08-01-2025, 02:04 PM
|
#3201
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
It's not actually technically feasible to do without breaking Ontario's grid. However, adding export taxes to electricity sold to the US would virtually do the same thing. A 200% electricity export duty would make energy unaffordable to a few states. Sadly, they are blue states and probably wouldn't change anyone's mind
|
Cutting exports of electricity to the US would also likely create very significant economic issues in Ontario. They would lose that stream of revenue because they won't be able to find a new market due to inter-ties. If they lose that revenue it means that Hydro One will have to make up for those losses and that means higher rates for the people of Ontario.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to calgarygeologist For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-01-2025, 02:37 PM
|
#3202
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by activeStick
Yup the fentanyl part is correct. I saw someone explain that a couple of days ago on the news.
|
Legally he needs a “national security threat” to bypass congress and impose tariffs himself. Fentanyl is supposed to be that threat. This is a good synopsis:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-...peal-1.7597895
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mogg For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-01-2025, 02:50 PM
|
#3203
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by direwolf
At this point I'd be fine with Canada walking away from the table for a while. Tell this dips*** administration that we'll come back and talk again when they're ready to be serious.
|
There's really nothing to discuss. I get, they're our neighbors and largest trading partner so discussions will always happen on a variety of topics until the end of time. Still, I don't imagine trying to negotiate with a literal pedophile and his entourage of pedo-enablers is an easy task when the Americans don't argue in good faith. There's nothing to discuss at the moment and it's all a waste of time, especially when an executive order can easily rip up whatever agreement is agreed upon.
Stay the course. Keep diversifying and finding new trade deals. Help local businesses survive. Make it known to them that until adults who are serious come to the big boy table to negotiate and not a pedophile, there's nothing to discuss. Hell, make the negotiation contingent on the Epstein files being released. Trump loves to troll, so troll them back.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Huntingwhale For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-01-2025, 04:23 PM
|
#3204
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: wearing raccoons for boots
|
Maybe just start flicking the power switch on and off...
|
|
|
08-01-2025, 05:12 PM
|
#3205
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
I think we should put export Tarrifs on Potash as a retaliation.
|
Potash, uranium and energy. They don’t need it anyway, so it wouldn’t really matter to them, right?
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Slava For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-01-2025, 10:53 PM
|
#3206
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
Potash, uranium and energy. They don’t need it anyway, so it wouldn’t really matter to them, right?
|
Electricity is the best option, because it can't really be stored (things like potash and oil they have large amounts stored) and it takes a huge amount of time/infrastructure to get it elsewhere. Potash/oil if they decide to start buying Russian instead the ships will be loaded immediately. But new electric transmission/plants take years to build. Uranium they have enough stored to last until Trump is no longer president even if that requires him to die of old age.
Probably "all of the above" is the right choice, but electricity is where their balls are in a vice so if we need to squeeze that's the biggest pain point.
|
|
|
08-01-2025, 11:08 PM
|
#3207
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86
Electricity is the best option, because it can't really be stored (things like potash and oil they have large amounts stored) and it takes a huge amount of time/infrastructure to get it elsewhere. Potash/oil if they decide to start buying Russian instead the ships will be loaded immediately. But new electric transmission/plants take years to build. Uranium they have enough stored to last until Trump is no longer president even if that requires him to die of old age.
Probably "all of the above" is the right choice, but electricity is where their balls are in a vice so if we need to squeeze that's the biggest pain point.
|
I think the Canada just needs to stay the course and keep playing hardball in negotiations. Keeping our cool and not escalating anything is our best option right now.
Last edited by direwolf; 08-01-2025 at 11:37 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to direwolf For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-02-2025, 07:02 AM
|
#3208
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86
Electricity is the best option, because it can't really be stored (things like potash and oil they have large amounts stored) and it takes a huge amount of time/infrastructure to get it elsewhere. Potash/oil if they decide to start buying Russian instead the ships will be loaded immediately. But new electric transmission/plants take years to build. Uranium they have enough stored to last until Trump is no longer president even if that requires him to die of old age.
Probably "all of the above" is the right choice, but electricity is where their balls are in a vice so if we need to squeeze that's the biggest pain point.
|
Sure, and they do maintain uranium and oil reserves, but they don’t for potash. They also don’t produce enough uranium or potash domestically to meet their needs, so while those aren’t issues that are as immediate as electricity, they’re not in a position to not import them.
I also kind of like that slower squeeze for the negotiation process. They can put in a brave face and still tell everyone that what we’re doing doesn’t matter, but behind the scenes they full well that this is going to be a problem. Cutting electricity has that immediate impact, and while that’s satisfying, it’s probably going to make negotiations more hostile.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Slava For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-02-2025, 01:20 PM
|
#3209
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
Sure, and they do maintain uranium and oil reserves, but they don’t for potash. They also don’t produce enough uranium or potash domestically to meet their needs, so while those aren’t issues that are as immediate as electricity, they’re not in a position to not import them.
I also kind of like that slower squeeze for the negotiation process. They can put in a brave face and still tell everyone that what we’re doing doesn’t matter, but behind the scenes they full well that this is going to be a problem. Cutting electricity has that immediate impact, and while that’s satisfying, it’s probably going to make negotiations more hostile.
|
Nuclear power plants keep years worth of fuel on-site because they can't just shut them off whenever. So that's a real long-game type situation.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:55 AM.
|
|