|
View Poll Results: Waiver Result?
|
|
Pelletier and Cooley both clear
|
   
|
211 |
57.34% |
|
Pelletier clears and Cooley is claimed
|
  
|
18 |
4.89% |
|
Cooley clears and Pelleiter is claimed
|
  
|
110 |
29.89% |
|
Pelletier and Cooley both get taken
|
  
|
29 |
7.88% |
10-06-2024, 01:20 PM
|
#141
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by looooob
yeah that's interesting- but would you have kept him up? 3 goalie things are always weird
there was still an easy path to it if they choose- sorry Hanley I'm looking in your direction again...
|
I bet you Conroy realizes now he added way too many defensemen between last year and today, via waivers, trades, etc.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to activeStick For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-06-2024, 01:20 PM
|
#142
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Calgary
|
9 goalies on waivers today. Doubtful that Cooley gets claimed and Twitter user cmpdave who has broke info before said that Cooley's camp does not expect to get claimed and the 2nd year on his contract was to help dissuade a waivers claim
*edit AC beat me to it
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2024, 01:21 PM
|
#143
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 110
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
...then they would waive them at a time when they are most confident that they will clear. Is that day today?
|
A day when almost 70 players are put on waivers seems like the right day.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FurnaceFace For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-06-2024, 01:22 PM
|
#144
|
|
Scoring Winger
|
Good guy is not good at hockey.
Oh well.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Dan403 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-06-2024, 01:23 PM
|
#145
|
|
Scoring Winger
|
I think part of having too many defence is that the younger players performed better than expected. So, they didn’t need as many veterans and we can probably expect a few to be cleared out as the season moves along.
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2024, 01:23 PM
|
#146
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buff
Once
|
I'm ok with someone calling him a PPG AHL player- he essentially is (.93 or something)
its also ok then to call him a .25 or whatever he is NHL player
not sure where this ends up for the guy, but he he has done well in the AHL (which is often necessary but not sufficient to succeed in the NHL- see...well lots--Phillips, Czarnik etc etc)
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2024, 01:27 PM
|
#147
|
|
Fearmongerer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts
He is PPg in the AHL
|
Which means nothing in regards to staying in the NHL or not.
Weird flex by that guy to include it as a "reason".
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-06-2024, 01:27 PM
|
#148
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Jakob Pelletier is small, not especially fast, and not overly skilled.
In a summer where we have a dozen players making noteworthy impressions in prospect camp, Penticton and pre season, Pelletier continued to do very little to distinguish himself.
This is par for the course with Pelletier. Since he was drafted in 2019, what is your signature Jakub Pelletier moment?
He has 4 goals in 37 games.
Those are the numbers of someone who has never, to my eyes, looked dangerous at the NHL level.
It’s not personal. He seems like a great kid.
He’s not an NHLer - he’s too small to be a grinder and he’s not skilled enough for the top 6.
It is what it is.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-06-2024, 01:29 PM
|
#149
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Even if Pelletier is claimed does anyone really think he'll stick? we could claim him back later.
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2024, 01:30 PM
|
#150
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
|
Forgot about cooley's second year.
Pretty safe waive. And if he goes anywhere it's probably as a placeholder and he winds up back on waivers later.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2024, 01:31 PM
|
#151
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by looooob
yeah that's interesting- but would you have kept him up? 3 goalie things are always weird
there was still an easy path to it if they choose- sorry Hanley I'm looking in your direction again...
|
No just hoping he clears
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2024, 01:32 PM
|
#152
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snuffleupagus
Even if Pelletier is claimed does anyone really think he'll stick? we could claim him back later.
|
I don't see him Byron-ing anywhere.
He's working his way back from a year of mending from injuries. At best he doesn't look out of place in someone's bottom six, and we already have several guys that fit that description.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2024, 01:32 PM
|
#153
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: I'm somewhere where I don't know where I am
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snuffleupagus
Even if Pelletier is claimed does anyone really think he'll stick? we could claim him back later.
|
It’s important to remember this, if he’s claimed, he needs to stay on the NHL roster.
He wasn’t good enough here.
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2024, 01:34 PM
|
#154
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
A question to anyone who has a better handle on the other teams than I do... - Which teams have roster holes that Pelletier or Cooley could fill?
- Are there any other players on waivers today who could better fill those holes?
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2024, 01:34 PM
|
#155
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario
|
Quote:
|
It’s important to remember this, if he’s claimed, he needs to stay on the NHL roster.
|
No, he doesn't. He just needs to be waived again to be sent down.
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2024, 01:35 PM
|
#156
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: I'm somewhere where I don't know where I am
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ped
No, he doesn't. He just needs to be waived again to be sent down.
|
Well yes that’s obvious
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2024, 01:37 PM
|
#157
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak
A question to anyone who has a better handle on the other teams than I do... - Which teams have roster holes that Pelletier or Cooley could fill?
- Are there any other players on waivers today who could better fill those holes?
|
Washington and the two Florida teams are the only ones that jump out as being able to use a player like Pelletier.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2024, 01:37 PM
|
#158
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario
|
Sorry, when you said he "needs to stay on the NHL" roster I didn't realize you actually meant "no he doesn't need to, but he does need to be waived again to be sent down."
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2024, 01:38 PM
|
#159
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ped
No, he doesn't. He just needs to be waived again to be sent down.
|
If he is waived again, then the Flames can make the claim and put him directly on the wranglers.
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2024, 01:43 PM
|
#160
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Why is no one up in arms about Schwindt going on waivers or Cooley. I see them as being better fits than Pelletier. Especially Cooley with our goalie situation. We have a ton of young wingers and defensemen
We need centers and potentially a goalie.
Last edited by Goriders; 10-06-2024 at 01:45 PM.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:25 PM.
|
|
