Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-29-2015, 10:56 PM   #121
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stone hands View Post
i dont know why the flames always play so scared vs anahiem and st louis
I didn't really see them as scared or outsized or anything. Just have no answer for the teams that clog the neutral zone
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post:
Old 12-29-2015, 10:56 PM   #122
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
who was counting the chances the shot tracker from LA


Flames didn't have a great game but they certainly had more than 3 chances
War-on-ice agrees with hockeystats' numbers. Flames had three shots on net in the home plate, plus 1 missed shot in the home plate and seven shot attempts blocked in the home plate.
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2015, 10:57 PM   #123
Jayems
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
who was counting the chances the shot tracker from LA


Flames didn't have a great game but they certainly had more than 3 chances

AND THE DUCKS HAD 19 CHANCES ON 21 SHOTS LOL
3 chances at even strength. seems about right.

19 on 21 does not, however.
Jayems is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2015, 11:00 PM   #124
heep223
Could Care Less
 
heep223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default Ducks 1 Flames 0

Chances have nothing to do with shots. A team could have 100 chances and 3 shots on goal. They certainly could have had 19 chances and 21 shots.

Regardless, in my eyes this game was more or less an even battle. Credit the Ducks they played a veteran road game, got a few good bounces and played a yawn inducing style. I can see why they suck this year.
heep223 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to heep223 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-29-2015, 11:00 PM   #125
zamler
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Some of you watched a different game Calgary generated very little offensively and didn't have the puck nearly enough. The Ducks shut down the Flames breakout game to perfection, Hartley has no answer when teams do this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
who was counting the chances the shot tracker from LA


Flames didn't have a great game but they certainly had more than 3 chances

AND THE DUCKS HAD 19 CHANCES ON 21 SHOTS LOL
Uh you don't seem to understand how these stats work.
zamler is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to zamler For This Useful Post:
Old 12-29-2015, 11:05 PM   #126
tvp2003
Franchise Player
 
tvp2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Waive Raymond, then send him to Stockton. Call up Grant.
Hudler, and Colborne out.
Grant, Jooris in.

Gaudreau - Monahan - Ferland
Bennett - Granlund - Jooris
Bouma - Stajan - Jones
Grant - Backlund - Bollig
tvp2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tvp2003 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-29-2015, 11:09 PM   #127
hockey.modern
First Line Centre
 
hockey.modern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Hudler should not ever play on the top line until he gets his act together.
__________________
Sam "Beard" Bennett
hockey.modern is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to hockey.modern For This Useful Post:
Old 12-29-2015, 11:10 PM   #128
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

Respect Wideman!
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2015, 11:13 PM   #129
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Honestly, Hudler should sit for a couple games. No need to have someone that looks that bad out there.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Caged Great For This Useful Post:
Old 12-29-2015, 11:14 PM   #130
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

My brother is bad luck! When he decides to fly home for Christmas I always get us a pair of tickets to a Flames games and we end up losing. He hopes that next year he can break the streak of bad luck
__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2015, 11:18 PM   #131
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler View Post
Some of you watched a different game Calgary generated very little offensively and didn't have the puck nearly enough. The Ducks shut down the Flames breakout game to perfection, Hartley has no answer when teams do this.

Uh you don't seem to understand how these stats work.
That scrap at the end of the game should have happened and the end of the first. Maybe that would have sparked some life into the Flames.
__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dion For This Useful Post:
Old 12-29-2015, 11:22 PM   #132
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler View Post
Some of you watched a different game Calgary generated very little offensively and didn't have the puck nearly enough. The Ducks shut down the Flames breakout game to perfection, Hartley has no answer when teams do this.

Uh you don't seem to understand how these stats work.
I don't think anyone is saying the Flames played a great game...they were still one post away from 3 on 3 overtime

Ducks didn't have any real chances in the 3rd and very few throughout the game...if the qualification for these latest fancy stats is shots in the slot well maybe but they certainly didn't have 19 scoring chances by any real hockey logic
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2015, 11:27 PM   #133
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I'm somewhere in the middle, I think the Flames were definitely outchanced to a frustrating level, but 19-3? Both of those numbers seem too extreme in either direction.
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
Old 12-29-2015, 11:33 PM   #134
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

War-on-ice's actual count has 21-10 (ES scoring chances) and 12-6 (ES High-danger chances). But it's true that we only got three shots through to the net from the home plate.
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2015, 11:35 PM   #135
Chingas
First Line Centre
 
Chingas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: About 5200 Miles from the Dome
Exp:
Default

I think that the issue with our inability to solve the trap is that we keep trying to pass it up the middle of the ice. We needed more movement up the boards and play a more North South game. Too many of our east west passes were picked off. Additionally we try to force a pass to someone in front of the net that has three guys on him already. That works 1 in a 1000.

I thought Ramo was really good tonight.

Russell is such a polarizing player to watch. Sometimes he does great things but it really seems like everytime we get stuck in our zone you can gaurantee that Russell is on the ice. Also how many times does he sit there with ample time to make a play and instead he hangs onto it for far too long and results in a clear attempt that gets turned over on the half boards.

Colborne just wasn't moving his feet tonight. I think that he may have had a talking to becasue he was much better in the last 25 minutes of the game. That being said the end result of a Colborne possesion is almost always going the other way recently. I really think that he could use a game from the sky to re-set.

I am really liking Hamitons game, it seems like contrary to Russell the vast majority of the times that he has the puck the end result is a good one.

I agree that Hudler was completely MIA in the last game but I thought that he appeared more engaged tonight.

Sam Bennett with another solid outing. One day the tides will turn for him. I like having Ferland on the PP and hope that Bennett will start to get more time.

When is Frolik due back? It can't be soon enough. Bouma has not been noticeable at all which is a good thing for a guy coming back from a serious injury, but we need some more relentless pressure on the team from some one other than Bennett. Jooris may be usefull in this regard as well.

Bollig hasn't played much lately but I think that given a few games to get some rhythm he may become much more useful. Sitting for so long and then brought out just for a game like this will pretty much insure that he stays a non factor. I know what time he is given he needs to perform with, but feel that he put himself in a place for a few opportunites tonight that he may have done more with had he been up to speed.
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.
Winston Churchill
Chingas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2015, 11:36 PM   #136
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
War-on-ice's actual count has 21-10 (ES scoring chances) and 12-6 (ES High-danger chances). But it's true that we only got three shots through to the net from the home plate.
Sorry but any stat that uses a baseball analogy is not for me

chances were about even, neither side had many good ones
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2015, 11:43 PM   #137
ScorchyScorch
Scoring Winger
 
ScorchyScorch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Exp:
Default

When the hell did the Ducks get 19 scoring chances?

Were the LA stats counters in the building for this one?
ScorchyScorch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ScorchyScorch For This Useful Post:
Old 12-29-2015, 11:43 PM   #138
OzSome
Franchise Player
 
OzSome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

There is a reason why Anaheim sucks this season so far. They played a boring clogging the ice type of game. They have players who can score (Perry, Getzlaf, Kesler and their mobile defensemen) but Boudreau chose to play a more defensive hockey game most of their game. Makes you wonder why Getzlaf only scored 2 goals so far. Tonight their boring defensive works and they stopped Johnny Hockey and Flames defensemen from making some plays but their style of play will not work all the time. I wish It was Ferland and not Wideman who started punching Kesler at the end and then beat up Getzlaf after. Oh well Flames lost tonight. They'll start another winning streak vs the Kings on Thursday then.
OzSome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2015, 11:44 PM   #139
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Sorry but any stat that uses a baseball analogy is not for me

chances were about even, neither side had many good ones
Bolded comes across as pedantic. These were the shot attempts in the game at ES:



That's not "about even" any way you slice it. Yeah, neither side had many good ones. You could even say the Flames played a solid defensive game. Until you compare with the Ducks who played an elite defensive game. And yeah, it was boring and ugly. But it wasn't even.

If you need a legend:

B - Blocked
M - Missed
S - Shot
G - Goal
Italicized - Very soon after entering the zone (i.e. a rush chance)

Last edited by GranteedEV; 12-29-2015 at 11:58 PM.
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
Old 12-29-2015, 11:57 PM   #140
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
Bolded comes across as pedantic. These were the shot attempts in the game at ES:



That's not "about even" any way you slice it.
we could go back and forth all day...I watched the game with my own eyes and the Ducks had a few chances in the 2nd and basically none after they scored their goal. If you are trying to prove they got more shots from the slot area than fine

Last edited by dino7c; 12-30-2015 at 12:00 AM.
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:36 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy