03-06-2025, 04:05 PM
|
#23901
|
Loves Teh Chat!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by puffnstuff
|
In the article you posted. Yeesh. Walking away from $6B from the Feds. Well yes Jones, it's not sustainable if you walk away from the Feds' funding agreement. We're at $15 so it's not like we're that far off. If Manitoba can find a way to do get to $10/day (and they already have), I think Alberta can cobble together the pennies.
Quote:
In that letter, which Jones posted on social media, he said Alberta wants a new deal that steers away from the previous agreement's goal of universal $10-per-day child care, which he described as "unsustainable and not supporting the families who need it most."
"If Minister Jones wants to walk away from a program that helps over 100,000 Alberta families save up to $11,000 per child every year, that's on him. But he can look parents in the eye and explain why he's throwing their savings and child-care stability out the window," her press secretary, Geneviève Lemaire, told CBC News at the time.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Torture For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-06-2025, 04:05 PM
|
#23902
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
an energy economist on CBC the other morning suggested that we don't need export tariffs. we need to consider another curtailment strategy to slightly reduce production volumes and raise the price a little. the increase will remove what is left of the discount and then become the basis of Trump tariffs
Alberta did that in 2019 under Notley. apparently Kenny didn't stop the practice until 2021.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to para transit fellow For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-06-2025, 04:47 PM
|
#23903
|
All I can get
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman
I’m seriously considering filing a complaint about his treasonous actions being a violation of his legal oath. I have doubts about his mental capacity too.
|
I'm hearing there are wheels in motion regarding this
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Reggie Dunlop For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-06-2025, 04:54 PM
|
#23904
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Didn't AB do this the last time the Feds brough out Child Care subsidy/initiatives? Stuck their nose up and didn't play ball until months later?
|
|
|
03-06-2025, 06:05 PM
|
#23905
|
Loves Teh Chat!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
Didn't AB do this the last time the Feds brough out Child Care subsidy/initiatives? Stuck their nose up and didn't play ball until months later?
|
Yep
|
|
|
03-07-2025, 07:26 AM
|
#23906
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: wearing raccoons for boots
|
“Alberta Health Services wrote off the Turkish inventory in 2023-24, valuing the massive stockpile at $0, according to the documents. Alberta paid roughly $20.4-million for the 1.4 million bottles of acetaminophen and ibuprofen it is now looking to unload, according to the documents.”
Smith is reportedly considering shipping it to Ukraine
|
|
|
03-07-2025, 08:08 AM
|
#23907
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by puffnstuff
“Alberta Health Services wrote off the Turkish inventory in 2023-24, valuing the massive stockpile at $0, according to the documents. Alberta paid roughly $20.4-million for the 1.4 million bottles of acetaminophen and ibuprofen it is now looking to unload, according to the documents.”
Smith is reportedly considering shipping it to Ukraine
|
Haven't they suffered enough?
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-07-2025, 08:39 AM
|
#23908
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Chocolah
|
Listened to a podcast yesterday and the guests (two were from YYC) were talking about how a pipeline across the provinces is probably not likely. it's a decade out if it happens and we should focus on either a smaller goal of getting it to the west coast or instead of pipeline, using rail. I know little to nothing on the rail subject, anyone got any insight on the history of that or the likelihood it could work? Or articles from the bootlickin MSM I could read?
__________________
I'm afraid of children identifying as cats and dogs. - Tuco
|
|
|
03-07-2025, 08:51 AM
|
#23909
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrButtons
Listened to a podcast yesterday and the guests (two were from YYC) were talking about how a pipeline across the provinces is probably not likely. it's a decade out if it happens and we should focus on either a smaller goal of getting it to the west coast or instead of pipeline, using rail. I know little to nothing on the rail subject, anyone got any insight on the history of that or the likelihood it could work? Or articles from the bootlickin MSM I could read?
|
The bottom line is that while all the premiers say things like "we need to reduce inter-provincial trade barriers and work together", they still all want control and aren't making meaningful concessions on anything. It's unbelievable, but that is really where we are. I work in finance and the idea of one national regulator has been something that they have said they're working towards for as long as I can remember. That is a slam-dunk and should be easy to implement, but some provinces stand in the way and we're stuck with every province and territory having their own. I mean really...we can't have inter-provincial alcohol sales and ease of movement there, but now we hope that we're going to build oil pipelines?
The fact that the provincial governments can't work together on really easy issues makes me realise that anything complicated is just out of the question. Even in the face of what is literally an existential threat to the country, they still have their agendas and won't budge.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Slava For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-07-2025, 08:56 AM
|
#23910
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the middle
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrButtons
Listened to a podcast yesterday and the guests (two were from YYC) were talking about how a pipeline across the provinces is probably not likely. it's a decade out if it happens and we should focus on either a smaller goal of getting it to the west coast or instead of pipeline, using rail. I know little to nothing on the rail subject, anyone got any insight on the history of that or the likelihood it could work? Or articles from the bootlickin MSM I could read?
|
We already move a lot of oil by rail, so that works. The rail lines are already built, so it's just a matter of capacity. It won't be anywhere near as efficient as a pipeline, and can create cost increases in shipping goods elsewhere if the rail companies prioritize oil-by-rail.
They're also right that a 1,000km pipeline to the West Coast, even through the mountains, will be quicker and far less expensive than building a 4,000km pipeline to the East Coast, a lot of that through the Canadian Shield. Energy East's business case was only feasible for TC because they were planning on converting a natural gas pipeline through Ontario to an oil one.
So in the short term, if a federal government wanted to force a pipeline through for national interest reasons at a time when there would be the public will to do so, the Northern Gateway route to the West Coast would be the way to do it.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Roughneck For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-07-2025, 08:57 AM
|
#23911
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
The bottom line is that while all the premiers say things like "we need to reduce inter-provincial trade barriers and work together", they still all want control and aren't making meaningful concessions on anything. It's unbelievable, but that is really where we are. I work in finance and the idea of one national regulator has been something that they have said they're working towards for as long as I can remember. That is a slam-dunk and should be easy to implement, but some provinces stand in the way and we're stuck with every province and territory having their own. I mean really...we can't have inter-provincial alcohol sales and ease of movement there, but now we hope that we're going to build oil pipelines?
The fact that the provincial governments can't work together on really easy issues makes me realise that anything complicated is just out of the question. Even in the face of what is literally an existential threat to the country, they still have their agendas and won't budge.
|
Nova Scotia made a huge announcement the other day about this.
https://www.hilltimes.com/story/2025...ervers/453049/
Quote:
Meanwhile, on Feb. 25, Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston introduced a bill in his province’s legislature to get goods moving across Canadian jurisdictions through mutual recognition. That’s a process which seeks to quickly knock down internal trade barriers by having one jurisdiction accept the regulatory standards of another, rather than the more daunting task of harmonizing individual regulations. There’s a catch: the Nova Scotia law would only offer this broad and sweeping mutual recognition to provinces that reciprocate by passing similar legislation of their own.
|
|
|
|
03-07-2025, 01:20 PM
|
#23913
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by para transit fellow
|
This is only true to the extent that beer or other alcohols are substitutes for wine.
|
|
|
03-07-2025, 06:50 PM
|
#23914
|
Franchise Player
|
The race for time to make a pipeline to the East, is just how quickly the US can increase domestic capacity and start freezing out the oil sands.
A ten year timeliness is probably just fine, as long as it starts soon.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
|
|
|
03-08-2025, 04:14 AM
|
#23915
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary, Canada
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
The bottom line is that while all the premiers say things like "we need to reduce inter-provincial trade barriers and work together", they still all want control and aren't making meaningful concessions on anything. It's unbelievable, but that is really where we are. I work in finance and the idea of one national regulator has been something that they have said they're working towards for as long as I can remember. That is a slam-dunk and should be easy to implement, but some provinces stand in the way and we're stuck with every province and territory having their own. I mean really...we can't have inter-provincial alcohol sales and ease of movement there, but now we hope that we're going to build oil pipelines?
The fact that the provincial governments can't work together on really easy issues makes me realise that anything complicated is just out of the question. Even in the face of what is literally an existential threat to the country, they still have their agendas and won't budge.
|
Your post is spot on and a reflection at how badly this country is managed by every province from every political party. We just don't get it from a business and economic perspective.
I also was in finance and can recall all the talk about the benefits of a national regulator yet here we are in 2025 with the same nonsense. We literally are about as stupid of a nation where we just can't figure out basic things. Our government officials are patting themselves on the back for some loosening of alcohol sales across a border or two. Wow, really earth moving stuff.
I have said it before and I will say it again. It's by some miracle that as a people we are not a starving nation. We pretty much do some natural resource extraction, sell to the USA mostly from US affiliated companies, some stable banking/insurance and that's it.
In some ways if these tariffs go through and actually crush Canadian business, it will hopefully lead to a revolt of the electoral class to the governing people. Just because our elected officials in every province are beyond brain dead, doesn't mean we need to suffer anymore than we have to.
|
|
|
03-08-2025, 08:30 AM
|
#23916
|
Loves Teh Chat!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by para transit fellow
|
They also added a $3/bottle AGLC fee for wine shipped direct from BC to consumers recently.
|
|
|
03-08-2025, 08:39 AM
|
#23917
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torture
They also added a $3/bottle AGLC fee for wine shipped direct from BC to consumers recently.
|
It's to protect the blossoming Alberta wine industry. Who doesn't love a good dandelion wine, or maybe Wild roses and muscat, whatever the #### that is. She's just looking out for Alberta, and if costs us more, well, that's just the price of stupidity.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-08-2025, 08:40 AM
|
#23918
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
When can we vote these ####ers out ?
|
|
|
03-08-2025, 08:58 AM
|
#23919
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: wearing raccoons for boots
|
Busboobs doesnt like dissension
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calga...-ahs-1.7477691
Former Alberta infrastructure minister Peter Guthrie is barred from attending UCP caucus meetings following his recent abrupt resignation, as part of a 30-day probation period he's been placed under.
|
|
|
03-08-2025, 10:10 PM
|
#23920
|
AltaGuy has a magnetic personality and exudes positive energy, which is infectious to those around him. He has an unparalleled ability to communicate with people, whether he is speaking to a room of three or an arena of 30,000.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: At le pub...
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:10 AM.
|
|