2025/2026 Season Trade Rumours and Speculation Thread

[Erick Estrada]

I would take the Knights 2027 1st round pick without conditions. I could see them declining year over year.

[Sandman]

Originally Posted by jg13

Also think the Finnie kid would be a great addition for the Flames from Detroit

He would be a sneaky good pick up, and he’s only 20.

[CalgaryFan1988]

I knew the Jets were playing bad, but 0 wins in their last 10 is something special.

[Roko]

Today would be a great day for a Rasmus trade.
Then we can get Zayne into the game.

[Royle9]

Jets are in full tank mode, problem is they've traded away so many assets chasing their hot seasons the last few years they're in rough shape.

I did receive a quick message this morning of a cooking emoji.
I don't want to take people away from work spamming f5 etc, but I believe something is definitely brewing here on the Flames front, the trade might not be imminent but looks to be serious offers starting to come through.

[Jiggy]

Originally Posted by Royle9

Jets are in full tank mode, problem is they've traded away so many assets chasing their hot seasons the last few years they're in rough shape.

I did receive a quick message this morning of a cooking emoji.
I don't want to take people away from work spamming f5 etc, but I believe something is definitely brewing here on the Flames front, the trade might not be imminent but looks to be serious offers starting to come through.

I love a good cooking emoji!

[CgyFlamesftw]

Originally Posted by Royle9

Jets are in full tank mode, problem is they've traded away so many assets chasing their hot seasons the last few years they're in rough shape.

I did receive a quick message this morning of a cooking emoji.
I don't want to take people away from work spamming f5 etc, but I believe something is definitely brewing here on the Flames front, the trade might not be imminent but looks to be serious offers starting to come through.

Need something happen quick. Can tell the team is off and I’m sure all these trade rumours are the reason why. That being said these losses are a blessing for team tank.

[Badgers Nose]

I know all eyes are on Rasmus, but I really hope that some roster move out of left field catches us by surprise this week too. We have so many wingers.

There’s also a few guys on the team that could benefit from a change of scenery even if we just get some other team’s problem child back if it’s the right problem child it would be worth it.

[getbak]

I'm going to make a wild-ass guess that Andersson is traded sometime after the game in Pittsburgh on Saturday afternoon and the game in Columbus on Tuesday.

[dustyanddaflames]

Originally Posted by Royle9

Jets are in full tank mode, problem is they've traded away so many assets chasing their hot seasons the last few years they're in rough shape.

I did receive a quick message this morning of a cooking emoji.
I don't want to take people away from work spamming f5 etc, but I believe something is definitely brewing here on the Flames front, the trade might not be imminent but looks to be serious offers starting to come through.

It is fine. Our keyboards were built for moments like these.

[sureLoss]

Chris Johnston has Andersson and Coleman #3 and #4 respectively on his trade board with Kadri #19.

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/694...shared_article

[Tbull8]

Mangiapane being #2 is hilarious. That’s like saying Beecher is a top trade chip

[Badgers Nose]

Chris Johnston has a brain abscess. He really should get that looked at.

[mdubz]

Pretty sure it's based on likelihood of being traded, not their value.

[Geeoff]

Seems like it's gonna be a ####ty deadline. But actually, I dunno there's lots of teams that could suddenly decide to tank. No one's really going for it yet and it could be an aggressive arms race to the bottom at the deadline. You could be a pretty good team right now with some injuries or something and end up with McKenna

[Toonage]

Was thinking Ras looked pretty disengaged last night, but then the whole team followed suit so I guess thats nothing.

[Jiri Hrdina]

Originally Posted by mdubz

Pretty sure it's based on likelihood of being traded, not their value.

It's described as this:

As always, players are listed by how closely they demand watching, based on their potential impact and the current amount of buzz around them.

Note: Net Ratings and market values are via Dom Luszczyszyn’s model and are projected for the full season based on statistics through Jan. 6. Goals saved above expected (GSAx) are via Evolving-Hockey, also through Jan. 6. Contract info is via PuckPedia.

[Sandman]

Originally Posted by Royle9

Jets are in full tank mode, problem is they've traded away so many assets chasing their hot seasons the last few years they're in rough shape.

I did receive a quick message this morning of a cooking emoji.
I don't want to take people away from work spamming f5 etc, but I believe something is definitely brewing here on the Flames front, the trade might not be imminent but looks to be serious offers starting to come through.

If you’re saying that the Jets are in full tank mode, does that mean they will be selling off vets? If so, that floods the market and makes it harder for us to get value for our assets…

[Bingo]

Originally Posted by Sandman

If you’re saying that the Jets are in full tank mode, does that mean they will be selling off vets? If so, that floods the market and makes it harder for us to get value for our assets…

Not really ...

All their vets are locked up long term (some forever).

[Two Fivenagame]

I really see the Jets as that team who sells some players and then starts climbing the standings. I think Nashville did that a few seasons ago.