Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-01-2025, 07:43 PM   #14001
Royle9
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Would Nemec, Mercer, Silayev, 1st 2026 for Hughes make sense for both teams?

Heard them talking on the Fan that Rutherford made comments about Quinn wanting to go to NJ to play with his brothers.
I don’t think there’s a trade where Vancouver wins with NJD but I’d say your value is pretty darn close for arguably the 2nd best Dman in the league.

Vancouvers issue is that Hughes has complete control and will only go to NJ.
Royle9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2025, 07:45 PM   #14002
traptor
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Would Nemec, Mercer, Silayev, 1st 2026 for Hughes make sense for both teams?

Heard them talking on the Fan that Rutherford made comments about Quinn wanting to go to NJ to play with his brothers.
It's alot of assets but it would send the Canucks into a rebuild. But if hughes demands out what choice do they have.


They could try to target hischer but I doubt the devils entertain that.
I dont think Bratt cuts it,but maybe Bratt++

Theyll never "win" a prime Q Hughes trade, especially because if he demands out it's probably only to the one team



It would be ROUGH for Vancouver to lose their entire core except Petterson lmao.
traptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2025, 08:11 AM   #14003
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Royle9 View Post
I don’t think there’s a trade where Vancouver wins with NJD but I’d say your value is pretty darn close for arguably the 2nd best Dman in the league.

Vancouvers issue is that Hughes has complete control and will only go to NJ.
It is interesting that NJ is likely the desired destination and they happen to have several pieces a team like Vancouver would want.

Could that ownership group be sold on a full rebuild one year after winning the division and getting to game 7 of the second round?

Trade Hughes and Pettersson to start over? Kind of makes sense
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2025, 08:15 AM   #14004
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

The question is how much is NJ going to give up when they know they can just sign him as a UFA in 2 years.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2025, 08:22 AM   #14005
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
The question is how much is NJ going to give up when they know they can just sign him as a UFA in 2 years.
I would think they rather capitalize on having all 3 Hughes brothers in their prime at the best cap hits they will ever be.

After missing the playoffs last year to one of the lowest teams to qualify this year and a quick 5 game exit there is likely interest in NJ to try and win asap
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 05-02-2025, 08:25 AM   #14006
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Sure but that's still why if I was Vancouver, and I believe he's leaving in 2 years, you trade him now to the highest bidder and give NJ a chance to beat the best offer. At this stage, 2 years of him is still great value to other teams, but as that window shrinks the leverage shifts to NJD.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 05-02-2025, 08:35 AM   #14007
Monahammer
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Yes, all teams and their management should remove sentimentality from player decisions.

Jiri, curious why you believe this is a good take for the Canucks but don't seem to support similar tactics for flames management?

If this were a flames player we would be talking about convincing him over the next two years or something.
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2025, 08:38 AM   #14008
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer View Post
Yes, all teams and their management should remove sentimentality from player decisions.

Jiri, curious why you believe this is a good take for the Canucks but don't seem to support similar tactics for flames management?
This is a completely different level of player here and a completely different situations where it is well known that he is likely to join his brothers in NJD. Different player and different situation.

But I would have been fine if the Flames had traded Andersson last season, this summer, this season. You make the trade when you get the value.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer View Post
If this were a flames player we would be talking about convincing him over the next two years or something.
No. That's not something I've advocated for.

I think you are mis-representing once again my previous stances.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2025, 09:31 AM   #14009
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Would Nemec, Mercer, Silayev, 1st 2026 for Hughes make sense for both teams?

Heard them talking on the Fan that Rutherford made comments about Quinn wanting to go to NJ to play with his brothers.
That does seem like as fair a deal as you could get when trading one of the top two defencemen in the entire league. A trade like that would be a great start to a rebuild. Obviously New Jersey is getting the best player in the deal so you would think the cost would be high. Only problem is that Hughes has a full NTC so he could dictate where he goes. If it’s only New Jersey that he is willing to be traded to, it could diminish the return.

Overall, a trade like that would be smart in the long run for Vancouver to do right now. It’s potentially 2 young top four defencemen, a top six forward and a first round pick. On top of that, it sets Vancouver up to likely be in the bottom 5 of the league next season and have a shot at McKenna. Obviously it’s mostly magic beans but if it’s clear that Hughes wants to leave, they should maximize his return and doing it early should do that.

Last edited by stemit14; 05-02-2025 at 09:36 AM.
stemit14 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2025, 09:31 AM   #14010
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer View Post
Yes, all teams and their management should remove sentimentality from player decisions.

Jiri, curious why you believe this is a good take for the Canucks but don't seem to support similar tactics for flames management?

If this were a flames player we would be talking about convincing him over the next two years or something.
If the Flames had Hughes of course most fans would want to keep him. That’s not really a gotcha. However, the Canucks imploded and if he wants out either way then should trade him. I would be surprised if they don’t give it one more kick at the can next year though.
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2025, 10:41 AM   #14011
YyjFlames
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14 View Post
That does seem like as fair a deal as you could get when trading one of the top two defencemen in the entire league. A trade like that would be a great start to a rebuild. Obviously New Jersey is getting the best player in the deal so you would think the cost would be high. Only problem is that Hughes has a full NTC so he could dictate where he goes. If it’s only New Jersey that he is willing to be traded to, it could diminish the return.

Overall, a trade like that would be smart in the long run for Vancouver to do right now. It’s potentially 2 young top four defencemen, a top six forward and a first round pick. On top of that, it sets Vancouver up to likely be in the bottom 5 of the league next season and have a shot at McKenna. Obviously it’s mostly magic beans but if it’s clear that Hughes wants to leave, they should maximize his return and doing it early should do that.
There are a lot of similarities to the Tkachuk deal... sure Hughes could demand he gets traded to only New Jersey, but if he's not a little flexible, Vancouver will probably just hold onto him and he'll have to continue to play on a pour team, potentially diminishing his stock... and if the environment really is as negative and bad as it sounds, two years in a place you really don't want to be would suck.

And if New Jersey plays it like he's a guarantee and doesn't offer Vancouver enough value, Vancouver will just hold onto him, and will over time have a better chance to get Hughes to accept a trade elsewhere for a fair value -- to a team that might resign him and NJ might lose out.

I personally think if Hughes really wants to get traded, Vancouver will get a list of 3-5 teams from him and go to work--like the Flames did with Tkachuk.
YyjFlames is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2025, 11:17 AM   #14012
mile
Franchise Player
 
mile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/user/status/1918343570202784184
mile is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mile For This Useful Post:
Old 05-02-2025, 11:36 AM   #14013
Lewis_D
Scoring Winger
 
Lewis_D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Victoria, BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mile View Post
I'm genuinely surprised a guy who dressed like this on his draft day doesn't want to be in Florida.

Lewis_D is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Lewis_D For This Useful Post:
Old 05-02-2025, 11:55 AM   #14014
mrdonkey
Franchise Player
 
mrdonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lewis_D View Post
I'm genuinely surprised a guy who dressed like this on his draft day doesn't want to be in Florida.

This has NYR written all over it.
mrdonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2025, 12:11 PM   #14015
Samonadreau
Franchise Player
 
Samonadreau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
Exp:
Default

Definitely an interesting team to pass up on.
Samonadreau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2025, 12:12 PM   #14016
Ped
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Yeah, you would think Tampa would need cheap depth and there would be a golden opportunity to make the team.
Ped is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2025, 12:13 PM   #14017
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

So because he is a first rounder, would that mean that the teams that holds his rights in 2026 gets the 31st compensation pick, or is that only the Lightning if he stays?
Robbob is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2025, 12:16 PM   #14018
Buff
Franchise Player
 
Buff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lewis_D View Post
I'm genuinely surprised a guy who dressed like this on his draft day doesn't want to be in Florida.

He does. That pic screams of Miami Heat. He wants to sign with the Panthers.
Buff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2025, 12:16 PM   #14019
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob View Post
So because he is a first rounder, would that mean that the teams that holds his rights in 2026 gets the 31st compensation pick, or is that only the Lightning if he stays?
Wouldn’t it be the 33rd pick? 31st is the second last pick in the first round now that there are 32 teams
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2025, 12:17 PM   #14020
Ped
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob View Post
So because he is a first rounder, would that mean that the teams that holds his rights in 2026 gets the 31st compensation pick, or is that only the Lightning if he stays?

Isn't the compensatory pick the same pick but in the second round?
Ped is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ped For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:48 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy