Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-11-2024, 12:00 PM   #101
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

All this says to me is that we are likely headed to another lockout.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 12:40 PM   #102
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CSharp View Post
I'll be surprised to see it changed and here is the reason why. You really haven't seen any of the Canadian teams do it. It's been mainly teams from the US that are doing this because it's a money maker for these teams and it brings out huge news and drives up a frenzy in places where the NHL wants to make inroads to the sports market. Canadian teams don't need to do it because fans are gonna be there for their team no matter what. It's all about money and it goes round and round. Just wait until the Oilers do it and the league will make a ruling out of it and the ownerships in those not-so-NHL areas will threaten to pull out and sell their teams.
That isn't the reason why you have not seen Canadian teams do it. For the Canadian teams and many other teams it makes no financial sense to spend $15M+ dollars on their roster at the deadline, only a handful of really wealthy teams can do that because they have so much capital they don't care. It is like teams in MLB like the Yankees, they don't care how much luxury tax they pay and so it is broken.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 12:44 PM   #103
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C4TPH...h4dmVuNGdsZHR2
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 12:53 PM   #104
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Landeskog could return for Avalanche in Stanley Cup Playoffs

https://www.nhl.com/news/colorado-av...-status-update
Fun, fun. It's a little weird to me to have a salary cap that governs team contruction while trying to make the playoffs, but then throw all it in the garbage once the playoffs start. For teams that routinely make the playoffs, the salary cap has become just a minor inconvenience they have to work around while they wait for their real season to start - cause then they can ice whatever roster they want.

Took about 15 to 20 years after the cap to get back to the wealthy teams using their $$$ to compete, but they've finally figured out how to do it.
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 02:59 PM   #105
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
All this says to me is that we are likely headed to another lockout.
Why? The owners shouldn't care, and the players already gave up on free salaries and agreed to the cap. The fact that it isn't enforced in the playoffs doesn't deny them any money. LTIR actually allows extra contracts to be signed that would otherwise not be allowed.

I think the only people who care are fans.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to butterfly For This Useful Post:
Old 03-11-2024, 03:39 PM   #106
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
Why? The owners shouldn't care, and the players already gave up on free salaries and agreed to the cap. The fact that it isn't enforced in the playoffs doesn't deny them any money. LTIR actually allows extra contracts to be signed that would otherwise not be allowed.

I think the only people who care are fans.
Then why did they put a limit on it in the first place?
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 03:47 PM   #107
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Then why did they put a limit on it in the first place?
A limit on what?
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 04:11 PM   #108
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
a limit on what?
ltir.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 04:12 PM   #109
Shazam
Franchise Player
 
Shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
Exp:
Default

I think it's still the case that players don't get paid in the playoffs, so the thought was that any sort of playoff salary cap would be irrelevant.
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
Shazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 04:15 PM   #110
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
ltir.
Are you talking about the 10-game minimum?

I am not an expert and don't know any more about LTIR than what is here: https://www.capfriendly.com/ltir-faq
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 05:18 PM   #111
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80 View Post
Fun, fun. It's a little weird to me to have a salary cap that governs team contruction while trying to make the playoffs, but then throw all it in the garbage once the playoffs start. For teams that routinely make the playoffs, the salary cap has become just a minor inconvenience they have to work around while they wait for their real season to start - cause then they can ice whatever roster they want.

Took about 15 to 20 years after the cap to get back to the wealthy teams using their $$$ to compete, but they've finally figured out how to do it.
Where is that poster where I said Landeskog would be back for the playoffs and they argued with me that it wouldn't happen?
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 03-11-2024, 05:20 PM   #112
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
Why? The owners shouldn't care, and the players already gave up on free salaries and agreed to the cap. The fact that it isn't enforced in the playoffs doesn't deny them any money. LTIR actually allows extra contracts to be signed that would otherwise not be allowed.

I think the only people who care are fans.
Are you fn kidding? Ya, owners who want to compete for the Cup in smaller markets won't care big money teams can abuse LTIR for a huge competitive advantage, that's it. Do you think before you post some of this stuff?
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 03-11-2024, 05:42 PM   #113
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Do you think teams are happy stashing away key players until the playoffs so they can cheat ?

Vegas is in a battle to make it. I think they would rather have guys in the lineup.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 05:49 PM   #114
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
Do you think teams are happy stashing away key players until the playoffs so they can cheat ?

Vegas is in a battle to make it. I think they would rather have guys in the lineup.
Vegas will be just fine. Do you think teams are happy to have a $25M player advantage come playoffs? Vegas is not in a battle to make it at all, I have a better chance of winning Lotto Max than they do of missing.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 05:52 PM   #115
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Vegas will be just fine. Do you think teams are happy to have a $25M player advantage come playoffs? Vegas is not in a battle to make it at all, I have a better chance of winning Lotto Max than they do of missing.
People were saying that two years ago… and guess what? They missed.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 05:53 PM   #116
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Vegas will be just fine. Do you think teams are happy to have a $25M player advantage come playoffs? Vegas is not in a battle to make it at all, I have a better chance of winning Lotto Max than they do of missing.
Just last week Vegas was in striking distance.

Injuries can pile up.

They are also taking on a lot of risk dealing away picks etc and a chance they could miss the playoffs and not ice the super team you make them out to be.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 06:18 PM   #117
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
Are you talking about the 10-game minimum?

I am not an expert and don't know any more about LTIR than what is here: https://www.capfriendly.com/ltir-faq
No, I’m talking about the SRP Pool. If it’s not an issue, except for fans, why have it? But to your point, why have a minus number of games if it doesn’t matter? Why have a salary cap?
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 06:26 PM   #118
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

Vegas needs to be hit with the retroactive Luongo type cap penalty here for cheating


But not right away that’s not fair. The 2026 season makes sense to me. Penalize them then
neo45 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to neo45 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-11-2024, 06:28 PM   #119
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
No, I’m talking about the SRP Pool. If it’s not an issue, except for fans, why have it? But to your point, why have a minus number of games if it doesn’t matter? Why have a salary cap?
It's like the IL in baseball, to make sure you can't just call up another player to the active roster for a one or two game problem.

I don't know what the SRP pool is, sorry.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 06:37 PM   #120
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Are you fn kidding? Ya, owners who want to compete for the Cup in smaller markets won't care big money teams can abuse LTIR for a huge competitive advantage, that's it. Do you think before you post some of this stuff?
Why are you being so rude? It's actually possible to discuss and differ on these issues without being that way. I suggest you try it.

It is mid-market teams doing it, not "big money teams". https://www.forbes.com/lists/nhl-val...h=43e1bb654109

They are spending $309k of actual salary on Hanifin and $2.07M of actual salary on Hertl. That is not going to break the bank for any NHL franchise outside of the Coyotes.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to butterfly For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:57 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy