06-30-2014, 12:51 PM
|
#61
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Saving the world one gif at a time
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss
Darren Dreger @DarrenDreger 2m
The Flames were aggressive pre-draft. Offered to take on Mike Ribeiro for 12th pick (Ribeiro wouldn't waive). Ultimately, he was bought out.
|
Thank god!!!!
__________________
|
|
|
|
06-30-2014, 12:52 PM
|
#62
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Well, we dodged an atomic bomb on that one.
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2014, 12:54 PM
|
#63
|
|
Franchise Player
|
...we would have just bought him out ourselves and would have got the 12th overall pick for it.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-30-2014, 12:54 PM
|
#64
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Why did we dodge a bullet?
Likely he would have been bought out. Essentially ownership would have bought another pretty decent 1st round pick.
That sounds like exactly the trade I'd like to see made as a Flames fan.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-30-2014, 12:55 PM
|
#65
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone
...we would have just bought him out ourselves and would have got the 12th overall pick for it.
|
no kidding, lol @ calgarypuck sometimes
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2014, 12:56 PM
|
#66
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
|
We would've gained the 12th pick in the draft for cash. Not a bad try.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
|
|
|
|
06-30-2014, 12:56 PM
|
#67
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss
Darren Dreger @DarrenDreger 2m
The Flames were aggressive pre-draft. Offered to take on Mike Ribeiro for 12th pick (Ribeiro wouldn't waive). Ultimately, he was bought out.
|
I would guess it would have been to get the pick and then buy out Ribiero themselves
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2014, 12:57 PM
|
#68
|
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Beside the Dome
|
From Dreger saying "Ribeiro wouldn't waive" I think that implies Arizona has agreed to the terms. Damnit all. 12th overall would have been great.
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2014, 12:57 PM
|
#69
|
|
Franchise Player
|
that would have been the steal of the century...free first round pick
CP "wow that was a close one, got lucky"
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2014, 12:58 PM
|
#70
|
|
Franchise Player
|
To get the 12th and Riberio we probably would have been giving up a good player/prospect or two in order to make the deal. You guys don't think we were just giving up magic beans for him right?
Giving up two more sure things for a player to be bought out and a draft pick doesn't seem like great asset management to me.
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2014, 12:59 PM
|
#71
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Yeah, the Flames almost paid for the 12th overall pick in cash. That would have been brilliant!
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Locke For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-30-2014, 01:00 PM
|
#72
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryKid 
From Sarah McLellan on Twitter https://twitter.com/azc_mclellan
"Maloney: "Mike had some real behavioral issues we felt we could not tolerate going forward.""
Quote:
Originally Posted by zukes
The bolded one gets me. Maloney is not usually a guy that would throw a guy under the bus. He really throws it at Ribeiro here.
Sadly, he'll sign with the Canucks and light the Flames up as usual.
|
Yeah when I read that, I thought this is Maloney telling the other GMs: don't say I didn't warn you
Not only was he buying Ribiero out, but he felt the need to warn the other GMs so that they didn't accidently walk into the same situation.
He might get a 'reclamation project' opportunity at some point, but my guess is he's done and off to Europe for now.
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2014, 01:00 PM
|
#73
|
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drury18
To get the 12th and Riberio we probably would have been giving up a good player/prospect or two in order to make the deal. You guys don't think we were just giving up magic beans for him right?
Giving up two more sure things for a player to be bought out and a draft pick doesn't seem like great asset management to me.
|
I think you are reading too much into it. No mention of "good player/prospect" involved.
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2014, 01:03 PM
|
#74
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drury18
To get the 12th and Riberio we probably would have been giving up a good player/prospect or two in order to make the deal. You guys don't think we were just giving up magic beans for him right?
Giving up two more sure things for a player to be bought out and a draft pick doesn't seem like great asset management to me.
|
Apparently you were privy to details of the tentative deal?
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to EldrickOnIce For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-30-2014, 01:03 PM
|
#75
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lethbridge
|
The Flames were offering up an asset - cash.
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2014, 01:04 PM
|
#76
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drury18
To get the 12th and Riberio we probably would have been giving up a good player/prospect or two in order to make the deal. You guys don't think we were just giving up magic beans for him right?
Giving up two more sure things for a player to be bought out and a draft pick doesn't seem like great asset management to me.
|
I don't think you get what was going on with this apparent proposed trade. Huge jump to assume we would have had to give that up on a player that was just bought out, Coyotes were looking to save cash and cap space, it's all about what they were willing to pay in assets to do it. Flames were in the drivers seat there, too bad it didn't pan out.
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2014, 01:04 PM
|
#77
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: F*** me. We're so f***ing good, you check the f***ing standings? Lets f***ing go! F***ing practice!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug
I think you are reading too much into it. No mention of "good player/prospect" involved.
|
There is no way the Coyotes would have lost their first round pick just to get rid of a problematic player.
__________________
Backlund for Selke 2017 2018
Oilers suck.
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2014, 01:06 PM
|
#78
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CsInMyBlood
There is no way the Coyotes would have lost their first round pick just to get rid of a problematic player.
|
They just ordinary bought him out to get rid of him, taking cap hit to do it, I wouldn't be so sure.
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2014, 01:06 PM
|
#79
|
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
IMO probably the only thing going back to Phoenix was #34. Maybe a B/C prospect too
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2014, 01:07 PM
|
#80
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
It cost the Coyote ownership group $12 million.
I don't have that much money but have a feeling they might be willing to give up the 12th overall pick in exchange for $12 million.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:12 PM.
|
|
