[PGT] Scoringoalvich 2, Green Bags of Grease 3 in SO

[D as in David]

Originally Posted by Inferno

https://twitter.com/user/status/1735527912726503618

Yeah, pretty much the way I saw it the first time. Thanks!

[ComixZone]

[TrentCrimmIndependent]

It's OK, we'll concede the extra point to Minnesota for the purposes of blocking Edmonton out of the wildcard.

[memphusk]

Wait until Calgarys next great player reaches 80 points and then tells the team he wants more than Huberdeau. Yikes.

[Willi Plett]

Originally Posted by cannon7

Half expected Huberdeau to pass it during the SO.

Wait, that was a pass.

[combustiblefuel]

Originally Posted by dammage79

You've been very vocal about your disdain for Huby this past week.

So should you.

10.5 million a year. .... compare that to players that are producing at half or less than that combined. It's not like this is his first year here. 2 #### seasons ( 1.5) . Tied in points with a kid playing his first year...

That's a waste of 10.5 when that in theory could find 3 players for the same price to each have his point totals.

He is 11th on the team for point totals. The top 2 make what he makes total.

You could spend that 10.5 on 2 more players that are Kadri or Lindholm
Or 3 more players like like sharky,elias and Colman with money saved.

Etc etc etc ....

Having to sign him was a pressure move. Conroy panicked as it was his first move. It bite him in the ass which is why he may be more stubborn going foreward.

[iamca]

Originally Posted by gvitaly

Sharangovich in the shootout: 3 for 4
The rest of the Flames: 0 for 12!

Why would Huska not try 2 different players in the SO instead of the guys that keep failing?!?

Keep doing the same thing and expecting a different result is the definition of insanity, be better than that.

I don’t care if you rotate through all the D and then Scoringoalvich every 4th round, they would have a better chance.

[D as in David]

Originally Posted by combustiblefuel

Having to sign him was a pressure move. Conroy panicked as it was his first move. It bite him in the ass which is why he may be more stubborn going foreward.

Are you talking about Huberdeau? Conroy didn't sign him, Treliving did.

[AC]

nm already posted

[Textcritic]

Originally Posted by iamca

Keep doing the same thing and expecting a different result is the definition of insanity.

No. This is not the definition of insanity.


Sent from my SM-G986W using Tapatalk

[SuperMatt18]

Originally Posted by combustiblefuel

So should you.

10.5 million a year. .... compare that to players that are producing at half or less than that combined. It's not like this is his first year here. 2 #### seasons ( 1.5) . Tied in points with a kid playing his first year...

That's a waste of 10.5 when that in theory could find 3 players for the same price to each have his point totals.

He is 11th on the team for point totals. The top 2 make what he makes total.

You could spend that 10.5 on 2 more players that are Kadri or Lindholm
Or 3 more players like like sharky,elias and Colman with money saved.

Etc etc etc ....

Having to sign him was a pressure move. Conroy panicked as it was his first move. It bite him in the ass which is why he may be more stubborn going foreward.

Conroy didn't sign Huberdeau, Treliving did

[VANFLAMESFAN]

Originally Posted by Inferno

https://twitter.com/user/status/1735527912726503618

If the rule says it has to be a 'rebound' for the second touch to be considered illegal, then that's a stupid rule that really should be changed or clarified better.

In theory, if a guy is deking(and not shooting causing a rebound), a goalie could take a big swipe, make full contact with the puck and if the puck goes off the players shin and bounces favoruably, he can tuck it and score and it would be allowed. Picture my scenario and think how stupid that would be if it were allowed.

Goalie's touch of the puck should kill the play in my eyes.

[Cecil Terwilliger]

I thought it was pretty clearly a good goal. Vladar barely touched it, it wasn’t a shot and was moving laterally. The article along with that clip breaks it down well and outlines why it was called a goal.

[VANFLAMESFAN]

Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger

I thought it was pretty clearly a good goal. Vladar barely touched it, it wasn’t a shot and was moving laterally. The article along with that clip breaks it down well and outlines why it was called a goal.

But if he got a better touch on it and it still landed on the guy's stick, he could still score. It shouldn't matter what kind of touch Vladar got on it.

There shouldn't be grey area. Vladar touched it. That should kill the play.

I understand that's not what the rule says, I'm saying the rule is silly.

[Goriders]

Really liking pospisil. He’s turning into a real crap disturber.

Good to see!!

Sharangovich and Coleman are on fire.

[DeluxeMoustache]

Huberdeau isn’t missing. His weak cough up led to goal 1

Rasmus *is* missing, notably ... From the shootout lineup! #### sakes, Huska, he was 2/4 last year and while the entire team this year not named Sharangovich is 0-for across the board.

(To be fair, Huby was 4/7 last year too. Maybe he’s due)

[DeluxeMoustache]

Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger

I thought it was pretty clearly a good goal. Vladar barely touched it, it wasn’t a shot and was moving laterally. The article along with that clip breaks it down well and outlines why it was called a goal.

It’s simple.

It’s a goal because it’s against the Flames

50/50 turns in to 98/2

Same reason Forsberg can somehow just throw the puck out front over the net from behind. Same reason the NHL calls in on a Coleman skate blade touch. Flames had to trade Bennett to reduce disallowed goal calls

Don’t try to reason, don’t argue. Just accept it

Blame Wideman

They got caught out on the step change in penalties by Burke, so just turned to stacking disputable calls

[DeluxeMoustache]

Originally Posted by FanIn80

Official Shootout Report: https://www.nhl.com/scores/htmlrepor...4/SO020450.HTM

Shot #1: Result: Goal; Shot Type: Wrist

They're calling it a wrist shot goal... meaning the deke attempt, which Vladaar got a piece of, wasn't considered an attempt at all. It was just something that happened on the way to him ultimately shooting it in the net.

You'd think that would open up a whole can of worms on players now being allowed to tap in failed deke attempts, but I imagine the next time this happens it will be ruled no goal as if tonight had never happened.

It should be clean. Puck is ineligible for redirection after the goalie touches it

[Barnet Flame]

I had to watch on the Minnesota feed. Their commentators more than give the Oilers a run for their money in homerism. All through the game they made me want the Flames to feed the Wild their ####ing lunch with the fury of a thousand suns.

Even they were shocked when Zuccarello’s goal was given.

If I hadn’t 43 years worth of emotional investment in the Flames, I’d be ####ing done with this ####ing joke of a league.

[AFireInside]

Originally Posted by Flamesfan05

Since he had zero point in the last 7 games, I am pretty sure there are a lot of things he is supposed to do better…. Especially for what they are paying him.

I don't disagree. I also watched him set up a couple tap ins last game that the Flames couldn't finish on, and he set up 3 or 4 great chances to night that they couldn't convert. That's what a passer is supposed to do. He gave Lindholm an open net last game on the PP, and he missed.

He needs to be better, so does every other Flame particularly every player on the PP. Nowhere have I said that Huberdeau is playing well, I'm saying the hatred is hilariously over the top on this board.