Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-17-2026, 08:18 PM   #24121
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BaconGuy View Post
Is CC allowed to put a “In-season signing condition” in each of these packages to prevent teams from trading as a rental with intents to sign at a later point
Nope. No conditions related to re-signing can be placed on a trade under the new CBA.

Nice idea, it's just against the rules.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.

‘You see in Calgary, [Ryan] Huska is no joke. It’s good. He’s really set on a specific model defensively. If you can be reliable, you have the freedom to play offence.’
—Ethan Wyttenbach
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 08:19 PM   #24122
BaconGuy
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
Nope. No conditions related to re-signing can be placed on a trade under the new CBA.

Nice idea, it's just against the rules.
Had a feeling something like that was in place. Thx
BaconGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 08:24 PM   #24123
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
The positive takeaway with Boston is that there appears to be good faith negotiation between the two parties on extension.

If Boston thought Andersson's demands were too much or if Andersson didn't want to consider Boston's offer, the Flames would probably moved on to another team.
It’s also a way for Conroy to put a bit of pressure on the Andersson camp. Let Boston sell him on the offer and the situation.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 08:35 PM   #24124
HockeyKhan
Crash and Bang Winger
 
HockeyKhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: next door to Borat
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
It’s also a way for Conroy to put a bit of pressure on the Andersson camp. Let Boston sell him on the offer and the situation.
Having Lindholm there hopefully helps sell Boston to him.
__________________
Sure, Edmonton sucks, but I don't want Kid Hee-haw and his heiress from la-di-da St. Louis dissing it - that's OUR dumb kid brother, not thiers. -Courtesy of Jammies
HockeyKhan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to HockeyKhan For This Useful Post:
Old 01-17-2026, 08:38 PM   #24125
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandman View Post
Lol, watch Lohrei get hurt…
Doubt it would sink the deal, even if he did. He's signed through next season. Not a big deal to the Flames if he were set to miss a month
Enoch Root is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 08:58 PM   #24126
CFO
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Exp:
Default

Longer this goes. Most likely worse a deal becomes
CFO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 08:59 PM   #24127
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CFO View Post
Longer this goes. Most likely worse a deal becomes
How so????

The longer this goes, the more likely it’s a great deal. There.
Scroopy Noopers is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Scroopy Noopers For This Useful Post:
Old 01-17-2026, 09:01 PM   #24128
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CFO View Post
Longer this goes. Most likely worse a deal becomes
English grammar from Yoda did you learn?
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.

‘You see in Calgary, [Ryan] Huska is no joke. It’s good. He’s really set on a specific model defensively. If you can be reliable, you have the freedom to play offence.’
—Ethan Wyttenbach
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
Old 01-17-2026, 09:02 PM   #24129
BigThief
First Line Centre
 
BigThief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CFO View Post
Longer this goes. Most likely worse a deal becomes
What if it goes on so long that the timeline inverts and becomes better the longer it goes?
BigThief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 09:04 PM   #24130
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sofa GM View Post
There are going to be some sad people here I believe.
I'm fine with the rumored Lohrei / 1st / Poitras. It still wouldn't hurt to ask for a 1st instead of Poitras and Lohrei. Especially with how injury prone H. Lindholm is. For a team trying to make the playoffs, it would be better for Boston to add without much subtraction. I get most are saying Lohrei is a bottom pairing D with PP ice time, however, he is still producing with that limited ice time. There's value in that.

Plus, a D lineup of:

H. Lindholm - McAvoy
Zadorov - Andersson
Lohrei - Jokiharju

Looks pretty good.
ForeverFlameFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 09:05 PM   #24131
Tbull8
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
I'm fine with the rumored Lohrei / 1st / Poitras. It still wouldn't hurt to ask for a 1st instead of Poitras and Lohrei. Especially with how injury prone H. Lindholm is. For a team trying to make the playoffs, it would be better for Boston to add without much subtraction. I get most are saying Lohrei is a bottom pairing D with PP ice time, however, he is still producing with that limited ice time. There's value in that.

Plus, a D lineup of:

H. Lindholm - McAvoy
Zadorov - Andersson
Lohrei - Jokiharju

Looks pretty good.
Flames want 2 1sts or equivalent. Boston has 2 1sts. Seems pretty simple to me
Tbull8 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tbull8 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-17-2026, 09:06 PM   #24132
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbull8 View Post
Flames want 2 1sts or equivalent. Boston has 2 1sts. Seems pretty simple to me
Agreed. Give me the lesser of BOS/TOR 2026 and BOS/FLA in 2027. Easy.
ForeverFlameFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 09:13 PM   #24133
CFO
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigThief View Post
What if it goes on so long that the timeline inverts and becomes better the longer it goes?

At some point teams will move on to plan B's.
CFO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 09:19 PM   #24134
Funkhouser
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Funkhouser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MTL
Exp:
Default

I wonder if all the Lohrei doubters have actually watched him?
I remember when he first broke into the league, seeing him play against Calgary, he was super impressive. His skill-set and size are unique.

He was drafted as a 19 year old and has been a slow burn...I believe he is a late bloomer with less miles on his odometer than most. Similar to a Giordano or a Weegar - the best is yet to come with him.

I remember wanting the Flames to trade for him two years ago. I still want the Flames to trade for him. He is a middle-pairing D who could thrive in the right environment. Plus, it gives Wolf a red-headed friend so they won't feel too left out.

Make it happen Craig!
Funkhouser is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Funkhouser For This Useful Post:
Old 01-17-2026, 09:24 PM   #24135
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
I'm fine with the rumored Lohrei / 1st / Poitras. It still wouldn't hurt to ask for a 1st instead of Poitras and Lohrei.
Boston has just enough cap space now ($1.75 million prorated) to fit in Andersson's salary if they trade back Lohrei. If they keep Lohrei, they can't quite add Andersson even with maximum retention. From their point of view, he would be pretty much a cap dump on the deal; from Conroy's, a reclamation project that might be turned into something useful later on.

Conroy's stated price was two 1sts or the equivalent. Poitras has developed, so far, better than the average 2nd-round pick, and he plays a valued position, so he's not far off of ‘the equivalent’, and of course the 1st would be a 1st. Which pretty much means that any value he can extract from Lohrei is playing with house money.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.

‘You see in Calgary, [Ryan] Huska is no joke. It’s good. He’s really set on a specific model defensively. If you can be reliable, you have the freedom to play offence.’
—Ethan Wyttenbach

Last edited by Jay Random; 01-17-2026 at 09:28 PM.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 09:24 PM   #24136
Psytic
First Line Centre
 
Psytic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Lohrei, TOs 1st and Swap Lysell over Poitras and it looks good.
Psytic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 09:24 PM   #24137
Infinit47
#1 Goaltender
 
Infinit47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Funkhouser View Post
I wonder if all the Lohrei doubters have actually watched him?
I remember when he first broke into the league, seeing him play against Calgary, he was super impressive. His skill-set and size are unique.

He was drafted as a 19 year old and has been a slow burn...I believe he is a late bloomer with less miles on his odometer than most. Similar to a Giordano or a Weegar - the best is yet to come with him.

I remember wanting the Flames to trade for him two years ago. I still want the Flames to trade for him. He is a middle-pairing D who could thrive in the right environment. Plus, it gives Wolf a red-headed friend so they won't feel too left out.

Make it happen Craig!
He has two goals in tonight's game. Guess Boston will keep him now.
Infinit47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 09:25 PM   #24138
Baaarrden
Scoring Winger
 
Baaarrden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Red Mile
Exp:
Default

Lohrei with 2g tonight against Chicago
Baaarrden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 09:28 PM   #24139
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by baaarrden View Post
lohrei with 2g tonight against chicago
https://twitter.com/user/status/2012716867232665699
https://twitter.com/user/status/2012727400103039148
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
Old 01-17-2026, 09:29 PM   #24140
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Fine, keep Lohrei and offer a better prospect.

Letourneau will do.

Last edited by TrentCrimmIndependent; 01-17-2026 at 09:33 PM.
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TrentCrimmIndependent For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:09 PM.

Calgary Flames
2025-26






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy