Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Reaction to the trade?
Hate it 3 0.51%
Dislike it 11 1.87%
Whelmed 161 27.38%
Like it 350 59.52%
Love it 63 10.71%
Voters: 588. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-26-2024, 08:30 AM   #1241
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesgod View Post
Why did you say get rid of? Boston is taking on 4 years of Korpisalo, with some retention by Ottawa, get a weaker prospect and a 1st. Flames clearly made out better then Boston did.
Yeah, if Calgary had had to absorb a contract, it’s closer. But they don’t. Every aspect of the trade is better.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 09:14 AM   #1242
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
No idea, I just heard their offer was better than what we got. So maybe?
There is no way that Conroy turns down a better deal because of politics. No way.

I suspect that if TO's offer included a 1st, that it also included a cap dump (how else could TO bring on Markstrom?)

Will TOR fans think their offer is better? Of course - every fan base overvalues their own assets. But Conroy is taking the package he thinks is best for Markstrom. Every time. Edmonton excluded, of course.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2024, 09:19 AM   #1243
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Conroy must like Bahl a lot, Toronto's offer included their 2024 1st.
I think I'd rather have NJ's 2025 (or potentially 2026). Bit more potential upside with those picks I wager. and I like the idea of spreading the premium picks out some (easier cap and roster management down the road)
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Parallex For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2024, 09:22 AM   #1244
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
There is no way that Conroy turns down a better deal because of politics. No way.

I suspect that if TO's offer included a 1st, that it also included a cap dump (how else could TO bring on Markstrom?)

Will TOR fans think their offer is better? Of course - every fan base overvalues their own assets. But Conroy is taking the package he thinks is best for Markstrom. Every time. Edmonton excluded, of course.
Yeah, I could see if the deals were equivalent then Conroy would go with New Jersey's over Toronto. Liljegren is probably the closest thing to Bahl and I don't mind the gamble that Jersey ends up being in the 15-20 range
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 09:29 AM   #1245
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
Yeah, I could see if the deals were equivalent then Conroy would go with New Jersey's over Toronto. Liljegren is probably the closest thing to Bahl and I don't mind the gamble that Jersey ends up being in the 15-20 range
100% you take NJ's draft pick. They had a great year in 2022/23, but were a lottery team for the 4 years before that and finished below .500 this last year.

The Maple Leafs have been a top regular season team for 8 years running. The Maple Leafs 2025 pick is likely 25-30. That New Jersey pick is likely in the 15-25 range, but could be a top 10 pick.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 09:34 AM   #1246
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

We don't know if Liljegren was offered. But let's assume he was for the sake of argument. Why would TOR include him? Because he is an RFA and may be wanting more money than he is worth. Does he get $3M? Would you rather have Liljegren at $3M or Bahl at $1M?

And again, any TOR deal has to include a cap dump.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 09:45 AM   #1247
Icon
Franchise Player
 
Icon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
And again, any TOR deal has to include a cap dump.
Problem there is I'm not certain what the cap dump is from Toronto.

Safe to say it wouldn't have been any of their big names. After Matthews, Nylander, Tavares, Marner, Rielly, nobody else makes more than $2.4mil/yr.

None of these guys are really paid enough to make enough of a difference:
Kampf, 29yr old @ $2.4mil for 3 more seasons?
Jarnkrok, 32yr old @ $2.1mil for 2 more seasons?
Reaves, 37yr old @ $1.35mil for 2 more seasons?
McCabe, 30yr old @ $2.0mil for 1 more season?

I'm guessing the retain on Markstrom was likely 50% instead of 31.25% to make it work instead.

Markstrom (50% retained)
for
2024 1st (#23), Reaves?

Don't think I have any interest in that, would have had to have included another sweetener (Liljegren or a prospect or additional pick?)
Icon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 09:46 AM   #1248
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
There is no way that Conroy turns down a better deal because of politics. No way.

I suspect that if TO's offer included a 1st, that it also included a cap dump (how else could TO bring on Markstrom?)

Will TOR fans think their offer is better? Of course - every fan base overvalues their own assets. But Conroy is taking the package he thinks is best for Markstrom. Every time. Edmonton excluded, of course.
No cap dump from what I heard
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 09:50 AM   #1249
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Here is what they are saying in an Athletic article

Quote:
1. The Leafs were runners-up for Flames netminder Jacob Markstrom last week, losing out to the New Jersey Devils despite having what some might consider a better package of assets on the table. At the very least, they were offering something comparable in a very real bid for the 34-year-old.

In that offer was Toronto’s first-round pick for the coming draft, which shows just how seriously Treliving was pursuing the upgrade in net. (Making trades with the Flames, however, remains complicated by Treliving’s abrupt exit from Calgary last spring.)
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2024, 09:51 AM   #1250
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

My guess is that it's also a major battle with ownership every time Conroy retains on any contract. So coming back to the owners with 31.25% vs 50% is a huge deal.

Also, can someone explain how the signing bonus works. Is the $2.5 owed in signing bonuses paid on July 1 or was it paid when Markstrom signed the contract? This could have been a major issue too, if other teams were not willing to make a deal before July 1.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 09:54 AM   #1251
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

Gotta laugh at BT trying to give away a first rounder already.
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 09:55 AM   #1252
YyjFlames
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
100% you take NJ's draft pick. They had a great year in 2022/23, but were a lottery team for the 4 years before that and finished below .500 this last year.

The Maple Leafs have been a top regular season team for 8 years running. The Maple Leafs 2025 pick is likely 25-30. That New Jersey pick is likely in the 15-25 range, but could be a top 10 pick.
I doubt New Jersey's top 10 protected pick is valued higher than the Maple Leaf's pick this year at 23. At best, it's equal. A healthy New Jersey, with Markstrom, is likely top three in the east next year (New York, maybe Florida or Carolina ahead of them). They had REALLY bad injury luck last year and terrible goaltending.

In saying that, I'm glad Calgary dealt with New Jersey rather than Toronto. I don't want to see the Leafs make a deal with Calgary to address their biggest need.
YyjFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 09:58 AM   #1253
Flames Fan, Ph.D.
#1 Goaltender
 
Flames Fan, Ph.D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Underground
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Here is what they are saying in an Athletic article
Sorry, are you suggesting it was just the first in 24?
Flames Fan, Ph.D. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 10:00 AM   #1254
Icon
Franchise Player
 
Icon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Fan, Ph.D. View Post
Sorry, are you suggesting it was just the first in 24?
The athletic article mentions a "package" so I presume it was that pick and... something.
Icon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Icon For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2024, 10:04 AM   #1255
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icon View Post
Problem there is I'm not certain what the cap dump is from Toronto.

Safe to say it wouldn't have been any of their big names. After Matthews, Nylander, Tavares, Marner, Rielly, nobody else makes more than $2.4mil/yr.

None of these guys are really paid enough to make enough of a difference:
Kampf, 29yr old @ $2.4mil for 3 more seasons?
Jarnkrok, 32yr old @ $2.1mil for 2 more seasons?
Reaves, 37yr old @ $1.35mil for 2 more seasons?
McCabe, 30yr old @ $2.0mil for 1 more season?

I'm guessing the retain on Markstrom was likely 50% instead of 31.25% to make it work instead.

Markstrom (50% retained)
for
2024 1st (#23), Reaves?


Don't think I have any interest in that, would have had to have included another sweetener (Liljegren or a prospect or additional pick?)
That's WAY worse than the NJD deal.

Replace Reaves with Liljegren, and I still like the NJD deal (likely a better pick, less retention, and don't have the uncertainty of Liljegren's new contract)

I don't see how TOR makes a better offer than NJD did. And until someone actually presents one, this is just TOR fans doing TOR fan things.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2024, 10:05 AM   #1256
Fighting Banana Slug
#1 Goaltender
 
Fighting Banana Slug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

TOR 2024 1st with Liljegren might be a little better, but not if the retention is 50%. I am confident Conroy went with the best offer.

(All based on speculation and assumptions. Let's hear more about the proposed deal)
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
Fighting Banana Slug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 10:07 AM   #1257
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Here is what they are saying in an Athletic article
If the source is Treliving himself, we all know he has a long track record of offering low value, and then claiming it was just as good or better than what was taken.

Not bashing Treliving here, but Conroy isn't taking less just to avoid dealing with his old boss.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2024, 10:09 AM   #1258
YyjFlames
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
That's WAY worse than the NJD deal.

Replace Reaves with Liljegren, and I still like the NJD deal (likely a better pick, less retention, and don't have the uncertainty of Liljegren's new contract)

I don't see how TOR makes a better offer than NJD did. And until someone actually presents one, this is just TOR fans doing TOR fan things.
Maybe the 2024 first and Topi Niemelä. That would be pretty close depending on how Calgary's scouts see Bahl and Niemela.
YyjFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 10:15 AM   #1259
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YyjFlames View Post
Maybe the 2024 first and Topi Niemelä. That would be pretty close depending on how Calgary's scouts see Bahl and Niemela.
It would be close, but again, we need to know how much retention is involved. And it isn't better.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2024, 10:17 AM   #1260
Naitix
Scoring Winger
 
Naitix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Exp:
Default

I bet it was Robertson + this years first. I will still take NJ offer
Naitix is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:59 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy