Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-05-2025, 09:39 AM   #61
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Yen Man View Post
Some people need to relax a little. Flames are still, by points %, the worst team in the league, even after their current hot streak. They've luckily banked a lot of losses earlier in the season to shield themselves from finishing in the mushy middle.

I expect as other teams start ramping up the second 20 game set, we'll see Flames get those coveted losses. They had to play above their heads just to be barely over .500 over the last stretch of games.
Is this a hot streak or is this the team playing up to their level? If I look at the season to date, the first 15 games or so seems like the anomaly. Since then they have played similarly to last year.

Trading Rasmus at the deadline should have a negative effect. But I looked at the record at end of 2024 and they were .500 in their last ten games after trading half the team. In small samples, anything can happen especially with an injection of youth.

'm not ready to predict anything but this looks like a team working hard and getting solid goaltending. Some of the big underperformers have been picking it up lately.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2025, 09:51 AM   #62
NewFan
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by topfiverecords View Post
Only 5 points out of a playoff spot!
Yeah, Looks like we are back in our regular path.
NewFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2025, 09:56 AM   #63
CroFlames
Franchise Player
 
CroFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze2 View Post
I thought we hated Andersson? Now he's back? I can't keep track. Now I need to get a backpack and a six pack. - Eminem
Never hated Andersson, but the timing is such that he needs to be traded and not extended.

He started out slow this year so maybe some posters gave the impression that he sucks, but he'll fetch a good return.

Alas, the return would have been better if they traded him last year.
CroFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2025, 09:58 AM   #64
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Alas, the return would have been better if they traded him last year.
How do we know this? There are so many factors that weigh into a trade return including how the player is performing, term remaining and the available buyers.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 12-05-2025, 10:45 AM   #65
The Yen Man
Franchise Player
 
The Yen Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
Is this a hot streak or is this the team playing up to their level? If I look at the season to date, the first 15 games or so seems like the anomaly. Since then they have played similarly to last year.

Trading Rasmus at the deadline should have a negative effect. But I looked at the record at end of 2024 and they were .500 in their last ten games after trading half the team. In small samples, anything can happen especially with an injection of youth.

'm not ready to predict anything but this looks like a team working hard and getting solid goaltending. Some of the big underperformers have been picking it up lately.
I agree that we never know what to expect. But I am still of the gut feeling when all's said and done, Flames will still be drafting top 5 this season. Maybe that's wishful thinking on my part, but I don't feel any panic yet until they go on a 10 game heater lol.

At the end of the day, I'm with you. I do now subconsciously cheer for losses, even though before I was on the anti tank side. Maybe it's the Maloney thing that rubbed me the wrong way. I just really want the team performance to spell out to upper management that this team is clearly not good enough, and continuing to spin their wheels is the worst way to run this franchise. We have an opportunity to draft a high end guy, and we refuse to do so?
The Yen Man is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Yen Man For This Useful Post:
Old 12-05-2025, 11:46 AM   #66
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Flames played at their best capacity, Minnesota was terrible by their standards. The worst team wins games when that happens. Unless the Flames never try at all, they will win those kind of games.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2025, 12:39 PM   #67
442scotty
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Hopefully someone wants to trade for Andersson etc before the team wins too much and the brass things they can make the playoffs!
442scotty is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2025, 12:56 PM   #68
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 442scotty View Post
Hopefully someone wants to trade for Andersson etc before the team wins too much and the brass things they can make the playoffs!
Rasmus would be the first asset that the Flames have ever let walk to free agency under Conroy in that scenario, don’t think you have much to worry about.
Aarongavey is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Aarongavey For This Useful Post:
Old 12-05-2025, 01:13 PM   #69
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameX View Post
The Vancouver Canucks of all teams are now 32nd. A team that consists of Boeser, Pettersson and Hughes. A team with 3 stars to beat us out of a better chance at 1st overall. Then there's Flordia right there as well.

This is going to turn into a Buffalo rebuild if they keep delaying the inevitable.

A huge thing to say right now but the frustration is valid.
In no way is that a stab at Conny, I believe in what he's doing for the organization. The rest of upper managment has me saying otherwise.

We had to watch the Canucks dominate most of the 2010's
Recently watch the Oilers dominate (if you can even call it that) the 2020's.
Last thing this fanbase needs is another divisional rival to have a generational talent.

I understand it's still early in the season but the scare/frustration is there.
Those two are nothing too special
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2025, 01:16 PM   #70
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Record needed to ...

Make the playoffs : 105 point pace the rest of the way.
To NOT draft in the top 10 : 96 point pace the rest of the way.
To NOT draft in the top 5 : 87 point pace the rest of the way.
Just curious what are you using as the playoff number? Because currently the pace is quite low
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2025, 01:20 PM   #71
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Yen Man View Post
I agree that we never know what to expect. But I am still of the gut feeling when all's said and done, Flames will still be drafting top 5 this season. Maybe that's wishful thinking on my part, but I don't feel any panic yet until they go on a 10 game heater lol.

At the end of the day, I'm with you. I do now subconsciously cheer for losses, even though before I was on the anti tank side. Maybe it's the Maloney thing that rubbed me the wrong way. I just really want the team performance to spell out to upper management that this team is clearly not good enough, and continuing to spin their wheels is the worst way to run this franchise. We have an opportunity to draft a high end guy, and we refuse to do so?
They need to draft 1-2 though. Not top 5. Need McKenna.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2025, 01:22 PM   #72
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
They need to draft 1-2 though. Not top 5. Need McKenna.
If McKenna goes number one he will be the 4th best first overall pick in the last 4 years.
Aarongavey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2025, 01:24 PM   #73
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
If McKenna goes number one he will be the 4th best first overall pick in the last 4 years.
Maybe! But still the best prospect by far the Flames will have.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2025, 01:24 PM   #74
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
They need to draft 1-2 though. Not top 5. Need McKenna.
The worst team in the NHL most likely drafts #3
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2025, 01:26 PM   #75
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
The worst team in the NHL most likely drafts #3
Better than 8th or 9th. By a long shot. Or even 5th.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2025, 01:30 PM   #76
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
They need to draft 1-2 though. Not top 5. Need McKenna.
For me it's top 4. One of McKenna, Stenberg, Lawrence or Verhoeff.

Any of those 4 and I'm thrilled.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 12-05-2025, 01:32 PM   #77
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
Better than 8th or 9th. By a long shot. Or even 5th.
sure, YOU just said it has to be 1 or 2 not me. Just telling you the odds so don't get your hopes up. An 0-82 team is most likely to draft 3rd.
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2025, 02:24 PM   #78
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Just curious what are you using as the playoff number? Because currently the pace is quite low
8th place team based on win percentage and the record the Flames need going forward to beat that level by a point.
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
edmonton is no good


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:46 AM.

Calgary Flames
2025-26






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy