Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-04-2025, 08:59 PM   #41
Sofa GM
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eyipyip View Post
Can’t afford to trade Andersson at this point if the Flames want to push for playoff and we have a big chance making it
I’m not sure that’s the case. Rasmus hasn’t been a stalwart the last couple months, frankly pretty replaceable.
Sofa GM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Sofa GM For This Useful Post:
Old 03-04-2025, 09:00 PM   #42
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
Every team in both the west and east chasing the 8th spot all have negative goal differentials. I don’t think I’ve seen that before. It happened with Washington last year.
The really surprising thing is that only six teams in the West have positive goal differentials. (Minnesota, at –3, could easily flip to make seven.)

That means, by normal standards, somebody who doesn't deserve to be in the playoffs is probably going to get in this year. As Doodles Weaver once said, it'll either be a photo finish or an oil painting.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2025, 09:06 PM   #43
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Didn’t know the Wild are a - as well. Kings are just a plus 8. Might just end up being Winnipeg Colorado or Vegas as the contenders out of the west. Pretty brutal.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2025, 09:21 PM   #44
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Goal differential is pretty useless unless you can remove ENGs, since those occur at times when allowing an additional goal would not affect the outcome of a game.

For example, in this game, the Flames really won by 2.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2025, 09:21 PM   #45
looooob
Franchise Player
 
looooob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
Didn’t know the Wild are a - as well. Kings are just a plus 8. Might just end up being Winnipeg Colorado or Vegas as the contenders out of the west. Pretty brutal.
Not Dallas?
looooob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2025, 09:23 PM   #46
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by looooob View Post
Not Dallas?
Forget about them. They still lack that #1 center but Johnston looks like he maybe the guy. They have been missing that piece all these years.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2025, 09:24 PM   #47
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
Goal differential is pretty useless unless you can remove ENGs, since those occur at times when allowing an additional goal would not affect the outcome of a game.

For example, in this game, the Flames really won by 2.
Unfortunately, the stats aren't set up to allow you to do that easily.

Fortunately, ENGs tend to be pretty randomly distributed among teams that lose games. Which means they tend to slightly increase the positive goal differentials of good teams and the negative goal differentials of bad teams, without really affecting the rankings.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2025, 09:33 PM   #48
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
Goal differential is pretty useless unless you can remove ENGs, since those occur at times when allowing an additional goal would not affect the outcome of a game.

For example, in this game, the Flames really won by 2.
ENG don’t make good teams a positive and don’t make bad teams look even worse.

Teams don’t pull goalies in 6-1 games.

It’s a pretty big tell tale.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2025, 09:44 PM   #49
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
ENG don’t make good teams a positive and don’t make bad teams look even worse.

Teams don’t pull goalies in 6-1 games.

It’s a pretty big tell tale.
No, a 6-1 game would likely not involve any ENGs, but two 2-1 games could easily lead to 4-1 games and end up affecting goal differential analysis.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2025, 09:47 PM   #50
Rhett44
First Line Centre
 
Rhett44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Playoffs would be crazy.
Rhett44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2025, 09:47 PM   #51
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
Unfortunately, the stats aren't set up to allow you to do that easily.

Fortunately, ENGs tend to be pretty randomly distributed among teams that lose games. Which means they tend to slightly increase the positive goal differentials of good teams and the negative goal differentials of bad teams, without really affecting the rankings.
I’m open to seeing the data, if you have any. I don’t think coaches are equally cavalier about when they will do so and encouraging(!) defensive play when it’s done. My hypothesis is that a lot of the uptick in scoring in recent years has been due to a light bulb finally going off league wide that losing by 1 or 10 is the same thing.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2025, 09:49 PM   #52
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
No, a 6-1 game would likely not involve any ENGs, but two 2-1 games could easily lead to 4-1 games and end up affecting goal differential analysis.
It’s not as easy as you make it or we would have them every game.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2025, 09:56 PM   #53
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
It’s not as easy as you make it or we would have them every game.
They are easy, even though that wasn’t my claim. If they were difficult, a team could play with an empty net all game and gain an advantage.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2025, 10:04 PM   #54
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sofa GM View Post
I’m not sure that’s the case. Rasmus hasn’t been a stalwart the last couple months, frankly pretty replaceable.
Since Rasmus isn't producing either, Carlo there would probably make us better defensively.
__________________
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2025, 10:38 PM   #55
Gaskal
Franchise Player
 
Gaskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Exp:
Default

Around the League Report




Spoiler!
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
Gaskal is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 88 Users Say Thank You to Gaskal For This Useful Post:
420since1974, 442scotty, Badmotorfinger, bdubbs, BeltlineFan, BigFlameDog, bigrangy, BlAcKNoVa, Bohica, burn_this_city, Calgary4LIfe, calgarybornnraised, Cali Panthers Fan, Charcot, chummer, Circa89, CKPThunder, CroFlames, D as in David, Demaeon, DigitalCarpenter, dino7c, Dion, Draug, drewtastic, Fighting Banana Slug, FlameFan21, FlamingHomer, FlatLandFlamesFan, Freddy, Funkhouser, FusionX, getbak, GioforPM, GoFlamesGo89, GreenLantern2814, HitterD, HockeyKhan, Hoop27, Infinit47, jaikorven, Jarome, jg13, JohnnyBeGood, KipperRules, Lanny'sDaMan, LokiMotion, McG, midniteowl, Movechkin, MrButtons, Mustache, nieuwy-89, OutToLunch, oxygen, Party Elephant, Press Level, psyang, Puppet Guy, redflamesfan08, Redrum, Reggie Dunlop, Rick M., Robbob, robertsfanatic, rogermexico, serratedmuffin, Shawn_Cronin44, Slacker, Slap_Shoot_the_Super_Shot, SmileyBing, Snuffleupagus, Steve Bozek, Stillman16, Tacoman, TangyMittz40, taxbuster, the2bears, Titan2, tknez16, topfiverecords, UKflames, Vinsta13, WhiteTiger, WinColumn, wireframe, You Need a Thneed, zuluking
Old 03-04-2025, 10:40 PM   #56
Har-Calgary
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto
Exp:
Flames

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop View Post
Farabee had a great game. He's really coming along.
Easily his best game as a flame IMO. Not just because of the shots but he even looked way faster and had more jump. I understand you get a boost playing against your old team but damn it shouldn’t make that much of an impact, anyways hopefully he continues playing this way.
Har-Calgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2025, 10:44 PM   #57
Har-Calgary
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto
Exp:
Flames

Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80 View Post
Came out of it fairly well against teams that "know how to prevent zone entries?" We went 1-2-1 against those teams, were outscored 8-1 in the three games we lost and were shutout twice. The WSH game was promising for sure, but the games against FLA, TBL and CAR most certainly were not.

It's post all-star now. Meaning teams are starting to ramp up their play. Once the trade deadline is gone the play will ramp up even higher. Scraping our way into the playoffs is a nice gesture, and it even puts a couple home gates in the owners' pockets, but if we can't beat the playoff teams now -- what are we gonna do against them when we're actually in the playoffs?


The has been a relatively fun season, and I'm not looking to ruin it for anyone, but I don't want to just fight and battle for two home playoff games every season like it's our version of a Stanley Cup. I want the actual Cup.
We actually played pretty good against Tampa, I know we didn’t score and not excusing our scoring woes but in that game I felt like we were carrying the play but just didn’t have the finish.
Har-Calgary is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Har-Calgary For This Useful Post:
Old 03-04-2025, 10:47 PM   #58
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

You’re doing Gods work here, Gaskal.
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Reggie Dunlop For This Useful Post:
Old 03-04-2025, 10:57 PM   #59
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

2 points Thursday would make this a very good trip, considering the length, travel, and opponents.

I think one point is crucial for standings, confidence and some swagger.
browna is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to browna For This Useful Post:
Old 03-05-2025, 12:20 AM   #60
Sylvanfan
Appealing my suspension
 
Sylvanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
Exp:
Default

Had you told me in September that come the end of this road trip that the Flames would be in a playoff spot I would not have believed it. So I'm enjoying this ride. If Sharky and Zary can get some confidence back and get scoring again and the Philly guys can find their games it should be fun.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
Sylvanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sylvanfan For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:20 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy