11-29-2015, 08:56 AM
|
#3561
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: May 2009
Exp:  
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak
Hamonic wanting to be in Western Canada is the whole reason for the trade to happen and that's something Columbus can't offer.
|
Wanting and getting are two different things.
Hamonic without a no trade clause can want all day. If Columbus offers the best deal, Snow takes it.
|
|
|
11-29-2015, 08:58 AM
|
#3562
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
And then hamonic refuses to go or retires and the bj's lose everything. In this situation, hamonic will end up in western Canada.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
11-29-2015, 09:02 AM
|
#3563
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose
Yeah, hamonic could be the big shakeup the team needs. And its young players coming back which fits the rebuild template.
It might require the Flames 1st pick in 2016. Do you risk it? What if they took a bad contract back?
Id say yes, unless the Flames win the lottery so its a calculated risk.
|
No chance. thats a top 5 pick. Not risking it for Hamonic.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Da_Chief For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-29-2015, 09:02 AM
|
#3564
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina
Sounds like you haven't heard of him. He's far better than a mediocre stay at home defenceman.
|
Mediocre was the wrong word, but on most teams he's just a 4-5 d-man. Solid defensively but what's his upside for giving up anything substantial? That's where I have the problem with his name being brought up. Lets face it, he's a young Barrett Jackman who can skate better. Nice to have, but not at the cost of the names being thrown out. Again, guys like him get a lovefest every season, but 3 years from now, you look back and say "why"?
|
|
|
11-29-2015, 09:05 AM
|
#3565
|
Franchise Player
|
I bet Hamonic ends up in Winnipeg and nowhere else.
Really what is the point in moving closer to Winnipeg when he would still have to fly home from Edmonton/Calgary every time he wants to go back to the farm?
When you have NHL money you could fly home pretty frequently from anywhere if you really desire it. Does it really make a giant difference, which other NHL city you are in?
Versus playing in Winnipeg where he could commute to the rink from the family farm everyday. I think that must be what he really wants.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Oil Stain For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-29-2015, 09:13 AM
|
#3566
|
I believe in the Pony Power
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fleury
Mediocre was the wrong word, but on most teams he's just a 4-5 d-man. Solid defensively but what's his upside for giving up anything substantial? That's where I have the problem with his name being brought up. Lets face it, he's a young Barrett Jackman who can skate better. Nice to have, but not at the cost of the names being thrown out. Again, guys like him get a lovefest every season, but 3 years from now, you look back and say "why"?
|
If you are saying he's a 4/5 you aren't familiar with him
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JiriHrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-29-2015, 09:24 AM
|
#3567
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: May 2009
Exp:  
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969
And then hamonic refuses to go or retires and the bj's lose everything. In this situation, hamonic will end up in western Canada.
|
Hamonic at 25 is not retiring. He has spent most of his life working for and dreaming of playing in the NHL.
He is not giving that up to go play in the local men's league against the x-ray tech playing goalie and the waiter playing first line center
Notice how many teams have tried jumping in on the Hamonic trade?
Strange that none of the GMs of those teams are worried about Hamonic retiring.
As a matter of fact,more comments are coming out from NHL sources, that the isles should tell Hamonic no, that they won't trade him.
|
|
|
11-29-2015, 09:24 AM
|
#3568
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina
If you are saying he's a 4/5 you aren't familiar with him
|
Or is it possible you over-rate him? I may be in the minority's but I don't see anything spectacular about him and would see him playing on the 2nd pair on a good team. On our defense he's on the 2nd pair and in the 4 slot. I see him as an outstanding complimentary player to what we have, but he's still in the 4 slot on this team. What does he do that makes him any more than that?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-29-2015, 09:26 AM
|
#3569
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: May 2009
Exp:  
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fleury
Mediocre was the wrong word, but on most teams he's just a 4-5 d-man. Solid defensively but what's his upside for giving up anything substantial? That's where I have the problem with his name being brought up. Lets face it, he's a young Barrett Jackman who can skate better. Nice to have, but not at the cost of the names being thrown out. Again, guys like him get a lovefest every season, but 3 years from now, you look back and say "why"?
|
Why not simply say you have not seen much of him and cannot give an accurate scouting report?
|
|
|
11-29-2015, 09:29 AM
|
#3570
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Da_Chief
No chance. thats a top 5 pick. Not risking it for Hamonic.
|
Wideman, Hudler and 2016 1st for Hamonic and Strome?
You get a young defensemen and a recent 5th overall pick. When I look at that I actually think Flames would have to add.
|
|
|
11-29-2015, 09:30 AM
|
#3571
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
Or is it possible you over-rate him? I may be in the minority's but I don't see anything spectacular about him and would see him playing on the 2nd pair on a good team. On our defense he's on the 2nd pair and in the 4 slot. I see him as an outstanding complimentary player to what we have, but he's still in the 4 slot on this team. What does he do that makes him any more than that?
|
I see him as a #2/3 D man. Thats a big difference from a 4/5 Dman like " Fleury " suggested. He plays a physical game , can skate, can move the puck, and is great in his own zone.
If he was on the flames right now he would probably take Gio's spot while Gio finds his game. In a couple of years Gio will probably be down to a 2nd pairing guy.
Hamonic would be great to pair with Hamilton. The only problem seems to be the price that Snow wants for him. He is treating Hamonic like a true #1.
|
|
|
11-29-2015, 09:34 AM
|
#3572
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
If you haven't heard of Hamonic then I would suggest that it looks worse on you than on Hamonic.
Nobody's saying he's a world beater but think back to those heady days of how we valued Regehr in his prime. Harmonic is similar, not as big or as physical but more offensive and dynamic.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Tinordi For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-29-2015, 09:37 AM
|
#3573
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: ...the bench
|
Our 1st isn't moving this year. It's going to be a premium pick.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Benched For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-29-2015, 09:38 AM
|
#3574
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oil Stain
I bet Hamonic ends up in Winnipeg and nowhere else.
Really what is the point in moving closer to Winnipeg when he would still have to fly home from Edmonton/Calgary every time he wants to go back to the farm?
When you have NHL money you could fly home pretty frequently from anywhere if you really desire it. Does it really make a giant difference, which other NHL city you are in?
Versus playing in Winnipeg where he could commute to the rink from the family farm everyday. I think that must be what he really wants.
|
With Calgary/Edmonton the difference is 10 direct flights to Winnipeg/day.
From the majority of NHL cities that number is 0
|
|
|
11-29-2015, 09:45 AM
|
#3575
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benched
Our 1st isn't moving this year. It's going to be a premium pick.
|
Yeah, it's probably better to load up on picks rather than giving them away. It does look like there some good NHL ready kids likely to be drafted in the first 5.
|
|
|
11-29-2015, 10:01 AM
|
#3576
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hunter7
You realize Milbury is no longer the isles GM?
Snow would not touch that deal. Gio is on the wrong side of 30, battling injuries and locked into a very big contract. Tavares is due his new contract in 2016.
And the isles center depth is :Tavares, Frans Nielsen, Strome, Grabovski, Cizikas, Brock Nekson, Barzal. They would not have interest in Backlund either.
|
Snow has less leverage if he is going to respect Hamonic's wishes. The key part of that package for me would be a willingness to move Gio. Hell I would add Hudler to that package to get it done.
Snow is the guy who moved a 1st, 2nd and Matt Moulsen for Vanek and then moved Vanek and a 5th for the equivalent of 2 2nd's later that season. It is not like you are trading with Sam Pollack here
|
|
|
11-29-2015, 10:02 AM
|
#3577
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: May 2009
Exp:  
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose
Wideman, Hudler and 2016 1st for Hamonic and Strome?
You get a young defensemen and a recent 5th overall pick. When I look at that I actually think Flames would have to add.
|
Isles would view Wideman as a cap dump.
They don't want players about to become ufas in exchange for their youngsters.
And I think it was the Hockey News that said Snow has gotten trade calls about Strome and has no interest in trading the 22 yr old,
Isles are not looking for picks, so while that 1st will land a very good prospect,it won't land either Hamonic or Strome who are young nhlers.
|
|
|
11-29-2015, 10:05 AM
|
#3578
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Strome right now will replace one of the isles pending ufas Okposo or Nielsen. They are unlikely to trade him.
|
|
|
11-29-2015, 10:08 AM
|
#3579
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey
Snow has less leverage if he is going to respect Hamonic's wishes. The key part of that package for me would be a willingness to move Gio. Hell I would add Hudler to that package to get it done.
Snow is the guy who moved a 1st, 2nd and Matt Moulsen for Vanek and then moved Vanek and a 5th for the equivalent of 2 2nd's later that season. It is not like you are trading with Sam Pollack here
|
I'm not saying Snow is Gm of the year, but he is not as bad as people think. For starters he has to deal with Wang ,who i think is the Willy Wonka of NHL owners. Snow has built up a very respectable team. He has traded for players in the past that didn't want to go their at first , only to have them end up signing extensions with the team.
He did pay to much for Vanek, but Snow clearly thought Vanek would put them over the hump. Can't blame Snow for what he got in return for Vanek later that year. That deadline day, price wise, was completley different than prices had been in the past and the following year. Wasn't Cammi only worth a 4th round pick that year if Burke decided to trade him?
|
|
|
11-29-2015, 10:12 AM
|
#3580
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: May 2009
Exp:  
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey
Snow has less leverage if he is going to respect Hamonic's wishes. The key part of that package for me would be a willingness to move Gio. Hell I would add Hudler to that package to get it done.
Snow is the guy who moved a 1st, 2nd and Matt Moulsen for Vanek and then moved Vanek and a 5th for the equivalent of 2 2nd's later that season. It is not like you are trading with Sam Pollack here
|
The media says Snow has talked to about 20 teams regarding a Hamonic trade.
How is that respecting Hamonic's wish to play for 1 of 3 teams?
Snow traded for Vanek when Moulson priced himself off the roster and before Okposo's offensive breakout. Isles thought their $7m per , longterm contract was all they needed to get Vanek to sign. Instead only wanted to play at home in Minn.
Vanek played like a dog and dragged down his trade value. With the trade deadline quickly approaching, Snow had to take Montreal's lowball offer.
Snow is the same GM who got Boychuk for two 2nd rounders+ a conditional 3rd that he did not have to give up.
He got Leddy for a good prospect and sweeteners.
He turned a struggling Reinhart into the Barzal and Beauvillier at last summer's draft.
I have no doubt that Snow will get very good value for Hamonic, even if that means Hamonic ends up somewhere outside Western Canada.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Hunter7 For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:55 AM.
|
|