Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-07-2024, 11:04 AM   #1901
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
What is Friedman getting paid to do PR work for the Flames?
Maybe you should just put him on ignore.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2024, 11:04 AM   #1902
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

d
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevman View Post
I can't help but agree with the other poster that said Calgary's competitive window is likely 2030 or beyond.

If so, the 2026 pick will come in handy.

If it's a high pic, and the player is ready to crack the line up in 2026/27, they'll be up for resigning after the 28/29 season when the Kadri money is available.

If it's a late pic, and the player takes a season or two to mature before cracking the line up, they'll be up for resigning after the 30/31 season when the Huberdeau money is available.

As a bonus, in the off chance Calgary is competitive in 3 years, we'll need the 2026 first rounder on an ELC to help overcome those previously mentioned contracts.

This is going to be a long and bumpy road before the Flames ice anything close to competitive again.
There are always surprises. So much fortune (with picks) plays into it as well as how trades pan out with younger players that I don't think you can nail down any kind of timeline with any certainty.

If we say 2030 though, at least we're giving ourselves runway to be pleasantly surprised along the way.

Take the last rebuild, for example. Feaster arguably did much worse with his tear down trade returns and the team saw playoffs 2 years later.
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2024, 11:05 AM   #1903
Plaedo
Backup Goalie
 
Plaedo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Calaway Park
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald View Post
Still see this as a bad deal, no way to spin it. The fact that Conroy accepted the ridiculous number of conditions is the part that makes this hurt the most. All control in this deal was/is in Vegas' court. For Christ sake, the only pick in this deal that holds no conditions is the one that goes to Philadelphia for retention! Las Vegas still has potential to trade a pick that they have already traded to us. Let that sink in. Conroy gave the Knights the ability to use the very pick he traded "the best available defenseman at the deadline" for to make another deal, which may result in another team getting a better deal than the Flames. I mean, what just happened?

I would have been happy if he came away with solid assets and not conditional ones. Even ones years out like these look they are going to be. The conditions are just batty and joke to be honest. The conditions weaken the Flames position at each turn, which is just poor value when you look at the whole deal. Flames retain, and don't get anything of value. No additional pick nor quality prospect. The primary return are conditional picks where Vegas gets opportunity to leverage those picks for greater return with the Flames receiving anything of value. The "prospect" returned would not make any prospect list of value as the player has already aged out. The "prospect" is 23 weeks younger than the guy he was traded for. That's not a prospect. That's not value. I really don't see how anyone could consider this anything but a terrible return and a young GM being worked over.
I don't disagree with much of what you said. However, I will add my perspective. The way I see it, Conroy is now in the flipping business in the runway leading up to our true contention window. Miromanov could be an easy candidate for a boosted value due to play time and usage and then flip for more assets that better align with our forecasted window.
Plaedo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Plaedo For This Useful Post:
Old 03-07-2024, 11:05 AM   #1904
Igottago
Franchise Player
 
Igottago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

I don't think its unreasonable to think this return seems a little light, given Hanafin was touted all year as a top end D men just hitting his stride (having a career year). Yes, a pending UFA, but a very good player.
However, I'm still on board with what Conroy is doing overall, and I like the overall body of work in terms of asset management.
The risk for the Flames is, yes they've got all these additional assets and picks now, but some of those have to yield players as good or better than the ones that have left the franchise. You don't really want to be constantly trading the best pieces of the deal and not having the returns flourish to the same level. Time will tell.
I do think the Flames are in for a few pretty bad years, so they should get some higher draft picks along the way as well. Feels like the rebuild has officially arrived.
__________________
A few weeks after crashing head-first into the boards (denting his helmet and being unable to move for a little while) following a hit from behind by Bob Errey, the Calgary Flames player explains:

"I was like Christ, lying on my back, with my arms outstretched, crucified"
-- Frank Musil - Early January 1994
Igottago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2024, 11:05 AM   #1905
mrdonkey
Franchise Player
 
mrdonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
Don't you ever get tired of looking at something through a negative lens?
I trust my own judgment enough to not immediately pull a 180 once the details come out and he goes from throw-in to centerpiece, if that's what you mean. He's a 26 year old tweener, which I said from minute one, and that hasn't changed. Stop worrying about what I think, I don't pester you about what you think just because I don't always agree.
mrdonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2024, 11:08 AM   #1906
Wastedyouth
Truculent!
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

Lol. Friedman gains nothing by saying that. Why would he carry water for the Flames management.

The mental gymnastics to dislike the trade is fun to watch.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
It's the Law of E=NG. If there was an Edmonton on Mars, it would stink like Uranus.
Wastedyouth is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Wastedyouth For This Useful Post:
Old 03-07-2024, 11:08 AM   #1907
D as in David
Franchise Player
 
D as in David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
What is Friedman getting paid to do PR work for the Flames?
Favours! You just can't put enough value on those.

/s
D as in David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2024, 11:12 AM   #1908
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdonkey View Post
I trust my own judgment enough to not immediately pull a 180 once the details come out and he goes from throw-in to centerpiece, if that's what you mean. He's a 26 year old tweener, which I said from minute one, and that hasn't changed. Stop worrying about what I think, I don't pester you about what you think just because I don't always agree.
Here's the thing....he isn't just a "throw in".

He obviously was a guy they liked (they have certainly seen him play enough) as evidenced by immediately extending him for 2 years.

Now you, I and others may not agree with what they did or who they targeted, but you can be sure that Conroy and his staff had their convictions about the return and stuck to them. Like every deal ever, time will tell if they were right or not, but in this case they got a guy they clearly feel will be a player for them.

I want them to do that on every single trade ever.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-07-2024, 11:22 AM   #1909
Fan69
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
Here's the thing....he isn't just a "throw in".

He obviously was a guy they liked (they have certainly seen him play enough) as evidenced by immediately extending him for 2 years.

Now you, I and others may not agree with what they did or who they targeted, but you can be sure that Conroy and his staff had their convictions about the return and stuck to them. Like every deal ever, time will tell if they were right or not, but in this case they got a guy they clearly feel will be a player for them.

I want them to do that on every single trade ever.
Agreed on all points would also add that we forget a defencemen prime is 26 and above. With a couple of years of injuries and transition to defence we really may have a diamond in the rough. Nothing wrong with his attitude thats for sure. He has size a shot and skating to his benefit.

Will trust conny on this one if he turns into a solid four thats a huge win.
Fan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2024, 11:22 AM   #1910
Flamescuprun2018
Scoring Winger
 
Flamescuprun2018's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Hopefully it becomes a 2026 lottery pick and a 2nd with the player becoming a Flames regular. This thread would be a great bump at that point.
I have a feeling this gets a bump many times as the three pieces turn this trade into a better and better deal for us...

He is recovering from knee surgery. His NHL numbers reflect such. AHL numbers are excellent. AHL all star.

Buying low again...Conman at work.

May allow Weegar to stay on left side of Andersson pairing as well so. Kylington/Pachal 2nd pair.

He is quite offensively minded so might be more the offensive catalyst on the 3rd pair with Hanley who is defensive minded. Expect him to see some PP time.

Our D might not be as horrible as we expect.
Flamescuprun2018 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2024, 11:25 AM   #1911
Naitix
Scoring Winger
 
Naitix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Exp:
Default

Idk why people are clowning on Conroy for conditions on the first rounder. The 25 and 26 drafts are better and deeper than 24, those picks are more valuable. You also don’t want to have too many first round picks in the same year, there is more of a chance all the guys the scouts liked are gone by the third Flames first round pick and you are picking a guy you could have had in the second round.

Additionally, the conditions are very favourable to the Flames, if Vegas trades 25 pick then we get an UNPROTECTED 26 pick. With Vegas being one of the older teams in the league, with injury history, with no prospects and no picks, there is a good chance they are outside of playoffs in 2026.
Naitix is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Naitix For This Useful Post:
Old 03-07-2024, 11:27 AM   #1912
Macindoc
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamescuprun2018 View Post
I have a feeling this gets a bump many times as the three pieces turn this trade into a better and better deal for us...

He is recovering from knee surgery. His NHL numbers reflect such. AHL numbers are excellent. AHL all star.

Buying low again...Conman at work.

May allow Weegar to stay on left side of Andersson pairing as well so. Kylington/Pachal 2nd pair.

He is quite offensively minded so might be more the offensive catalyst on the 3rd pair with Hanley who is defensive minded. Expect him to see some PP time.

Our D might not be as horrible as we expect.
Can't argue that the Flames are buying low on him, and I will admit that there could be some untapped potential that could work out better than expected.
Macindoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2024, 11:30 AM   #1913
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

If they wind up getting the 2025 1st, I could see it being in the teens.
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2024, 11:40 AM   #1914
kobasew19
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

Plus we get to cheer for a team in the playoffs! Playoff hockey woot!
kobasew19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2024, 11:42 AM   #1915
Salt Water Cowboy #10
Scoring Winger
 
Salt Water Cowboy #10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Sort of related, 27 year old Gustav Forsling just signed his 8 year extension with Florida $46 million. Similar numbers and age to Hanifin. Hanifin was offered way more and still wanted out. Hanifin can beat it. And I’m fine with the return. He’s a whiner not a winner, and a bit over rated here in my books.
Salt Water Cowboy #10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2024, 11:44 AM   #1916
Gaskal
Franchise Player
 
Gaskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrentCrimmIndependent View Post
I'd like to know what people are seeing in Miromanov to make him this sought after d-man.
Tall, still room to fill out, right shot, offensive acumen

Most likely it's Eric Francis blowing smoke though.
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
Gaskal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2024, 11:45 AM   #1917
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaskal View Post
Tall, still room to fill out, right shot, offensive acumen

Most likely it's Eric Francis blowing smoke though.
He's 26. The only filling out he'll be doing would be to get fat.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2024, 11:51 AM   #1918
automaton 3
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Naitix View Post
Idk why people are clowning on Conroy for conditions on the first rounder. The 25 and 26 drafts are better and deeper than 24, those picks are more valuable. You also don’t want to have too many first round picks in the same year, there is more of a chance all the guys the scouts liked are gone by the third Flames first round pick and you are picking a guy you could have had in the second round.

Additionally, the conditions are very favourable to the Flames, if Vegas trades 25 pick then we get an UNPROTECTED 26 pick. With Vegas being one of the older teams in the league, with injury history, with no prospects and no picks, there is a good chance they are outside of playoffs in 2026.
Out of thanks, so thanks! 100% agree.
automaton 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2024, 11:52 AM   #1919
Duffalufagus
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Parkdale
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiggy_12 View Post
That is interesting. Conroy has clearly targeted D-men buried in organizations that are deep at the position. Might be some found money

Pahal
Grushnikov
Miromanov
Dmen buried on depth charts don't typically turn into foundational pieces.
Duffalufagus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2024, 11:53 AM   #1920
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

Flames should have simply asked for more in the deal.
Knut is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:29 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy