Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum > Tech Talk
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-15-2024, 10:06 AM   #2061
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

BC has tax credits and higher gas taxes, so it makes more sense there.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2024, 11:40 AM   #2062
Cappy
#1 Goaltender
 
Cappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
Was in Vancouver for a quick work trip on Tuesday - its crazy to see how many EVs are driving around.

You basically can't drive a block with seeing a tesla.

But, just in a short amount of driving, I saw:

Chevy Bolt (and possibly EV Blazer/equinox?)
Hummer EV
Hyundai (Kona, Ioniq 5 & 6)
Kia (EV6 & EV9)
Vinfast
Rivian
Toyota BZ4x
Mercedes EQe(I think)
Nissan Leaf
VW ID.4
Ford (MAch E & Lightning)
Likely some Volvo/ BMW / Audi (harder to spot)
Probably Polestar
possibly Fiskar?

So many.
I was in LA a month ago, and was blown away by the amount of electric vehicles I saw there - and of all types. Also, 80% of our Uber's were electric.
Cappy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2024, 11:52 AM   #2063
Lubicon
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
BC has tax credits and higher gas taxes, so it makes more sense there.
Climate is a little more conducive to EV's as well, it doesn't get as cold in winter. Driving distances are generally less in the lower mainland as well, range may not be as much as an issue.
Lubicon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2024, 01:13 PM   #2064
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lubicon View Post
Climate is a little more conducive to EV's as well, it doesn't get as cold in winter. Driving distances are generally less in the lower mainland as well, range may not be as much as an issue.
And for years, EVs have run on smug, which their is no shortage of out there.

Last edited by Fuzz; 08-17-2024 at 10:02 AM.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
Old 08-15-2024, 01:51 PM   #2065
DoubleK
Franchise Player
 
DoubleK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA/Scottsdale, AZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cappy View Post
I was in LA a month ago, and was blown away by the amount of electric vehicles I saw there - and of all types. Also, 80% of our Uber's were electric.
I have noticed the same thing in Seattle.
__________________
It's only game. Why you heff to be mad?
DoubleK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2024, 09:55 AM   #2066
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
BC has tax credits and higher gas taxes, so it makes more sense there.
Yup.

For my F150 lightning:

For a gas version, at 12L/100km and $1.79/L it's $21.48 to drive 100km

My real world numbers, at 31kWh/100km and $0.10/kWh it's $3.10 to drive 100km

No tax credit, but up to $4k off a new EV (if you make less than 80k/yr) on top of the $5k federal rebate makes it almost a no brainer
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Street Pharmacist For This Useful Post:
Old 08-17-2024, 10:04 AM   #2067
Sylvanfan
Appealing my suspension
 
Sylvanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
No tax credit, but up to $4k off a new EV (if you make less than 80k/yr) on top of the $5k federal rebate makes it almost a no brainer
If you are making less than 80k a year nowadays you should not be thinking of buying a new car.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
Sylvanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Sylvanfan For This Useful Post:
Old 08-17-2024, 10:08 AM   #2068
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylvanfan View Post
If you are making less than 80k a year nowadays you should not be thinking of buying a new car.
Agreed. The complaints on EVs here were "only the rich can afford them, why are we subsidizing them? We need subsidies for those making less than 80k!"

I'm thinking "no, they buy used cars which will soon be available". And lo and behold, there's a thriving used EV market
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2024, 11:22 AM   #2069
Sylvanfan
Appealing my suspension
 
Sylvanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
Agreed. The complaints on EVs here were "only the rich can afford them, why are we subsidizing them? We need subsidies for those making less than 80k!"

I'm thinking "no, they buy used cars which will soon be available". And lo and behold, there's a thriving used EV market
They would be better off subsidizing the financing for people in the sub 80k range to buy used ones. With lower income levels saving is difficult because basic living eats up more of your income. Someone making 100k can live like a pauper and save. The person making 75 just doesn't have the money to save. But if there were advantageous finance rates to buy an EV over another type used, I think that could entice more people to look that way. Now they're looking to save on the energy to use it, plus possibly a lower payment.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
Sylvanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sylvanfan For This Useful Post:
Old 08-18-2024, 08:35 AM   #2070
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylvanfan View Post
They would be better off subsidizing the financing for people in the sub 80k range to buy used ones. With lower income levels saving is difficult because basic living eats up more of your income. Someone making 100k can live like a pauper and save. The person making 75 just doesn't have the money to save. But if there were advantageous finance rates to buy an EV over another type used, I think that could entice more people to look that way. Now they're looking to save on the energy to use it, plus possibly a lower payment.
Even that misses the boat though. The point of subsidizing is to increase electric vehicle uptake because that will increase infrastructure, normalize a new technology, and lower prices naturally due to scale. Why do we care which demographic buys them? Stimulating used EV sales does little to advance any of this
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Street Pharmacist For This Useful Post:
Old 08-18-2024, 10:57 AM   #2071
Sylvanfan
Appealing my suspension
 
Sylvanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
Even that misses the boat though. The point of subsidizing is to increase electric vehicle uptake because that will increase infrastructure, normalize a new technology, and lower prices naturally due to scale. Why do we care which demographic buys them? Stimulating used EV sales does little to advance any of this
On its own it won't do much. But what does giving people a discount on something they can't afford accomplish?

Right now the depreciation on EV's is something that is of concern. Than factor in the original price which is out of reach for like me and maybe 5 other people on Calgarypuck but outside of that 75% of the real world in this country can afford. So a better market for used ones to alleviate some of the depreciation might result in you rich guys cycling through them a bit quicker do lowlifes like me have more used ones. If it keeps them on the road and gets the used market using them more in theory that should boost infrastructure and the like.

That said some type of subsidized battery replacement insurance program that helps take away the my car is worthless and too expensive to fix might be more effective. I don't know...if I was a good thinker, I probably wouldn't be a bottom of the barrel lowlife!
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
Sylvanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2024, 01:16 PM   #2072
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylvanfan View Post
On its own it won't do much. But what does giving people a discount on something they can't afford accomplish?
It floods the market with used inventory, which drops used prices.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylvanfan View Post
Right now the depreciation on EV's is something that is of concern.
Yup, so just make the incentives big enough that people won't care. Like property in a flood zone (for the 2 years people remember the flood for after).

I think it's way more efficient to administer subsidies on the new stuff, and vehicles truly do "trickle down" and all the rich guys turn them over like underwear.
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2024, 07:32 PM   #2073
Calgary
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
Yup.

For my F150 lightning:

For a gas version, at 12L/100km and $1.79/L it's $21.48 to drive 100km

My real world numbers, at 31kWh/100km and $0.10/kWh it's $3.10 to drive 100km

No tax credit, but up to $4k off a new EV (if you make less than 80k/yr) on top of the $5k federal rebate makes it almost a no brainer
Pretty eyeopening figures. Thanks for sharing.
Calgary is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Calgary For This Useful Post:
Old 08-18-2024, 07:36 PM   #2074
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylvanfan View Post
On its own it won't do much. But what does giving people a discount on something they can't afford accomplish?



Right now the depreciation on EV's is something that is of concern. Than factor in the original price which is out of reach for like me and maybe 5 other people on Calgarypuck but outside of that 75% of the real world in this country can afford. So a better market for used ones to alleviate some of the depreciation might result in you rich guys cycling through them a bit quicker do lowlifes like me have more used ones. If it keeps them on the road and gets the used market using them more in theory that should boost infrastructure and the like.



That said some type of subsidized battery replacement insurance program that helps take away the my car is worthless and too expensive to fix might be more effective. I don't know...if I was a good thinker, I probably wouldn't be a bottom of the barrel lowlife!
I'm not suggesting incentivizing expensive purchases for the upper middle class is fair, just saying that's the most direct way to increase uptake. But before we go too far down that argument, it's worth noting that the average price of a new EV is only 10% higher than that of a combustion vehicle. It's the wealthy that buy all new vehicles, not just EVs.
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2024, 11:50 AM   #2075
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary View Post
Pretty eyeopening figures. Thanks for sharing.
to add to that math:

Difference of $18.38 per 100 km of driving.

If someone averages driving 500km a week, that's a savings of $92 a week, or $4800 a year. plus the cost of a couple oil changes saved as well.
__________________
My LinkedIn Profile.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to You Need a Thneed For This Useful Post:
Old 08-20-2024, 11:18 AM   #2076
Lubicon
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
to add to that math:

Difference of $18.38 per 100 km of driving.

If someone averages driving 500km a week, that's a savings of $92 a week, or $4800 a year. plus the cost of a couple oil changes saved as well.
Why are people so reluctant to purchase EV's if the payout is this quick? I've always wondered this.
Lubicon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2024, 11:49 AM   #2077
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Do many people drive one vehicle 25,000 km a year? The average is ~15,000km. And those savings are for a pickup truck, a smaller efficient gas car will see less savings.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2024, 12:01 PM   #2078
TorqueDog
Franchise Player
 
TorqueDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary - Centre West
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lubicon View Post
Why are people so reluctant to purchase EV's if the payout is this quick? I've always wondered this.
Lifestyle. One barrier right off the bat is not having anywhere convenient to plug in.

If you live in a house or in a multi-family dwelling with outdoor parking that has block heater plug-ins, then at the very least you have (slow) level 1 charging. But if you rely on zoned street parking, or are in a multi-story dwelling with an underground parking garage, it's pretty likely that you don't have access to charging infrastructure at home.
__________________
-James
GO
FLAMES GO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Typical dumb take.
TorqueDog is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TorqueDog For This Useful Post:
Old 08-20-2024, 12:09 PM   #2079
DoubleK
Franchise Player
 
DoubleK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA/Scottsdale, AZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
to add to that math:

Difference of $18.38 per 100 km of driving.

If someone averages driving 500km a week, that's a savings of $92 a week, or $4800 a year. plus the cost of a couple oil changes saved as well.
You'll burn through the oil change savings on a bigger tire budget vs an ICE vehicle and then some.
__________________
It's only game. Why you heff to be mad?
DoubleK is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DoubleK For This Useful Post:
Old 08-20-2024, 03:57 PM   #2080
Cappy
#1 Goaltender
 
Cappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lubicon View Post
Why are people so reluctant to purchase EV's if the payout is this quick? I've always wondered this.
What if i have to drive to Saskatoon last minute, and our other ICE vehicle is in the shop?!?!?!
Cappy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:13 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy