03-07-2024, 03:12 PM
|
#1981
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cannon7
Toss in being a regular in a few years? Like when he's 30 years old? Can't wait.
|
I don't think this player is around when it matters (team is back to competing), but I don't think it a hugs stretch that they see something, will give him a chance, and then have an asset to dump in two years at the 2026 trade deadline.
|
|
|
03-07-2024, 03:14 PM
|
#1982
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Slightly right of left of center
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbull8
Its so weird that he didnt get traded as a signed player. If this was the return for a signed Hanifin, oof. But it seems like rental price
|
everyone wants a sign and trade... that has only ever actually happened once.
__________________
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
- Aristotle
|
|
|
03-07-2024, 03:57 PM
|
#1984
|
Franchise Player
|
Seems possible the TB offer was:
2026 1st round pick
2024 3rd round pick (maybe some condition to make it a 2025 2nd rounder)
Some prospect that Flames didn't like as much as the guy they got from Vegas
Some assumptions there obviously but I suspect that is what it came down to.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Strange Brew For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-07-2024, 03:59 PM
|
#1985
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h
|
Context matters here. Except for one trade the lowest grade given was a B. That trade that got the lowest return? The Flames earned a C- for the Tanev trade.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-07-2024, 04:00 PM
|
#1986
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiger
everyone wants a sign and trade... that has only ever actually happened once.
|
Not necessarily a sign and trade, but there was talk of it coming with an extension but then all that talk stopped
|
|
|
03-07-2024, 04:01 PM
|
#1987
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiger
everyone wants a sign and trade... that has only ever actually happened once.
|
It didn't have to be sign and trade. It could have been a deal with a signing by Vegas understood to be in place. There's lots of those (eg Stone).
|
|
|
03-07-2024, 04:05 PM
|
#1988
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: I'm somewhere where I don't know where I am
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbull8
Not necessarily a sign and trade, but there was talk of it coming with an extension but then all that talk stopped
|
Why would Hanifin do this though? He wants to play in Vegas, he can get traded to Vegas. If he signs before the trade, the team he is going to needs to give up more than if he doesn’t and is therefore weaker. Of course he isn’t signing before hand
|
|
|
03-07-2024, 04:29 PM
|
#1989
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by All In Good Time
Why would Hanifin do this though? He wants to play in Vegas, he can get traded to Vegas. If he signs before the trade, the team he is going to needs to give up more than if he doesn’t and is therefore weaker. Of course he isn’t signing before hand
|
Because if the price isn't right he doesn't go to Vegas. Or any other team he wants to sign with.
Why did Stone agree to the terms of an extension before the Vegas trade and sign right after?
|
|
|
03-07-2024, 04:43 PM
|
#1990
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: I'm somewhere where I don't know where I am
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Because if the price isn't right he doesn't go to Vegas. Or any other team he wants to sign with.
Why did Stone agree to the terms of an extension before the Vegas trade and sign right after?
|
But
He went to Vegas
I was responding to the poster who wondered why he didn’t sign before the trade to make the return better for us. And I’m saying, why would he do that to a team he’s going to. He obviously didn’t have to.
|
|
|
03-07-2024, 04:45 PM
|
#1991
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: stuck in BC watching the nucks
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Some discussion about whether all the trades should be looked at in the aggregate or not - of course they should, because that is what matters to the Flames, and will define the team going forward. Also, individual players have different values to different people, so saying this return was good, and that return was bad, is simply a function of your own perceived value of the player.
With respect to this trade, not seeing the reason for hating the conditions - all they mean is that the 1st could turn out to be more valuable.
2024: 20-32.
2025: 10-32
2026: 1-32
I am hoping Vegas exercises the conditions and gives us the 2026 - who wouldn't want the better odds?
And the 3rd can become a 2nd - oh noes!
And Miromanov is a mid-level prospect. Not terrible, by the way, as he has already played NHL games, and will for the Flames, so this isn't a Hanowski situation. Also, Miromanov has a higher PPG in the AHL than Poirier.
But in the end, it comes down to the total return of all the trades:
Toffoli, Zadorov, Lindholm, Tanev and Hanifin --> Sharangovich, Kuzmenko, Miromanov, Grushnikov, Brzustewicz, Jurmo, 1st, 1st, 2nd, 3rd (could become 2nd), 3rd, 3rd, conditional 3rd, 4th (could become 3rd), 5th
The Flames wanted to get younger and rebuild the prospect base. They definitely did that. Knowing they were losing 3 dmen, they wanted to restock the D depth - they did that pretty well(along with the return of Kylington, and the pickups of Pachal and Hanley).
Essentially, the Flames got 2 extra years of draft picks: 2 1sts, a 2nd and a 3rd/possible 2nd, 2 more 3rds, a conditional 3rd and a 4th that can become a 3rd, and a 5th. That all basically equates to 2 years of a 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th.
They also added Brzustewicz, who was a 3rd in last year's draft. So that means that, starting last year, their picks in the top 3 rounds are:
2023: 4 (16, 48, 75, 80)
2024: 5 (10-12, 25-32, 42-46, 50-62, 74-76 + maybe another late 3rd)
2025: 5 (1-32, 11-32, 33-45, 3rd that could be a 2nd, 65-75)
2026: 4 (so far)
If anyone doesn't see that as franchise-altering, I don't know what to say to you. And all of that is on top of already having a middle of the pack prospect list.
Trade Markstrom to a) add to the list, and b) improve the picks we already have, and I give the Flames very high marks for what they've done.
Oh, let's not forget a ton of cap space to add more assets with. As of today, they have 18 contracts for $67M, leaving them with $20M in space. Add Coronato and Kylington, for maybe $3.5M. If they trade Markstrom, either now or in the summer, add another $6M. HUGE opportunities still to come with cap space.
All this has been done while making the on ice product younger and more entertaining.
Hell of a job from Conroy so far, IMO.
|
Out of thanks and you nailed my view perfectly, so thank you.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ResAlien
Let us not befoul this glorious day with talk of the anal gland drippings that are HERO charts.
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jaikorven For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-07-2024, 05:02 PM
|
#1992
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
|
The Flames should collect resumes from CP next time they’re hiring a GM given the amount of people here who think they could do a better job. And with virtually no knowledge of what goes on behind the scenes to boot. We’re lucky to have so many hockey gurus post here.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to N-E-B For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-07-2024, 06:13 PM
|
#1993
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Probably already posted, but Frank defended Conroy on the trade return for Hanifin. He said Hanifin hijacked the trade process and handcuffed the Flames. Frank usually loves to pile on and throw shade on the Flames whenever he can.
Quote:
I know people have been speed-bagging Craig Conroy and the Calgary Flames on social media for the return, they had zero leverage. Noah Hanifin completely and totally hijacked that trade process. Basically any team that had called… and I’m told the Flames had two to three different trades that were nearing the finish line that were scuttled by Hanifin’s camp because invariably the team makes a call to the agent and says ‘Hey we’re thinking about trading for this guy, what are the chances we could get him to sign a contract extension?’ And the answer was always, ‘No, no, he’s not re-signing with you.’
So then you add in the other teams that were in the mix, like Florida, like Tampa, Vegas, obviously on the Hanifin ‘yes list.’ He didn’t have the full no-trade clause but he leveraged it and the process like he did, leaving the Flames to the point where me personally, watching all of this unfold – and if you’ve been listening to me I’ve been telling you for three weeks that they’re not going to get a huge return – getting basically a first and probably a second if Vegas wins a round, which I think we all consider probably pretty likely with the moves that they’re still to make, is a first, a second and an NHL defenceman for no having leverage, is that god-awful?
|
https://flamesnation.ca/news/seraval...-trade-process
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-07-2024, 06:43 PM
|
#1994
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
I am not 100% sure that Hanifin will extend with Vegas. His heart sure seemed set on being in Florida.
|
|
|
03-07-2024, 06:44 PM
|
#1995
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: I'm somewhere where I don't know where I am
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
Probably already posted, but Frank defended Conroy on the trade return for Hanifin. He said Hanifin hijacked the trade process and handcuffed the Flames. Frank usually loves to pile on and throw shade on the Flames whenever he can.
https://flamesnation.ca/news/seraval...-trade-process
|
That all good
And
I too agree that conroy did a good job and deserves credit
I simply don’t agree that Hanifin or his group “handcuffed” anything. In fact, I think this might be the most straightforward/honest hockey transaction in a long time.
As a buyer (any team interested in Hanifin), it’s only prudent to ask the vendor (us) about the likelihood of the product (Hanifin) re-signing.
It’s up to us to grant permission. (If we grant it once or twice, we are foolish to think that the answer won’t be known league wide rather quickly, for various reasons).
In this case, obviously hanifins team let interested parties know the likelihood of them retaining him
AND
WISELY
It appears they are extending the contract after the transaction is done to ensure the new team is as strong as possible
|
|
|
03-07-2024, 06:49 PM
|
#1996
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
Probably already posted, but Frank defended Conroy on the trade return for Hanifin. He said Hanifin hijacked the trade process and handcuffed the Flames. Frank usually loves to pile on and throw shade on the Flames whenever he can.
https://flamesnation.ca/news/seraval...-trade-process
|
Getting annoying how flames keep getting ####ed over by players and agents.
|
|
|
03-07-2024, 07:00 PM
|
#1997
|
Scoring Winger
|
I like the trade! We got a first rounder, a serviceable defensive defence man, and a potential second rounder to boot.
I guess we’re cheering for Vegas in the playoffs!
|
|
|
03-07-2024, 07:01 PM
|
#1998
|
Needs More Cowbell
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
|
|
|
|
03-07-2024, 07:02 PM
|
#1999
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
|
He'd better show up in the playoffs. Vegas isn't going to give him any leeway.
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
|
|
|
03-07-2024, 07:03 PM
|
#2000
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
I am not 100% sure that Hanifin will extend with Vegas. His heart sure seemed set on being in Florida.
|
I hope he doesn't because it will make this trade look a lot better.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:06 AM.
|
|