Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-12-2014, 01:05 PM   #121
Day Tripper
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Chair
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
He got five games (in case that wasn't posted here), Monahan got 10 games last year so I wouldn't put too much into it in regards to truculence.
Bennett is constantly aggressive, mucking it up after whistles, etc. He's a pitbull.
Day Tripper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2014, 01:07 PM   #122
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Day Tripper View Post
Bennett is constantly aggressive, mucking it up after whistles, etc. He's a pitbull.

Sounds like exactly the type of player we need.

He might be out of our range though unfortunately. I doubt he falls outside the top 3.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2014, 01:07 PM   #123
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

From most accounts Monahan played pretty physical in junior too.

Think that part of his game just hasn't translated since he isn't physically mature enough to be running at NHL d-men yet and is smart enough to know it.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2014, 01:12 PM   #124
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
Well Monahan's was the OHL mandatory 10 for a headshot, no matter the circumstances. Bennett cross checked a guy in the face there's a difference there.
There isn't a mandatory 10 game suspension in the OHL for headshots.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2014, 01:20 PM   #125
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
There isn't a mandatory 10 game suspension in the OHL for headshots.
hmm I thought there was, I know they did a major crackdown on it. Regardless, this was his suspension hit. A crosscheck to the face is more outright vicious in intent in my books, regardless of outcome.

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2014, 01:29 PM   #126
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

I think Buffalo is a sure thing for offence. They likely take Reinhart 1st overall.

After that the order is gonna get messy.

Oilers are playing better so I hope they screw themselves out of Ekblad. So the Panthers likely get the 2nd position, they need Ekblad and are already deep with young centers.

The Islanders will likely pick 3rd, Bennett a possibility but I think they'll either trade down or reach for a dman.

1. Sabres - Sam Reinhart
2. Panthers - Aaron Ekblad
3. Islanders - Leon Draisaitl
4. Flames - Sam Bennett
5. Oilers - Nick Ritchie
Da_Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2014, 01:37 PM   #127
Scoutski
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Scoutski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Exp:
Default

Having a look at the remaining schedules, I feel like the standings aren't likely to change at the bottom here, Islanders have a reasonable schedule and should be able to win more than the Flames. It will be pretty hard for either Florida or the Oilers to take over the Flames though and it really might just come down to the head-to-head games against those opponents.

I think we pick 4th and Reinhart, Ekblad and Bennett will be gone which leaves us with Draisaitl or Dal Colle (or someone else?). I think following that logic Draisatl will be a Flame...

For those curious, here are the remaining schedules:

Islanders (15 games)
Opponents: San Jose, Buffalo, Minnesota, Columbus, Carolina, Tampa Bay, New Jersey, Floriday, Ottawa, Washington, Columbus, Ottawa, Montreal, New Jersey, Buffalo
Games against Playoff teams: 6
Games against Non-Playoff teams: 9

Florida (17 games)
Opponents: Tampa Bay, New Jersey, Vancouver, San Jose, Phoenix, Los Angeles, Anaheim, Ottawa, Carolina, Montreal, New Jersey, NY Islanders, Calgary, Dallas, Philadelphia, Toronto, Columbus
Games against Playoff teams: 9
Games against Non-Playoff teams: 8

Oilers (16 games)
Opponents: St Louis, Detroit, Carolina, Nashville, Buffalo, Calgary, San Jose, Anaheim, NY Rangers, San Jose, Anaheim, Phoenix, Anaheim, Colorado, Los Angeles, Vancouver
Games against Playoff teams: 9
Games against Non-Playoff teams: 7

Flames (17 games)
Opponents: Anaheim, Dallas, Phoenix, Buffalo, Nashville, Edmonton, San Jose, Anaheim, NY Rangers, Ottawa, Toronto, Tampa Bay, Florida, New Jersey, Los Angeles, Winnipeg, Vancouver
Games against Playoff teams: 8
Games against Non-Playoff teams: 9
Scoutski is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Scoutski For This Useful Post:
Old 03-12-2014, 01:51 PM   #128
The Yen Man
Franchise Player
 
The Yen Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Wow, this is like last year all over again. I know it sucks to be a bottom feeder team, but I guess I get a different sort of enjoyment out of it with all the scoreboard watching. Instead constantly scoreboard watching and hoping certain teams lose so they fall out of the playoff race, I'm now hoping for certain teams to win in order to leap ahead of the Flames. Weird times.
The Yen Man is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Yen Man For This Useful Post:
Old 03-12-2014, 01:54 PM   #129
The Fonz
Our Jessica Fletcher
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Changing it to games against top 10 teams, and adding Home:Away...

Islanders - 15 games (8H:7A)
Opponents: San Jose, Buffalo, Minnesota, Columbus, Carolina, Tampa Bay, New Jersey, Floriday, Ottawa, Washington, Columbus, Ottawa, Montreal, New Jersey, Buffalo
Games against Top-10: 2
Games against Bottom-20: 13

Florida - 17 games (10H:7A)
Opponents: Tampa Bay, New Jersey, Vancouver, San Jose, Phoenix, Los Angeles, Anaheim, Ottawa, Carolina, Montreal, New Jersey, NY Islanders, Calgary, Dallas, Philadelphia, Toronto, Columbus
Games against Top-10: 4
Games against Bottom-20: 13

Flames - 17 games (8H:9A)
Opponents: Anaheim, Dallas, Phoenix, Buffalo, Nashville, Edmonton, San Jose, Anaheim, NY Rangers, Ottawa, Toronto, Tampa Bay, Florida, New Jersey, Los Angeles, Winnipeg, Vancouver
Games against Top-10: 5
Games against Bottom-20: 12

Oilers - 16 games (10H:6A)
Opponents: St Louis, Detroit, Carolina, Nashville, Buffalo, Calgary, San Jose, Anaheim, NY Rangers, San Jose, Anaheim, Phoenix, Anaheim, Colorado, Los Angeles, Vancouver
Games against Top-10: 8
Games against Bottom-20: 8


Don't see the Oilers catching us. Florida will pass us I think, and NYI will distance themselves.
The Fonz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to The Fonz For This Useful Post:
Old 03-12-2014, 02:05 PM   #130
Mass_nerder
Franchise Player
 
Mass_nerder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barthelona
Exp:
Default

I saw Virtanen last night against the lowly hurricanes, and was not overly impressed (not unimpressed though). He was a non factor for the first half of the game, but he didn't seem to be getting much ice time. He did have a goal (might have been the winning goal) that was a result of driving hard to the net and deflecting a nice hard pass into the net. His skating was the most noticeable thing I saw...good speed and really good edgework, especially on the forecheck.
I'm not sure if he's a great pick for where we'll (probably) be picking, but I wouldn't be unhappy to have him in our system.
Mass_nerder is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mass_nerder For This Useful Post:
Old 03-12-2014, 02:23 PM   #131
Scoutski
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Scoutski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Exp:
Default

Out of curiosity, I recall Feaster made a big deal out of whoever they drafted needed to be NHL ready straight out of the gates. On the otherside of it, I have come to believe that Burke is a big believer in working your way up and probably wouldn't have much problem sending someone back to junior.

Out of all these guys, who is likely to stay up (or is it all of them)?
Scoutski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2014, 02:23 PM   #132
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

If you don't mind, please do Top 20 and Bottom 10. That will give more of an indication cuz those top 20 will be battling for playoff spot or seeding.
Da_Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2014, 02:26 PM   #133
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Yeah Oilers have a tough remaining schedule and are the Kings of tanking, if Buffalo wasn't 8 points behind already they might have had a shot at catching them.

Florida is the best chance to catch us. Luongo makes them better, and they have the easiest remaining schedule.

Islanders are another possibility. They are a better roster then they had shown earlier this season and the players will have a chip on their shoulders to prove that they are not just Tavares, might get a little bit of the Ewing Theory working with him out.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2014, 02:27 PM   #134
SeanCharles
First Line Centre
 
SeanCharles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

I've only seen Reinhart and Ekblad play but from what I've researched I would say if we can't draft either of those two or Bennett maybe we should trade the pick for an asset and a lower pick and draft Fleury..
SeanCharles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2014, 02:33 PM   #135
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scoutski View Post
Out of curiosity, I recall Feaster made a big deal out of whoever they drafted needed to be NHL ready straight out of the gates. On the otherside of it, I have come to believe that Burke is a big believer in working your way up and probably wouldn't have much problem sending someone back to junior.

Out of all these guys, who is likely to stay up (or is it all of them)?
I'd imagine Ekblad is the most NHL ready considering he was decent at the WJC and is the most physically developed of the top prospects. Arguably the rest should go back. But crappy teams like BUF, NYI, EDM, and FLA may keep them up (and arguably it will be a mistake.)

Last edited by Flames Draft Watcher; 03-12-2014 at 02:35 PM.
Flames Draft Watcher is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2014, 02:34 PM   #136
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanCharles View Post
I've only seen Reinhart and Ekblad play but from what I've researched I would say if we can't draft either of those two or Bennett maybe we should trade the pick for an asset and a lower pick and draft Fleury..
Why is that? Fleury doesn't seem to have a higher upside than some of the other forwards available like Dal Colle, Draisaitl, etc.
Flames Draft Watcher is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2014, 02:37 PM   #137
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Yeah, trading down for positional need is a mistake that would take us back into Sutter territory. Take the best guy we can and sort out overloaded positions later.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2014, 02:50 PM   #138
Wolfman
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Saving the world one gif at a time
Exp:
Default

Buffalo could have 2 picks in the top 5. They could take Ekblad at 1 and a forward with their second pick from Islanders. That's disturbing.
Wolfman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2014, 02:52 PM   #139
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfman View Post
Buffalo could have 2 picks in the top 5. They could take Ekblad at 1 and a forward with their second pick from Islanders. That's disturbing.
Actually, more disturbing is that the Islanders are going to likely keep that pick and give up next years. And since the Sabres are setting themselves up for Epic Tank next season, they might have two top 5's in a better draft.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2014, 02:55 PM   #140
Wolfman
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Saving the world one gif at a time
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
Actually, more disturbing is that the Islanders are going to likely keep that pick and give up next years. And since the Sabres are setting themselves up for Epic Tank next season, they might have two top 5's in a better draft.
Gross
Wolfman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:39 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy