Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-24-2024, 10:47 AM   #721
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Junglist View Post
How many times have you been banned?

Calm down.
Zero. I self banned my account years ago to take a break, that's it. Look at the join date Einstein.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 10-24-2024, 10:51 AM   #722
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Psytic View Post
A top-4 RD in his prime at $4.5 million (Rasmus) I feel like they would need to add a 1st or something to Iginla personally. Isn't it usually a 1st rounder and blue chip prospect for these kinds of players.
Name a "blue chip" prospect that has been moved for a rental? Plus a 1st round pick?

I guess the definition of "blue chip" can differ.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 10:52 AM   #723
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
Name a "blue chip" prospect that has been moved for a rental? Plus a 1st round pick?

I guess the definition of "blue chip" can differ.
Well that's where the problem is - Flames shouldn't be waiting until Andersson is a rental to move him if they want to get their best value for him.

If they think re-signing him is going to be tough / he's not open to re-signing then he should be moved before this trade deadline.

Gives the acquiring team at least two playoff runs with him, and generally a better opportunity to extend him. Doesn't mean you're getting a recent top 10 pick...but gives you a much better chance at a blue chip prospect / maximizing value.

Last edited by SuperMatt18; 10-24-2024 at 10:57 AM.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 10:58 AM   #724
YyjFlames
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
Name a "blue chip" prospect that has been moved for a rental? Plus a 1st round pick?

I guess the definition of "blue chip" can differ.
Typically only happens when the traded player is going to resign with the club that trades for him. Mark Stone comes to mind... he returned Eric Branstrom, who at the time was one of the best defensive prospects in the NHL. Seemed like a huge return for a rental, even one who would extend with the receiving club.
YyjFlames is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 11:00 AM   #725
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YyjFlames View Post
I can't see Andersson being traded this year, with the way that he's playing and how he's embraced his leadership responsibility. He's also having fun playing hockey, which is a big part of the culture that Conroy and Huska are working to instill in the younger players.

He's here long term unless the Flames fall off a cliff this year or next year he says he doesn't want to re-sign.

That's been Conroy's pattern with the core veterans. It's up to them on whether they get moved.
Yeah, unless it is a massive haul that spoils the Flames with riches, I don't see the hurry to trade Andersson who still has another year with a reasonable cap hit. Conroy can definitely be patient here.

Maybe not a popular opinion, but I wouldn't be against just keeping him and extending him next summer if he is willing to stay. The Flames senior leadership group isn't getting younger and Andersson could provide some leadership continuity as the older guys age out of the league. Obviously Andersson's willingness to stay, contract term, and cap hit all play into it too. I'm just saying he isn't a player that needs to be traded at all costs and could be part of the long term solution still.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."

Last edited by FlamesAddiction; 10-24-2024 at 11:21 AM.
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
Old 10-24-2024, 11:01 AM   #726
Psytic
First Line Centre
 
Psytic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

He's not UFA until 2026. A team chasing the cup has two full runs to add a potential Norris D at 4.5 mill. I think it looks pretty enticing depending on how hard other teams ownership groups has the GM in a vice to win. Wouldn't be hard to move him at all if teams are in the hunt after US Thanksgiving.
Psytic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 11:05 AM   #727
All In Good Time
First Line Centre
 
All In Good Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: I'm somewhere where I don't know where I am
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icon View Post
perfect!
yep
another example of people trying to be edgy/controversial/pro hockey scout/mathematical or statistical geniuses. but, ending up coming across as shallow, dim and inexperienced.
All In Good Time is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 11:05 AM   #728
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

LeBrun on insider trading:

https://www.tsn.ca/video/early-tradi...market~3017052

Utah's plan for 2 of their top 4 D men out for months is internal for now but will probably turn to trade if losses mount up
one d-man Armstrong has checked on is Provorov - Blue Jackets not ready to move him yet
Utah prefers finding a rental like Provorov because the injured players are expected to come back at some point this season

Montreal is doing due diligence looking to shake up team
Difficult to do trades this early in the season
Habs won't mortgage the future
Habs are at cap so must be equal $ in and $ out
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 10-24-2024, 11:09 AM   #729
Tbull8
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

Dach to the Flames wouldnt be a terrible gamble to make imo
Tbull8 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 11:14 AM   #730
BigThief
First Line Centre
 
BigThief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbull8 View Post
Dach to the Flames wouldnt be a terrible gamble to make imo
If the price is low, Dach doesn't exactly inspire confidence at this point and Montreal has him playing on the wing
__________________
MMF is the tough as nails cop that "plays by his own rules". The force keeps suspending him when he crosses the line but he keeps coming back and then cracks a big case.
-JiriHrdina
BigThief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 11:17 AM   #731
HighLifeMan
First Line Centre
 
HighLifeMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Exp:
Default

I'd stay away from Dach.

Consistently bad underlaying numbers.
Made of glass / always hurt.
Proven himself not capable of playing C at the NHL level.
Won't come cheap solely due to the acquisition cost the Habs paid to acquire him.
HighLifeMan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to HighLifeMan For This Useful Post:
Old 10-24-2024, 11:19 AM   #732
traptor
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

I wonder about Detroit as a trade partner.

.
They have larkin, copp, compher and now Kasper up the middle. They also have youngish centers like Rasmussen and Veleno. Then they also have Danielson

They could use another top 4 RD. They could use a younger goalie with some upside.

I wouldn't mind Danielson as a key piece in an Andersson trade.
Rasmussen or Veleno might also be a good buy cheap option.
traptor is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to traptor For This Useful Post:
Old 10-24-2024, 11:24 AM   #733
Tbull8
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by traptor View Post
I wonder about Detroit as a trade partner.

.
They have larkin, copp, compher and now Kasper up the middle. They also have youngish centers like Rasmussen and Veleno. Then they also have Danielson

They could use another top 4 RD. They could use a younger goalie with some upside.

I wouldn't mind Danielson as a key piece in an Andersson trade.
Rasmussen or Veleno might also be a good buy cheap option.
Danielson would be a dream. Loved him in his draft year
Tbull8 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tbull8 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-24-2024, 11:25 AM   #734
Canada 02
Franchise Player
 
Canada 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
LeBrun on insider trading:

https://www.tsn.ca/video/early-tradi...market~3017052

Utah's plan for 2 of their top 4 D men out for months is internal for now but will probably turn to trade if losses mount up
one d-man Armstrong has checked on is Provorov - Blue Jackets not ready to move him yet
Utah prefers finding a rental like Provorov because the injured players are expected to come back at some point this season

Montreal is doing due diligence looking to shake up team
Difficult to do trades this early in the season
Habs won't mortgage the future
Habs are at cap so must be equal $ in and $ out
youtube link for those of us who are geo-blocked

Canada 02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 11:51 AM   #735
genetic_phreek
First Line Centre
 
genetic_phreek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: VanCity
Exp:
Default

Dach is overrated IMO. He's a former top 3 pick, young, and is big, but he doesn't play big, injury prone, and his skating is average at best. I hope we stay away.
genetic_phreek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 12:03 PM   #736
Junglist
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Exp:
Default

Dach and Cozens shouldn’t be on the Flames radar at all, loser players from losing teams.
Junglist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 12:07 PM   #737
boogerz
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Junglist View Post
Dach and Cozens shouldn’t be on the Flames radar at all, loser players from losing teams.

Cozens can be saved. One seasons removed from 30-goals and he's been lighting up the world championships the past two seasons.

He should absolutely be on the Flames' radar
boogerz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to boogerz For This Useful Post:
Old 10-24-2024, 12:13 PM   #738
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbull8 View Post
Danielson would be a dream. Loved him in his draft year
Agreed. My top targets in the league for young prospects in an Andersson trade would be Iginla, Danielson, Ritchie and Helenius. Of course, there are other top centre prospects that are better than some of those players (Catton for example)… I just hope one of these four players could potentially be available because their teams will have some level of desperation. I think Utah, Detroit and Buffalo are “desperate” to make the playoffs. And I think Colorado is in the phase of doing anything necessary to keep winning cups in their window. Seattle (who has Catton) on the other hand is not as desperate IMO.

In some ways, these other teams need help now more than they need help 2-3 years from now when those prospects could become impact players in the NHL. Highly doubtful these prospects will be available though. They are such valuable prospects that it’s probably a non-starter - even in an Andersson trade.
stemit14 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 12:19 PM   #739
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14 View Post
Agreed. My top targets in the league for young prospects in an Andersson trade would be Iginla, Danielson, Ritchie and Helenius.
Not that I want to see Andersson traded, but getting Tij under any circumstance would be amazing. I just can't see Utah trading him though. Looking at the way they were promoting him after the draft, they seem to be grooming him as the future face of the franchise. I think they see a lot of marketability with him.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 12:22 PM   #740
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
Not that I want to see Andersson traded, but getting Tij under any circumstance would be amazing. I just can't see Utah trading him though. Looking at the way they were promoting him after the draft, they seem to be grooming him as the future face of the franchise. I think they see a lot of marketability with him.
Yeah. It would be a dream scenario. That ownership couple seems to really value their image and marketability too which probably makes Tij even more of an untouchable.

Last edited by stemit14; 10-24-2024 at 03:57 PM.
stemit14 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:56 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy