Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-30-2023, 11:07 AM   #441
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
He should be going after Maloney if anything. Bean is a weird target and diminishes his 'insiderrrrrr' status lol.
Maloney answers to Bean AFAIK. Maloney and the Coyotes parted ways because Maloney didn’t want to rush a rebuild despite a bit of success and the ownership wanted to sign pricey free agents and hurry things along.

I think Maloney gets a wildly misplaced amount of criticism, considering his actual history vs his assumed history.
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Old 10-30-2023, 11:08 AM   #442
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Yes. He's saying Burke had balls, and told ownership what needed to be done. And - importantly - they let him do it. And he's saying Bean is a yes man, so that won't happen now.
The approach sure changed under Treliving. And there was a "mutual parting of the ways" with Burke not long after Treliving was hired. I wonder if Burke staying would really have changed anything. He doesn't seem like a patient guy.

One thing about Conroy is that he has the personality to create the kind of culture and tone at the top that would be attractive to players. The team could use that.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Strange Brew For This Useful Post:
Old 10-30-2023, 11:09 AM   #443
Eric Vail
First Line Centre
 
Eric Vail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

An employee who does what he is hired to do isn't a "yes man". He is a good employee.

An employee who defies his boss and does whatever he wants usually gets fired.
Eric Vail is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2023, 11:14 AM   #444
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Bean is the business guy for all of CSEC though. I just don't think he would have much input on the actual hockey side of things.
Bonded is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bonded For This Useful Post:
Old 10-30-2023, 11:14 AM   #445
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
If the reason why we've been spinning our wheels is because managers have been too afraid to tell Edwards... my good god
Not sure it that what it means, if that quote is accurate. If that comment is accurate (maybe it is, maybe it isn't), the take away there is Edwards will listen, and is not the necessarily the controlling puppet master some on here make him out to be.

We black and white things too much. I think for many, it's either Edwards is telling everyone what to do, or he's not involved at all. Like almost every single boss / team member relationship in any business, what actually plays out is somewhere in between would be my guess. Edwards likely has thoughts, ideas and probably questions. Which is completely normal. Does his GM / President of Hockey or Ops or team president view his ideas, questions , thoughts as mandates, or something to be worked with or around? Sounds like Burke could get his ideas through to Edwards while still either deflecting, dismissing or incorporating Edwards' feedback, and still drive the direction on the team he wanted and Edwards trust.

If other GMs / Presidents have failed to do that, it could be more of a reflection on them than just Edwards is controlling - would be my take away.
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2023, 11:17 AM   #446
dustygoon
Franchise Player
 
dustygoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja View Post
Friedman nailed it on 32 Thoughts in a much gentler way that most of us on here have. He said it’s hard to say goodbye to good players, but if it isn’t working then it isn’t working. I’m sure Hanifin, Lindy and Tanev are great guys and they are all good to great players, but it’s time to move on. Ideally with some futures coming back
True...but we all probably are thinking that those are the guys we would actually want to stay. Letting them go because Huberdeau and Kadri suck and are stuck here is so Flames.
__________________
.
"Fun must be always!" - Tomas Hertl
dustygoon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2023, 11:20 AM   #447
GullFoss
#1 Goaltender
 
GullFoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Exp:
Default

John Bean and Don Maloney with regards to their proposed direction for the team:

https://twitter.com/user/status/1714094761923993991
GullFoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GullFoss For This Useful Post:
Old 10-30-2023, 11:22 AM   #448
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
Bean is the business guy for all of CSEC though. I just don't think he would have much input on the actual hockey side of things.
It’s hard to say.

Maloney has a history of trying to manage a team with patience and make the right hockey moves.

Bean, for not having much input, was comfortable taking ownership of where the team was at and how good they were, and the decision to go with the non-rebuild trade option with Tkachuk.

If we’re basing who should be on the hot seat based on how the two guys operate, it’s more Bean than Maloney imo.
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2023, 11:22 AM   #449
camm13
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
I don’t doubt that guy has a connection to the team but I am trying to think of one thing he has got right?
I only started following the account this summer, but if I recall correctly he had toffoli trade news and failed contract talks out days before it was official.
camm13 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to camm13 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-30-2023, 11:22 AM   #450
Toast_Man
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Is he saying Bean is the problem?
I think he's just guessing. Weird to put the blame on Bean when I'm sure Maloney and Conroy are in contact with Edwards.
Toast_Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2023, 11:23 AM   #451
OILFAN #81
Everyone's Favorite Oilfan!
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Jose, California
Exp:
Default

Would be curious to see a poll created if Flames fans were on board with Lindholm/Hanifin signings at this current state.
OILFAN #81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2023, 11:27 AM   #452
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OILFAN #81 View Post
Would be curious to see a poll created if Flames fans were on board with Lindholm/Hanifin signings at this current state.
I don't think you even need a poll. Have to think it would be an overwhelming no
Bonded is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Bonded For This Useful Post:
Old 10-30-2023, 11:28 AM   #453
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OILFAN #81 View Post
Would be curious to see a poll created if Flames fans were on board with Lindholm/Hanifin signings at this current state.
Hanifin - because of his age, for me would 100% depend on a contract vs. trade pieces element.

Lindholm - I'd be on team trade / not sign given the start to the season and his age.
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2023, 11:29 AM   #454
ah123
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Here
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
I don’t doubt that guy has a connection to the team but I am trying to think of one thing he has got right?

If I remember correctly, he got the Conroy hiring (or Huska hiring) right before anyone else
ah123 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ah123 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-30-2023, 11:29 AM   #455
GullFoss
#1 Goaltender
 
GullFoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Exp:
Default

In a lot of ways, this start to the season is really lucky for the franchise. Imagine if they had started the season 10-0 before sucking and by then Lindholm and Hanifin were signed to extensions!

This start leaves very little room for interpretation as to what this team is. They're not a playoff team and the core is post-apex. It's time for a rebuild.

I think by this point, that has dawned on the players and the front office. Better late than never.
GullFoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to GullFoss For This Useful Post:
Old 10-30-2023, 11:38 AM   #456
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GullFoss View Post
In a lot of ways, this start to the season is really lucky for the franchise. Imagine if they had started the season 10-0 before sucking and by then Lindholm and Hanifin were signed to extensions!

This start leaves very little room for interpretation as to what this team is. They're not a playoff team and the core is post-apex. It's time for a rebuild.

I think by this point, that has dawned on the players and the front office. Better late than never.
I bolded the above, not because the conclusion is wrong, but on some level, I think associated cause is wrong, and it matters.

Younger is better, but I don't think the issue with our Core right now is their age. I actually don't think the results would be different if we were fielding this exact same team say 4 years ago.

The problem is the Core - is not a core. It's a group of complimentary pieces, being asked to be primary pieces.

For example - Lindholm IMO, while not ideal, can be your #1 centre on a successful team. But there needs to be another key piece or pieces in the top 6 with him that drive the offence. Same with Huberdeau on the wing. He can be a very good addition to your top 6, but he can't be the driver. Kadri can be a very good #2 or 3 centre. But he can't be one of your top 4 players.

This seems to be the issue with the team more so than their age IMO.
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Cleveland Steam Whistle For This Useful Post:
Old 10-30-2023, 11:45 AM   #457
GullFoss
#1 Goaltender
 
GullFoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Steam Whistle View Post
I bolded the above, not because the conclusion is wrong, but on some level, I think associated cause is wrong, and it matters.

Younger is better, but I don't think the issue with our Core right now is their age. I actually don't think the results would be different if we were fielding this exact same team say 4 years ago.

The problem is the Core - is not a core. It's a group of complimentary pieces, being asked to be primary pieces.

For example - Lindholm IMO, while not ideal, can be your #1 centre on a successful team. But there needs to be another key piece or pieces in the top 6 with him that drive the offence. Same with Huberdeau on the wing. He can be a very good addition to your top 6, but he can't be the driver. Kadri can be a very good #2 or 3 centre. But he can't be one of your top 4 players.

This seems to be the issue with the team more so than their age IMO.
I think your point about the core not being good enough is complementary to my point.

My point was more that with a team pre-apex you can add pieces or stand still on the roster and have reasons to believe next year will be better than this one. When your roster is post-apex, you're swimming against the tide from a roster construction standpoint. It's really hard to get a post-apex non-playoff team back to the playoffs and even harder to get them back to contention.

On a side note, I still can't figure out who was carrying Huby's line in Florida the year he got 115 points. He played with two middle six player, neither of which seemingly drove play. How did he get 115 points? I think Huby remains the biggest reason to be hopeful.
GullFoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GullFoss For This Useful Post:
Old 10-30-2023, 12:09 PM   #458
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GullFoss View Post
On a side note, I still can't figure out who was carrying Huby's line in Florida the year he got 115 points. He played with two middle six player, neither of which seemingly drove play. How did he get 115 points? I think Huby remains the biggest reason to be hopeful.
Yeah, I actually took a look to see if his assists were mostly secondary but they weren't. He was making plays happen
Bonded is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2023, 12:16 PM   #459
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Because Florida played the game really fast it was get the puck and go.

The same thing in Colorado.

These guys are struggling because we want to play more controlled cori stats.

You can still get your corsi stats by playing a rush game.

We lack the team speed to play that way it seems.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Paulie Walnuts For This Useful Post:
Old 10-30-2023, 12:27 PM   #460
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Maloney answers to Bean AFAIK. Maloney and the Coyotes parted ways because Maloney didn’t want to rush a rebuild despite a bit of success and the ownership wanted to sign pricey free agents and hurry things along.

I think Maloney gets a wildly misplaced amount of criticism, considering his actual history vs his assumed history.
Maloney was the GM of the Coyotes for 9 years so yeah, he wasn't in a rush. He didn't exactly leave behind a juggernaut.

And his three years as GM of the islanders was rather abysmal.

I really don't believe his role with the club is all that meaningful but there is no evidence that he is all that great at building a contender. He strikes me as a good guy that has been around the game a long time and obviously has learned a thing or two.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:59 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy