Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-30-2024, 11:20 AM   #81
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
Sharangovich isn't some consistent 30 goal scorer though. He did it once in a year with a career high shooting percentage. He might only be a 20 goal scorer on average whose line generally gets outscored significantly at even strength.

I would definitely think he is better than he has shown this season. What has changed this year? Coming off injury and a big new multi year contract.
That'd be terrific. And what he's paid for IMO. Can't speak to being outscored significantly in NJD and I won't go by his +/-. I watched him with the Devils a fair bit. I liked his game there. I think he'll get back to his usual self next year. Which dovetails to the second bolded. He hasn't recovered. I'm certain it was a high ankle sprain. He should be sitting. He can go, but we're seeing the result of a guy at 60% health IMO.

Could it be contract pressure? I suppose, it happens with players in that first year of a big deal, but given the injury I'm more likely to point at that.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2024, 11:30 AM   #82
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

The difference between decent players and top-line players is consistency. A lot of really skilled guys in the NHL can’t produce consistently. Whether it’s inconsistent effort, concentration, or confidence, they go on runs for 10 games where they look great, and then they’re flat for 20 games.

Every roster has players like that. They’re complementary, but they’ll never be core guys on a good team. Kuzmenko clearly fits the bill. Remains to be seen if Sharangovich is the same.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
Old 12-30-2024, 11:34 AM   #83
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
The difference between decent players and top-line players is consistency. A lot of really skilled guys in the NHL can’t produce consistently. Whether it’s inconsistent effort, concentration, or confidence, they go on runs for 10 games where they look great, and then they’re flat for 20 games.

Every roster has players like that. They’re complementary, but they’ll never be core guys on a good team. Kuzmenko clearly fits the bill. Remains to be seen if Sharangovich is the same.
There was a handful of posters this summer that legitimately wanted to extend Kuzmenko to his retirement contract at 29 years old. That would have been frightening. We could have had this guy for 4-6 years at like $6mil+
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jayswin For This Useful Post:
Old 12-30-2024, 12:03 PM   #84
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
100%. But the context that we DO have is that the Flames have the worst percentage.

Considering that it is 15 years of data, I would assume that the average time per 5 on 3 is largely evened out for all teams. Until we see the data we don't know, but the baseline assumption would be that all teams would be pretty close for time per PP opportunity.
Yes, but we don't know what the average percentage is. We only know that 19% is at the bottom of whatever the range is.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2024, 12:05 PM   #85
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin View Post
There was a handful of posters this summer that legitimately wanted to extend Kuzmenko to his retirement contract at 29 years old. That would have been frightening. We could have had this guy for 4-6 years at like $6mil+
Some were very vocal about it and how great of an idea it was. I was saying it was going to be Neal 2.0 and one of them was saying he would challenge for a 100 points and the contract would be a steal
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2024, 01:40 PM   #86
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
Yes, but we don't know what the average percentage is. We only know that 19% is at the bottom of whatever the range is.
Range: 19.4% (CGY) to 36.1% BOS

Average: 27.4%

Opportunities: 101 - 163 (CGY 18th 129)

Average: 132

TOI: 78.4 - 130.2 (CGY 101.4 17th)

Average: 105.3

Total goals: 21 - 57 (CGY 25 28th)

Average: 36.3

There you go. Flames get average chances and about average time, but have scored among the fewest goals and have the worst production rate, with only 2 teams under 20% (CGY, BUF) and 9 teams over 30%

Now, can we call them terrible? Because it's pretty terrible.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 12-30-2024, 02:17 PM   #87
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Now, can we call them terrible? Because it's pretty terrible.
I didn't need any of those fancy stats to know they ware bad at 5 on 3. I don't even get excited for them anymore
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2024, 02:24 PM   #88
Paulie Walnuts
Franchise Player
 
Paulie Walnuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Say no more. Being in a category with Buffalo usually means you are terrible at something.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2024, 03:00 PM   #89
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Range: 19.4% (CGY) to 36.1% BOS

Average: 27.4%

Opportunities: 101 - 163 (CGY 18th 129)

Average: 132

TOI: 78.4 - 130.2 (CGY 101.4 17th)

Average: 105.3

Total goals: 21 - 57 (CGY 25 28th)

Average: 36.3

There you go. Flames get average chances and about average time, but have scored among the fewest goals and have the worst production rate, with only 2 teams under 20% (CGY, BUF) and 9 teams over 30%

Now, can we call them terrible? Because it's pretty terrible.
Yes, now we can call them terrible, because we have numbers for context.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2024, 06:12 PM   #90
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
Some were very vocal about it and how great of an idea it was. I was saying it was going to be Neal 2.0 and one of them was saying he would challenge for a 100 points and the contract would be a steal
Oh yeah, I remember that thread. This is not meant as a gotcha on any posters, but more just a "wow, how far has this guy fallen" look back.


Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
Don’t trade Andrei Kuzmenko.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
4x$7M or thereabouts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
I would take 2 2nds for him. Unless he is pacing at like 40 plus goals, a 1st it is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FBI View Post
40 goal scorers don’t grow on trees. Tough crowd
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
On a good team, they’d be one of the most legit second lines in the league.

As it stands, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to expect 90-100 goals from that trio this season.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
Really?

What if he extends for three years @ $7M?

You can always trade him later - it’s harder to find a desperate team who will trade you a 40 goal scorer as a cap dump.

They can’t just play Huberdeau, Kadri, Weegar, and Sharangovich with a bunch of rookies and dudes on 1-year contracts/ELCs.

That’s no way to run a hockey team.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snuffleupagus View Post
Since he's never played a playoff game it's nice to see Francis rolling his crystal thru a pile of poop again, I remember another Russian who these "experts" said couldn't bring it in the playoffs but by the time he was Kuzmenko's age he was a playoff beast, his name was Pavel Datsyuk.

You can't teach the type of skill Kuzmenko has, it only takes a couple of these rare skilled plays to win a playoff series.

With the cap increasing give him 4 X $6.5
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
edmonton is no good


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:37 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy