[OOT] March 4 with five games.

[topfiverecords]

Originally Posted by dino7c

lol all day, I posted who won...in the OOT
like everyone else does

Ya, sure you entered the thread with the intention to post that Vegas won? No, you had to point it out in response to MathGod’s post. Totally different. Odd you
haven’t posted any of the other winners today since you were just casually posting teams that won in an OOT.

Yes all day. 28 posts in the Weegar thread! All of em obviousities. Chronic.

[dino7c]

Originally Posted by Mathgod

Do you know what "on track" means?

do you? besides you said "about to pass" which is even more wrong

On track would suggest points pace, which favours...you guessed it, the Knights win or lose tonight

Don't worry Top5 will give you a thank because he hates me so much he will thank wrong information rather than agree with me lol

[Jay Random]

Originally Posted by Mathgod

Yes they were on track to pass Vegas if the Wings had hung on tonight. Doesn't matter if you admit it or not.

If the Wings had beaten the Knights in regulation, Vegas would have 70 points in 62 games now. The Oilers have 68 points in 62 games. There was no possible outcome of tonight's games that would put the Oilers ahead of Vegas.

As it is, Vegas now has 72 points. Vegas is four times as far ahead of Edmonton as Edmonton is ahead of Seattle – and Seattle still holds a game in hand.

I should have thought a ‘mathgod’ could handle that kind of simple arithmetic.

[dino7c]

Originally Posted by topfiverecords

Ya, sure you entered the thread with the intention to post that Vegas won? No, you had to point it out in response to MathGod’s post. Totally different. Odd you
haven’t posted any of the other winners today since you were just casually posting teams that won in an OOT.

Yes all day. 28 posts in the Weegar thread! All of em obviousities. Chronic.

lol I posted that the Blues won, check the previous page

[Jay Random]

Originally Posted by Mathgod

Do you know what "on track" means?

In this particular case, it means you are extrapolating a trend from a single data point. Which, in mathematics, is an absolute no-no.

[Mathgod]

jesus h ####ing christ... I said "ABOUT TO PASS" not "GONNA PASS TONIGHT"

you know what ABOUT TO PASS means? IN the context of a ####ing season?

Means it could happen SOMETIME SOON

WHich means ANY NIGHT IN THE NEAR FUTURE, NOT TONIGHT

jesus h ####ing christ sometimes this is like talking to 5 year olds

what a silly thread, good night

[topfiverecords]

Originally Posted by dino7c

do you? besides you said "about to pass" which is even more wrong

On track would suggest points pace, which favours...you guessed it, the Knights win or lose tonight

Don't worry Top5 will give you a thank because he hates me so much he will thank wrong information rather than agree with me lol

It would take a concussion, dementia, dehydration and a week without food in the desert to enter into a stratosphere where agreeing with you had a 0.0000000000000000000000001% chance of happening.

I’m delighted that every time you see my thanks to someone else’s posts you feel triggered.

[dino7c]

Originally Posted by Mathgod

jesus h ####ing christ... I said "ABOUT TO PASS" not "GONNA PASS TONIGHT"

you know what ABOUT TO PASS means? IN the context of a ####ing season?

Means it could happen SOMETIME SOON

WHich means ANY NIGHT IN THE NEAR FUTURE, NOT TONIGHT

jesus h ####ing christ sometimes this is like talking to 5 year olds

what a silly thread, good night

You are the 5 year old that won't admit you called a game before it ended and were wrong about them being on track because you were being dramatic about the Oilers.

[dino7c]

Originally Posted by topfiverecords

It would take a concussion, dementia, dehydration and a week without food in the desert to enter into a stratosphere where agreeing with you had a 0.0000000000000000000000001% chance of happening.

I’m delighted that every time you see my thanks to someone else’s posts you feel triggered.

You are the one thanking erroneous information and being wrong about most things on CP in general so its okay with me.

[topfiverecords]

Originally Posted by dino7c

You are the 5 year old that won't admit you called a game before it ended and were wrong about them being on track because you were being dramatic about the Oilers.

Who the hell cares. Millions of people before and millions after will call a game before it ended. In fact millions per day put money on a call (you do for sure) before the game has even started!! How dramatic!

[topfiverecords]

Originally Posted by dino7c

You are the one thanking erroneous information and being wrong about most things on CP in general so its okay with me.

Hmmm, most things eh. Let’s hear em.

[dino7c]

Originally Posted by topfiverecords

Who the hell cares. Millions of people before and millions after will call a game before it ended. In fact millions per day put money on a call (you do for sure) before the game has even started!! How dramatic!

but they often admit they were wrong when the math can not be disputed...he had the snarky "sherlock" comment not me

[dino7c]

Originally Posted by topfiverecords

Hmmm, most things eh. Let’s hear em.

Flames aren't rebuilding? pretty sure you voted no
Your vote in the first overall pick thread is also a laugher
Rasmus trade was a loss?

all terrible takes

[Jay Random]

Originally Posted by Mathgod

jesus h ####ing christ... I said "ABOUT TO PASS" not "GONNA PASS TONIGHT"

you know what ABOUT TO PASS means? IN the context of a ####ing season?

Means it could happen SOMETIME SOON

WHich means ANY NIGHT IN THE NEAR FUTURE, NOT TONIGHT

jesus h ####ing christ sometimes this is like talking to 5 year olds

what a silly thread, good night

So in other words, you are plotting a trend based on one data point – just as I said. Which is something you can never do in mathematics.

Then, to make it even sillier, you based it on a hypothetical data point – Vegas losing tonight – which never even happened. That's like drawing your own imaginary point on the graph just so you can make the curve go where you want.

[dino7c]

In other words he was worried about it happening, which is fine...but don't get into an argument on the Math when its wrong lol. Oilers haven't gained ####...well one point in the last 10 while Vegas has been terrible.

[topfiverecords]

Originally Posted by dino7c

Flames aren't rebuilding? pretty sure you voted no
Your vote in the first overall pick thread is also a laugher

I’m already aware from all of our previous interactions that there’s zero point in responding with background on those two examples because you’ve never proven you’ve executed reading comprehension and it’s always been a massive waste of time so I’ll just have a huge laugh at the fact that you’ve missed the obvious subtext and points that were made in those. Way too high level for you at the second step of the ladder.

[Jay Random]

Originally Posted by topfiverecords

I’m already aware from all of our previous interactions that there’s zero point in responding with background on those two examples because you’ve never proven you’ve executed reading comprehension and it’s always been a massive waste of time so I’ll just have a huge laugh at the fact that you’ve missed the obvious subtext and points that were made in those. Way too high level for you at the second step of the ladder.

‘Obvious subtext’, in this case, would appear to mean ‘things I didn't say but expect you to assume that I said in order to make me look better’.

[dino7c]

Originally Posted by topfiverecords

I’m already aware from all of our previous interactions that there’s zero point in responding with background on those two examples because you’ve never proven you’ve executed reading comprehension and it’s always been a massive waste of time so I’ll just have a huge laugh at the fact that you’ve missed the obvious subtext and points that were made in those. Way too high level for you at the second step of the ladder.

Ethan Belchetz first overall derp
Flames not rebuilding
Rasmus trade a loss
a team with 68 points in 62 games is on track to pass a team with 72 points in 62 games (you thanked it)

nice picks smartest guy in the room but as I said agreeing with you is probably the wrong way to go lol

[topfiverecords]

Originally Posted by Jay Random

‘Obvious subtext’, in this case, would appear to mean ‘things I didn't say but expect you to assume that I said in order to make me look better’.

If you don’t get it, why would I care? There’s 10,000 other posts everyone else scrolls past to read. I’m not dumbing everything down for the kindergarteners.

[topfiverecords]

Originally Posted by dino7c

Ethan Belchetz first overall derp
Flames not rebuilding
Rasmus trade a loss
a team with 68 points in 62 games is on track to pass a team with 72 points in 62 games (you thanked it)

nice picks smartest guy in the room but as I said agreeing with you is probably the wrong way to go lol

You’re reaching HFOil tier poster with this obliviousness.