Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-13-2025, 11:35 AM   #16981
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
It all comes down to personal preference but after traveling to both several times.

Southern California >>> Northern California

Summerlin in Nevada is a pretty awesome place to live as well
I've never been Northern California. Southern California is great, but I would hate to live in the L.A area. Even if you live in one of the nice areas which I am sure most NHLers do, the city is just bonkers. Different stroke for different folks of course. The small towns outside of the L.A. commutershed are fantastic though, they just wouldn't be practical if you had to commute into the city all the time. I feel the same way about New York too, I could not do it and be happy.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2025, 11:51 AM   #16982
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by howard_the_duck View Post
So much will depend on the team's start.

Start poor and dig a hole for yourself, having a high draft pick in sight (especially in this draft) and I could see the team more aggressively pursuing moving the vets like Kadri at that point. NMC or no NMC, nothing's off the table.
I think this will have more bearing on Coleman and Backlund. I think Kadri’s in for the long haul.


…..btw, for all the tankers out there this is what they should be arguing for. If you want the Flames to tank, remove their two tough min. forwards and watch the bottom completely fall out. Losing Kadri would hurt but losing Coleman, or especially Backlund, I think would hurt more. Lose both? Good night.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2025, 12:06 PM   #16983
iloveicedhockey
First Line Centre
 
iloveicedhockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by howard_the_duck View Post
So much will depend on the team's start.

Start poor and dig a hole for yourself, having a high draft pick in sight (especially in this draft) and I could see the team more aggressively pursuing moving the vets like Kadri at that point. NMC or no NMC, nothing's off the table.
Well, if Kadri doesn't want to move, trading him is certainly off the table (because of his NMC) until the NTC kicks in.

Last edited by iloveicedhockey; 06-13-2025 at 12:41 PM.
iloveicedhockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2025, 12:11 PM   #16984
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iloveicedhockey View Post
Well, if kadri doesn't want to move, trading him is certainly off the table until the NTC kicks in.
To clarify, he has an NMC,
flambers is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2025, 12:14 PM   #16985
Macho0978
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flambers View Post
To clarify, he has an NMC,
His NTC kicks in next year though.
Macho0978 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2025, 12:15 PM   #16986
mile
Franchise Player
 
mile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/user/status/1933582822234521805
mile is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to mile For This Useful Post:
Old 06-13-2025, 12:17 PM   #16987
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Fffffffff
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2025, 12:17 PM   #16988
Macho0978
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mile View Post
Prefer the move up but interested who this high-end talent is. Rossi was rumored to be for 1 1st, has to be someone better, I hope.
Macho0978 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Macho0978 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-13-2025, 12:17 PM   #16989
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978 View Post
His NTC kicks in next year though.
Why would that matter, he has an NMC,

(i.e. a team cannot trade him or waive him without the players approval)
flambers is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2025, 12:18 PM   #16990
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Watch it be for Byram lol

(kidding...mostly)
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2025, 12:22 PM   #16991
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
and SLC is gorgeous too.

Saying SJ is an easy choice over the cities is crazy - all are beautiful and people have... you know... personal opinions.
Almost like it was a personal opinion.
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2025, 12:23 PM   #16992
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mile View Post
Andersson + 18 + 32: What pick/player do you move that package for?
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2025, 12:23 PM   #16993
Samonadreau
Franchise Player
 
Samonadreau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flambers View Post
Why would that matter, he has an NMC,

(i.e. a team cannot trade him or waive him without the players approval)
Starting in 26/27 he has a modified NTC so he has all the NMC except for there are 19 teams he can still be traded to.

The other parts of the NMC still apply, like he cant be sent to the minors or be available in expansion draft.

Edit: Actually looks like his NMC drops completely and its just the 13 team no trade list.

Last edited by Samonadreau; 06-13-2025 at 12:32 PM.
Samonadreau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2025, 12:27 PM   #16994
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Andersson + 18 + 32: What pick/player do you move that package for?
Does that get Utah on the phone for number 4?
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2025, 12:29 PM   #16995
Tbull8
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Does that get Utah on the phone for number 4?
Could Ras + 32 get you up to Detroits pick?
Tbull8 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2025, 12:29 PM   #16996
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

If it's to move up in the draft then it probably just speaks to them not loving the depth in this draft and wanting to get one of the guys they see as a top center.

I actually wonder if Pittsburgh would do 11 for 18+32 or if Buffalo would try to trade back to get more trade ammo.

Pittsburgh probably looking for more ammo to be able to add some NHL pieces, and getting 18+32 could allow them to move back 7 spots, but gain a 1st round pick to trade for a player that helps them now.

Pick 11: Perri Pick Value - 31.99

Pick 18: Perri Pick Value - 20.94
Pick 32: Perri Pick Value - 10.38
Total Perri Pick Value - 31.32

Buffalo - similar situation where they want to make some strides next year. Might be open to gaining some trade capital by moving back in the draft:

Pick 9: Perri Pick Value - 36.66

Pick 18: Perri Pick Value - 20.94
Pick 32: Perri Pick Value - 10.38
Total Perri Pick Value - 31.32

Both of those are pretty close in value to a move from last year - Buffalo sent 11 to San Jose for 14 and 42

In terms of higher end talent it really all depends who they are targeting - if it's a player like Shane Wright I wouldn't lose sleep over them moving 18 and 32 for him.

Last edited by SuperMatt18; 06-13-2025 at 12:42 PM.
SuperMatt18 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2025, 12:31 PM   #16997
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Andersson + 18 + 32: What pick/player do you move that package for?
I don’t think they get a player back that’d they win on. If a team likes and can re-sign Anderson it will get them into the top ten I’d think but then I’m not sure it is worth it get a 9th or something
Bonded is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2025, 12:31 PM   #16998
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Does that get Utah on the phone for number 4?
I think it would at least start the conversation just because of where Utah is at in their cycle. Team wants to improve now, they have a bunch of young studs already playing and just drafted Iginla. I could see it.
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2025, 12:34 PM   #16999
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Does that get Utah on the phone for number 4?
Not unless Utah really values Anderson and he is willing to sign an extension there.

I have no idea on either question, but have trouble believing Utah is his preferred destination.

He also might prefer going UFA to increase his choices and payday.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2025, 12:40 PM   #17000
Macho0978
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
If it's to move up in the draft then it probably just speaks to them not loving the depth in this draft and wanting to get one of the guys they see as a top center.

In terms of higher end talent it really all depends who they are targeting - if it's a player like Shane Wright I wouldn't lose sleep over them moving 18 and 32 for him.
I think it's all about the center, not so much the depth of the draft. We already have depth; Conroy has to know a chance at a #1 center is what is needed.

2014 was a weak draft, especially compared to the next draft in 2015 that had McDavid and Eichel who were 1st OV for sure in 2014. Draisaitl and Bennett went 3 and 4. Draisaitl is up there with anyone in the league. 2014 had 6 out of 10 players in the top 10 turn out vs 8 in 2015.

2017 was weak too, Heiskanen and Makar went 3 & 4

2018 was supposed to be weak but B Tkachuk went 4 and Hughes went 6. A lot of misses in 2018 though.
Macho0978 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Macho0978 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:45 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy