Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-27-2024, 09:08 PM   #61
IamNotKenKing
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie28 View Post
Ras was coasting the whole way to the bench. If he hustled back, it wouldn’t have looked as bad.
Ras wasn’t on the ice.
IamNotKenKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2024, 09:20 PM   #62
Andrew
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Exp:
Default

Hanley!
Andrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2024, 09:24 PM   #63
Burning Beard
#1 Goaltender
 
Burning Beard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Exp:
Default

Kind of a silly way to decide the game.
Burning Beard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2024, 09:27 PM   #64
memphusk
Franchise Player
 
memphusk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
9 points in 6 games lol

They are on a road trip, were they supposed to make changes before they left after winning 4 straight?
Yes, they should. Winning games in the shootout because you can't score is a tell tale that you can't score unless it's in a shootout.
__________________
I hate just about everyone and just about everything.
memphusk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2024, 09:38 PM   #65
D as in David
Franchise Player
 
D as in David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC View Post
To be fair, it didn't appear too dangerous because the early change took what might have been a breakaway away from ever materializing.

Andersson is the one that is supposed to covering the lead Red Wing, and had Weegar even been at the centre line when the change occurs it's an easy breakaway.

Here's how far Weegar was when Andersson hops on:


I have more issue with the first Huberdeau penalty, where the Red Wing skates back into him. But so be it.
Doing some rough trigonometry, Weegar is likely 60 to 65ft away from the bench door in that pic. Where do people expect officials to draw the line if that isn't far enough beyond the 5ft limit?

Last edited by D as in David; 11-27-2024 at 09:40 PM. Reason: edited to lower the guesstimate
D as in David is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to D as in David For This Useful Post:
Old 11-27-2024, 09:41 PM   #66
Goriders
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Lucky to get a point in that one. Detroit was in lockdown mode.
Goriders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2024, 09:42 PM   #67
Junglist
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David View Post
Doing some rough trigonometry, Weegar is likely 60 to 65ft away from the bench door in that pic. Where do people expect officials to draw the line if that isn't far enough beyond the 5ft limit?
Issue is it happens multiple times every game and this linesmen must of had some $ on the game.
Junglist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2024, 09:43 PM   #68
All In Good Time
First Line Centre
 
All In Good Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: I'm somewhere where I don't know where I am
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David View Post
Doing some rough trigonometry, Weegar is likely 60 to 65ft away from the bench door in that pic. Where do people expect officials to draw the line if that isn't far enough beyond the 5ft limit?
That a lot of free forechecking (up ice pressure)
All In Good Time is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2024, 09:47 PM   #69
All In Good Time
First Line Centre
 
All In Good Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: I'm somewhere where I don't know where I am
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Junglist View Post
Issue is it happens multiple times every game and this linesmen must of had some $ on the game.
Ha ha ha
Ahem
I mean
You really needed to say that?
You believe that?
Should there be players on the ice 70 feet behind every other player all the time?
Extrapolateing of course


No
All In Good Time is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2024, 09:58 PM   #70
Junglist
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by All In Good Time View Post
Ha ha ha
Ahem
I mean
You really needed to say that?
You believe that?
Should there be players on the ice 70 feet behind every other player all the time?
Extrapolateing of course


No
Go back to the Oilers forum you came from.
Junglist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2024, 09:58 PM   #71
D as in David
Franchise Player
 
D as in David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by All In Good Time View Post
Ha ha ha
Ahem
I mean
You really needed to say that?
You believe that?
Should there be players on the ice 70 feet behind every other player all the time?
Extrapolateing of course


No
Plus add in the forward who was still +40ft away from getting off the ice. It easily could justify two penalties for too many men. Two-too many men.
D as in David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2024, 09:59 PM   #72
Junglist
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David View Post
Plus add in the forward who was still +40ft away from getting off the ice.
Do you ref tyke and feel insulted by a bad call?
Junglist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2024, 10:00 PM   #73
D as in David
Franchise Player
 
D as in David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Junglist View Post
Do you ref tyke and feel insulted by a bad call?
By bad call do you mean your take on this penalty?
D as in David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2024, 10:01 PM   #74
Junglist
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David View Post
By bad call do you mean your take on this penalty?
Nope.
Junglist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2024, 10:02 PM   #75
D as in David
Franchise Player
 
D as in David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Junglist View Post
Nope.
You should.
D as in David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2024, 10:03 PM   #76
HighLifeMan
First Line Centre
 
HighLifeMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David View Post
Doing some rough trigonometry, Weegar is likely 60 to 65ft away from the bench door in that pic. Where do people expect officials to draw the line if that isn't far enough beyond the 5ft limit?
Talbot plays the puck at 2:05 (when this screen grab occurs and the change begins). Keep in mind The linesman does not put his hand up at any point for a delayed call. The linesmen then allows Detroit the opportunity to enter the zone and make a play at which point 9 seconds after the line change started he calls the play dead and issues a penalty only after Calgary is advancing up the ice.

Do you not see an issue with that? Either blow the call dead when it occurs or let the play continue.. you can’t decide it’s a penalty 9 seconds later and only after allowing the opponent a free zone entry and potential scoring opportunity.
HighLifeMan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to HighLifeMan For This Useful Post:
Old 11-27-2024, 10:04 PM   #77
Junglist
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David View Post
You should.
No, you should.

Read the post above mine to understand basic hockey knowledge.
Junglist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2024, 10:04 PM   #78
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

Just finished the game on a delay.

Haven't read a single comment, and I don't know how anyone else feels, but that was one of the worst officiated games I've seen in a very long time.

Flames didn't play their best game, but they got jobbed by the refs in this one. I couldn't believe how easily they called penalties on obvious dives or guys just falling/dropping their sticks. Questionable calls on every single penalty call tonight, going both ways, except for the obvious Larkin faceoff penalty that the referee missed and had to be called by the linesman.

Who ever that ref was, they are ####ing terrible at their job.

Flames got a point, but that game was hard to watch for multiple reasons.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Cali Panthers Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cali Panthers Fan For This Useful Post:
Old 11-27-2024, 10:07 PM   #79
Johnny Makarov
Franchise Player
 
Johnny Makarov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Exp:
Default

man. all this ref whining is so off putting.

Just accept the fact the NHL is a 3rd tier sports league and that officiating is one of the major reasons why.
__________________
Peter12 "I'm no Trump fan but he is smarter than most if not everyone in this thread. ”
Johnny Makarov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2024, 10:11 PM   #80
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HighLifeMan View Post
Talbot plays the puck at 2:05 (when this screen grab occurs and the change begins). Keep in mind The linesman does not put his hand up at any point for a delayed call. The linesmen then allows Detroit the opportunity to enter the zone and make a play at which point 9 seconds after the line change started he calls the play dead and issues a penalty only after Calgary is advancing up the ice.

Do you not see an issue with that? Either blow the call dead when it occurs or let the play continue.. you can’t decide it’s a penalty 9 seconds later and only after allowing the opponent a free zone entry and potential scoring opportunity.
This is true...if the linesman is calling the offside is he really able to delay it 9 seconds? Like a ref would have his hand up the entire time. If it was a delayed penalty Talbot would have gone to the bench.

Also in that screenshot the two Flames coming on are basically touching the bench...maybe a few seconds later is more convincing but I can show you screenshots of 10 players touching the ice on a line change.
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
edmonton is no good


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:41 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy