Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-04-2025, 12:59 PM   #27781
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven View Post
America only cares about Canada's military spending if we are giving all of that money to America.

Now that we have moved our submarine spending away from the US, that is a big number of billions of dollars we are no longer handing over.

If we dump the F-35 for the Gripen then that would be another stack of billions that we are no longer gifting to America. Moving to the Gripen would be a huge win for Canada as Saab have actually committed to set up manufacturing in Canada for the jets, which would create Canadian jobs and enable Canada to have more control over the assets.

That last part is a big deal as there are many rumours around the US having kill switches in the F-35. 3 million lines of code inside blackboxes in the jets that we are not allowed to audit or adjust.

Once Canada stops handing over piles of money to the US, will they care anymore what we spend on the military? I bet not.
Germany
Sweden
South Korea
Maybe the Pommies


Those are the countries that would should be purchasing killing equipment from.
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to undercoverbrother For This Useful Post:
Old 11-04-2025, 01:02 PM   #27782
peter12
Franchise Player
 
peter12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Exp:
Default

but we should also be buying the F-35.
peter12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 01:03 PM   #27783
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peter12 View Post
but we should also be buying the F-35.
From the country that threatened to annex you? It still doesn't sit right with me.
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to TheIronMaiden For This Useful Post:
Old 11-04-2025, 01:06 PM   #27784
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by undercoverbrother View Post
Germany
Sweden
South Korea
Maybe the Pommies


Those are the countries that would should be purchasing killing equipment from.
Ya, what I like about both strategies is that they have a significant push for domestication. Both the Korea and German submarine offers comes with building facilities in Canada (Vancouver and Maritimes) to build an service the subs.

Saab is also talking about building their jets in Canada and giving us the ability to maintain them properly ourselves. Definitely a plan that suggests partnership and respect.

America has no interest in this strategy. They want us to hand over piles of money to get their equipment and then hand over more piles of money to maintain and support. At no point have their plans indicated shifting any of the work, jobs, or money back into Canada.

Also, taking this business away from the US hurts red states more than any other.
__________________
Wolven is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Wolven For This Useful Post:
Old 11-04-2025, 01:08 PM   #27785
peter12
Franchise Player
 
peter12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Exp:
Default

We should be buying the German sub. Far more practical and dependable design. South Korean sub is very cool but has some capabilities we don't need and a lot of unproven tech.
peter12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 01:09 PM   #27786
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peter12 View Post
but we should also be buying the F-35.
We should accept the 16 F-35s that we are already committed to.

The rest of the order should transition to the Gripen. There is really no reason to keep buying F-35s.

The Gripens are more cost effective. They are willing to partner with Canada and build local manufacturing jobs. They are designed for colder climates than the F-35 can handle. They do not have secret kill switches that another country can control.

Why would we want a F-35?
__________________
Wolven is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wolven For This Useful Post:
Old 11-04-2025, 01:09 PM   #27787
peter12
Franchise Player
 
peter12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven View Post
Ya, what I like about both strategies is that they have a significant push for domestication. Both the Korea and German submarine offers comes with building facilities in Canada (Vancouver and Maritimes) to build an service the subs.

Saab is also talking about building their jets in Canada and giving us the ability to maintain them properly ourselves. Definitely a plan that suggests partnership and respect.

America has no interest in this strategy. They want us to hand over piles of money to get their equipment and then hand over more piles of money to maintain and support. At no point have their plans indicated shifting any of the work, jobs, or money back into Canada.

Also, taking this business away from the US hurts red states more than any other.
Canada manufactures a ton of parts for the F-35.
peter12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 01:10 PM   #27788
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven View Post
We should accept the 16 F-35s that we are already committed to.

The rest of the order should transition to the Gripen. There is really no reason to keep buying F-35s.

The Gripens are more cost effective. They are willing to partner with Canada and build local manufacturing jobs. They are designed for colder climates than the F-35 can handle. They do not have secret kill switches that another country can control.

Why would we want a F-35?
Also the ignition switch is on the floor by the handbrake
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to undercoverbrother For This Useful Post:
Old 11-04-2025, 01:25 PM   #27789
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peter12 View Post
Canada manufactures a ton of parts for the F-35.
America's tariffs eliminate the benefit of that. Each part we send across the border now has a tariff tagged onto it and then we get to buy those parts back at a hugely inflated price.

In every way we are better off to eliminate the US from the process.
__________________
Wolven is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 02:13 PM   #27790
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

And it sounds like Canada would get a chunk of manufacturing for the Gripen. The US isn't our only option.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 02:14 PM   #27791
peter12
Franchise Player
 
peter12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Exp:
Default

The US is, and will always be, our best option. Diversifying trade is good, but I don't think many Canadians know what that will actually entail, so instead, it just feels good to say.
peter12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 02:25 PM   #27792
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Best not to do anything.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 02:30 PM   #27793
Lubicon
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
Best not to do anything.
That's pretty much been our strategy for the past 40 years. Not working....
Lubicon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lubicon For This Useful Post:
Old 11-04-2025, 02:32 PM   #27794
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
Best not to do anything.
He’s right though. Partisanship rules the day these days.

For example, we need a pipeline to the BC coast. Smiths trying to get that done, but you hate her guts so presumably you’re against it. Correct me if I’m wrong. Can’t see you supporting her on that, but it’s absolutely needed if we’re serious about deleveraging from the USA.

The idea hadn’t been floated for 5 mins and didn’t even have details (because the point was to announce the work is going to be done to get the details), and you have the BC premier instantly saying no deal (to what deal? Why say no? Bizarre approach).

This isn’t a country, and we aren’t serious about working together as one.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Mr.Coffee For This Useful Post:
Old 11-04-2025, 02:36 PM   #27795
peter12
Franchise Player
 
peter12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Exp:
Default

Remember when everybody was absolutely adamant that there would be no more internal trade barriers? It seems so long ago...

The Canadian federation is broken and BC and QC have led the charge to finish it off.
peter12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 02:39 PM   #27796
Wormius
Franchise Player
 
Wormius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
Exp:
Default

I think there is some really interesting hypocrisy going on with this game Alberta is trying to play. The federal government has to force BC to allow a pipeline through to the coast, meanwhile the federal government should f-off and give Alberta complete autonomy over its resources.
Wormius is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wormius For This Useful Post:
Old 11-04-2025, 02:40 PM   #27797
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
He’s right though. Partisanship rules the day these days.

For example, we need a pipeline to the BC coast. Smiths trying to get that done, but you hate her guts so presumably you’re against it. Correct me if I’m wrong. Can’t see you supporting her on that, but it’s absolutely needed if we’re serious about deleveraging from the USA.

The idea hadn’t been floated for 5 mins and didn’t even have details (because the point was to announce the work is going to be done to get the details), and you have the BC premier instantly saying no deal (to what deal? Why say no? Bizarre approach).

This isn’t a country, and we aren’t serious about working together as one.
If we require to exploit oil and gas to survive as a country, we are not going to last long for some very real reasons.

It'd be great if we could have another pipeline and I'd support one that makes sense, as I did TMX and gas exports. Competing interests make this extremely challenging, and I'm not 100% on board with throwing out other interests for that. Depends entirely on what it is, which I suspect is similar to Eby's position(though I don't know much about it).

And no, I absolutely don't support Smith because she is completely untrustworthy and can't manage a Tylenol order, I want her nowhere near any purse strings related to a project that large. You should perhaps give that some second thought as well. Unless you like the tax dollar toilet she's doing her best to plug up on the backs of our hard work.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 02:40 PM   #27798
peter12
Franchise Player
 
peter12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius View Post
I think there is some really interesting hypocrisy going on with this game Alberta is trying to play. The federal government has to force BC to allow a pipeline through to the coast, meanwhile the federal government should f-off and give Alberta complete autonomy over its resources.
What are you talking about?

Canada was formed as an economic union and the federal government is designed to help solve cross-jurisdictional issues like pipelines. It just didn't do its job very well.
peter12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 02:41 PM   #27799
peter12
Franchise Player
 
peter12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
If we require to exploit oil and gas to survive as a country, we are not going to last long for some very real reasons.

It'd be great if we could have another pipeline and I'd support one that makes sense, as I did TMX and gas exports. Competing interests make this extremely challenging, and I'm not 100% on board with throwing out other interests for that. Depends entirely on what it is, which I suspect is similar to Eby's position(though I don't know much about it).

And no, I absolutely don't support Smith because she is completely untrustworthy and can't manage a Tylenol order, I want her nowhere near any purse strings related to a project that large. You should perhaps give that some second thought as well. Unless you like the tax dollar toilet she's doing her best to plug up on the backs of our hard work.
Well, we don't currently have a ton of other options, Fuzz.
peter12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 02:43 PM   #27800
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peter12 View Post
The US is, and will always be, our best option. Diversifying trade is good, but I don't think many Canadians know what that will actually entail, so instead, it just feels good to say.
Your declaration and insight is as deep as a kiddie pool.

The US is not our best option. They are not even a reasonable option. While their current administration is hostile toward our country, our best option for equipping our military is to partner with any country that is not actively talking about attacking our sovereignty.

We may be very critical of Carney's budget today but he has done some heavy lifting to actually diversify our trade away from the US. You and many other Canadians may not understand it, or even be aware of it, but it is happening anyway and we should embrace the effort full force.

Stopping your mindset of "America First" is how Canada transitions into the new world order as America burns all of its alliances and partnerships to the ground.
__________________
Wolven is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wolven For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:49 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy