Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-29-2013, 09:08 PM   #41
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AcGold View Post
when you get knocked out you don't have a different reaction, you fall to the ground limp. I'm saying if Mcrgrattan gets suspended for more than a high hit because of additional injury it should be a real injury. Probably hurt like hell getting hit in the face at full speed, but it's part of the rules that an injury can cause longer suspensions so it should be based off more than what appeared to be an embellishment. I don't see how that's so hard to grasp.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zulu29 View Post
When someone gets knocked out, they drop. Simple as that, knees buckle, eyes roll and down you go. Albert's body language IMO does not match that. Was he hurt? Sure, but I think he sold the "knock out" to garner a harsher penalty which he achieved.
I have seen people who were knocked out not just drop right away so I guess I will go back and tell them and their doctors they weren;t knocked out.

I don't know if he was or wasn't and don't really care I am just saying it is not so 100% cut and dry as you are trying to make it out to be.

I also think that McGrattan's suspension should be affected 0 by whether he had a concussion or not.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to moon For This Useful Post:
Old 12-29-2013, 09:08 PM   #42
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
Honestly, I do not even know how that's a penalty. At worst it should've been 2 for charging and even then... He didn't keep striding in, he was gliding in. Shoulder to shoulder contact. Yes the guy's head hit the glass, but that's because he was trying to avoid the hit. That's not McGrattan's fault, Alberts put himself in a bad spot instead of just getting hit.
It looks to me like his hands/forearms hit him in the head which is roughing at the very least.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2013, 09:09 PM   #43
DazzlinDino
Franchise Player
 
DazzlinDino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Grew up in Calgary now living in USA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N-E-B View Post
I was going to say that I really don't think he sold it and when I saw it live I really believed it, but after what some of you have pointed out, I now give Alberts a 10/10 for that one. I do think he was hurt, but if he didn't sell it like that, Gratts probably only gets 2 instead of 5+Game.
I am not going to say "this one", but there have been times where I have wondered if the Canucks had a bet going on to see who could do the best embellishment. In the past the have been some pretty obvious fish flopping embellishments.
DazzlinDino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2013, 09:10 PM   #44
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N-E-B View Post
I was going to say that I really don't think he sold it and when I saw it live I really believed it, but after what some of you have pointed out, I now give Alberts a 10/10 for that one. I do think he was hurt, but if he didn't sell it like that, Gratts probably only gets 2 instead of 5+Game.
Yep, the sell job as a "knockout" is what made it a 5 and a game and not a 2 minute minor. And there's no way he was actually knocked out. That's just simply not what happens when you're knocked out.
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2013, 09:15 PM   #45
AcGold
Self-Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
I have seen people who were knocked out not just drop right away so I guess I will go back and tell them and their doctors they weren;t knocked out.

I don't know if he was or wasn't and don't really care I am just saying it is not so 100% cut and dry as you are trying to make it out to be.

I also think that McGrattan's suspension should be affected 0 by whether he had a concussion or not.
there are flash ko's where someone loses their consciousness temporarily but regain it before they fall but their knees went limp and they lose balance and stumble around then fall

there are ko's where the persons body goes stiff and they aren't completely out, their eyes are open and they are close to thrashing around due to pain but their bodies are in a temporary state of shock

and then there are other times when a person gets hit behind the ear and completely loses their balance and their equilibrium is gone and they stumble around trying to stand.

I've never seen the kind where they get hit, stand up a little and fall down while putting their hands to their face to protect against the fall and then move their hands to their side to look unconscious. I don't even care if Grats can't play, just don't like the idea of Flames players being suspended for injuries that never happened, that's a bad precedent to set.
AcGold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2013, 09:16 PM   #46
JoelOtto29
Backup Goalie
 
JoelOtto29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Detroit
Exp:
Default

i do not like vancouver
JoelOtto29 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JoelOtto29 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-29-2013, 09:28 PM   #47
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AcGold View Post
I don't even care if Grats can't play, just don't like the idea of Flames players being suspended for injuries that never happened, that's a bad precedent to set.
Shouldn't we wait until that actually happens before whining about it.

There is 0 indication that a suspension is even coming let alone because of a concussion/KO.

Has anyone other than CP posters even claimed that he was KO'ed?
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2013, 09:35 PM   #48
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2013, 10:08 PM   #49
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

1. No, Alberts wasn't faking anything.
2. No, that did not warrant a major penalty.

Was just a weird play with an unfortunate result.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-29-2013, 10:08 PM   #50
Southside
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Deep South
Exp:
Default

Slowed it down and watched it a good 5-6 times. No elbow. No further suspension warranted, doesn't mean that he won't get one though.
Southside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2013, 10:15 PM   #51
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
1. No, Alberts wasn't faking anything.
2. No, that did not warrant a major penalty.

Was just a weird play with an unfortunate result.
I thought it was odd that when he fell to the ice he quickly brought both arms to his side. If you ask me Alberts was embelishing the hit to try and draw a major penalty.
__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2013, 10:25 PM   #52
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion View Post
I thought it was odd that when he fell to the ice he quickly brought both arms to his side. If you ask me Alberts was embelishing the hit to try and draw a major penalty.
We all hate the Canucks and we all know their history of embellishment. But the belief that he was acting is negated by the fact that he never returned. Sometimes one simply has to look at it logically.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-29-2013, 10:25 PM   #53
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

I could see this one going either way. I don't think he was intending to injure, but it was a little reckless. It's a difficult one, but if he gets one or two games, I wouldn't complain.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2013, 10:26 PM   #54
Tinordi
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

The issue was the stick in the face not the elbow. If anyone takes a crosscheck to the face like that they're going down.
Tinordi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2013, 10:27 PM   #55
ripTDR
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion View Post
I thought it was odd that when he fell to the ice he quickly brought both arms to his side. If you ask me Alberts was embelishing the hit to try and draw a major penalty.
And I think you are reaching, a lot.

It was a kind of crappy hit. High and what the nhl is trying to get rid of. Deal with it. Guy got five and a game, which is fair and probably all that's gonna happen.
ripTDR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2013, 10:27 PM   #56
Zulu29
Franchise Player
 
Zulu29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kelowna
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
We all hate the Canucks and we all know their history of embellishment. But the belief that he was acting is negated by the fact that he never returned. Sometimes one simply has to look at it logically.
Logically he was hurt on the play, hurt enough to not return. Also logically, he is a Canuck, therefore he embellished by flailing about and then masterfully falling to the ice while protecting his face.
Zulu29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2013, 10:28 PM   #57
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
We all hate the Canucks and we all know their history of embellishment. But the belief that he was acting is negated by the fact that he never returned. Sometimes one simply has to look at it logically.
I'm not saying he wasn't hurt. It just looked rather suspicious that once he fell to the ice he quickly drew his arms to his side.
__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2013, 10:31 PM   #58
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ripTDR View Post
And I think you are reaching, a lot.

It was a kind of crappy hit. High and what the nhl is trying to get rid of. Deal with it. Guy got five and a game, which is fair and probably all that's gonna happen.
A player can get his bell rung and still be conscious enough to move parts of his body. Players embelish all the time, especially the Canucks variety.
__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2013, 10:35 PM   #59
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southside View Post
Slowed it down and watched it a good 5-6 times. No elbow. No further suspension warranted, doesn't mean that he won't get one though.
Exactly this. The NHL is so inconsistent with their suspensions.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2013, 10:36 PM   #60
Southside
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Deep South
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi View Post
The issue was the stick in the face not the elbow. If anyone takes a crosscheck to the face like that they're going down.
Say what? Had another look and haven't a clue what you are talking about.
Southside is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:31 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy