. I think and want to trust that Conroy has learned from this. I really like Conroy. I just hope his nice guy nature has gotten harder from these lessons. I think he has *fingers crossed*.
Yep, Lindholm and Hanifin saved us. We should be thanking them.

Alot of people are clearly fine with doing the same thing we always do though. They want to continue to enjoy 1 playoff series win every decade. Because they don't have the patience for a rebuild.

It is what it is.
Rhett44 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Rhett44 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-14-2025, 06:08 PM   #17153
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhett44 View Post
Yep, Lindholm and Hanifin saved us. We should be thanking them.

Alot of people are clearly fine with doing the same thing we always do though. They want to continue to enjoy 1 playoff series win every decade. Because they don't have the patience for a rebuild.

It is what it is.
No people are not fine with doing the same thing.

The disagreement is more that some people see that the team HAS changed their approach. You don't. That's fine. But at least try to make an effort to understand what others are writing.

Posts like above are just junk.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2025, 06:09 PM   #17154
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhett44 View Post
Yep, Lindholm and Hanifin saved us. We should be thanking them.

Alot of people are clearly fine with doing the same thing we always do though. They want to continue to enjoy 1 playoff series win every decade. Because they don't have the patience for a rebuild.

It is what it is.
Are they? Or do they just have a different perspective on how to build a team than you do?

I’m sure one answer makes you feel smarter, but it doesn’t do much more than that for anyone else.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Old 06-14-2025, 06:21 PM   #17155
YyjFlames
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by All In Good Time View Post
We have no clue what was offered in reality
What we do know is that we have signed way too many post apex contracts and haven’t gotten rid of anyone lately
Hold up. I’m typically the guy that defends Treleving as I think he took the shot he could and unfortunately missed, but he’s the guy that signed all the old guys. Which post apex contracts has Conroy signed?

Backlund.

That’s it. And it was for two years. And a good signing.

Weegar? If that’s a post apex deal at that dollar value and term, I’ll take 10 more Weegars.

Coronato? Come on.

You need to step back and see where this team is trending (and think about what a big deal moving Markstrom was last year). Maybe, as some have argued, Conroy tried to re-sign the older guys and didn’t, but the old guys on this roster aren’t on him. Perhaps he could have put more pressure on Kadri to waive his no trade clause and move him, but that’s a big rock the boat move way too early in this competition cycle that would probably significantly hinder his ability to sign future free agents.

It still sounds far more likely that Andersson gets moved than stays anyway.
YyjFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2025, 06:22 PM   #17156
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Lamenting how a pro sports organization refuses to do something that is not in their genetic make up is such a crazy way to drown , fighting against the current.
You live longer if you just let go and go with the flow.

Flames won't go scorched earth. It's not how they're made .
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-14-2025, 06:27 PM   #17157
All In Good Time
First Line Centre
 
All In Good Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: I'm somewhere where I don't know where I am
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YyjFlames View Post
Hold up. I’m typically the guy that defends Treleving as I think he took the shot he could and unfortunately missed, but he’s the guy that signed all the old guys. Which post apex contracts has Conroy signed?

Backlund.

That’s it. And it was for two years. And a good signing.

Weegar? If that’s a post apex deal at that dollar value and term, I’ll take 10 more Weegars.

Coronato? Come on.

You need to step back and see where this team is trending (and think about what a big deal moving Markstrom was last year). Maybe, as some have argued, Conroy tried to re-sign the older guys and didn’t, but the old guys on this roster aren’t on him. Perhaps he could have put more pressure on Kadri to waive his no trade clause and move him, but that’s a big rock the boat move way too early in this competition cycle that would probably significantly hinder his ability to sign future free agents.

It still sounds far more likely that Andersson gets moved than stays anyway.

Oh boy

Sorry

Shoulda used green text I suppose
All In Good Time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2025, 06:37 PM   #17158
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Here’s a long time rumour now confirmed
In his interview with 960 Coates confirms the Flames had an option to trade Gilmour for Verbeek 1:1 instead of going with the leafs deal
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 06-14-2025, 06:39 PM   #17159
really?
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Are they? Or do they just have a different perspective on how to build a team than you do?

I’m sure one answer makes you feel smarter, but it doesn’t do much more than that for anyone else.
Your question is valid and should cause posters to at least stop and think. It’s fairly myopic to suggest that advocating for signing Andersson can only equate to asking for more of the same. My opinion is that a long term $8m per year with Andersson would immediately become an albatross, but I’m not in the room or on the bench so I can’t say what he really brings to the team, and the extent to which his performance may be impacted by injuries. Maybe extending him is of greater value to the future than any deal, but I would trust current management to make that call.

I’m in the camp that feels like the Flames should take the best offer they get for Andersson, and the best offer should center around picks, but I fully understand that such a deal has a chance to become Iginla deal II. We as fans have the luxury of fading into the forest if that happens, Craig Conroy does not.
really? is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to really? For This Useful Post:
Old 06-14-2025, 06:41 PM   #17160
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
Here’s a long time rumour now confirmed
In his interview with 960 Coates confirms the Flames had an option to trade Gilmour for Verbeek 1:1 instead of going with the leafs deal
That would have been a great looking trade until Verbeek bolted for the States. Don't think he'd have stayed too long in CGY. But that's a cool what could have been for that flames roster.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:16 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy