Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-06-2024, 04:22 AM   #321
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snuffleupagus View Post
Or Conroy is pinning the two Florida teams against each other
A 26 year old extended #2 dman playing the best hockey of his career should be worth a lot. We’ll see what the return is but the initial one posted here from Tampa seemed underwhelming.
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2024, 04:45 AM   #322
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bax View Post
That doesn’t help Conroy who is trying to turn this team around in a 3-4 year window.
Likely an impossible task.

Which players do they currently have who are likely core players in 3-4 years?
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2024, 05:31 AM   #323
liamenator
First Line Centre
 
liamenator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
Exp:
Default

However this turns out, if the stuff about Brisson is true, it's brutal.

What a grind this year has been for Conroy. It was already tough to have to deal with Tre's, um, legacy. On top of that, the whole league seems to have been trying to squeeze a first-year GM. He's done remarkably well so far.

This may end up being one of those scenarios in which you take a slightly lesser deal from a rental team in order to send a message to Brisson and other agents that this organization won't be strong armed, a la Burke not moving Cammalleri.

From a pure asset management perspective, that didn't make sense. But, looking back and as Burke said at the time, it was an important non-move that reset the perception of the organization around the league.

Last edited by liamenator; 03-06-2024 at 05:41 AM.
liamenator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2024, 06:49 AM   #324
wired
Powerplay Quarterback
 
wired's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Strathmore
Exp:
Default

If the stuff about his agent is true, I would not be opposed to trading him to another team that is not Florida based. If the return from Tampa is underwhelming, then go for a rental team instead. Worth the return to shove it back in their faces.
wired is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2024, 06:53 AM   #325
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Don’t think the rumour is true but if it is it’s a non-starter if that 1st is protected. If the 1st is unprotected it’s an okay / acceptable deal in my mind. It’s literally such small odds that it could end up being a top 5 pick anyway so that’s where the call should start. And it’s fair value for Hanifin, honestly.

If you drafted a Hanifin as a top 5 player you wouldn’t be disappointed. So fair’s fair. People saying they wouldn’t give up an unprotected first, why? Such nonsense. Hanifin has value, they need to pay up appropriately.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2024, 07:04 AM   #326
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wired View Post
If the stuff about his agent is true, I would not be opposed to trading him to another team that is not Florida based. If the return from Tampa is underwhelming, then go for a rental team instead. Worth the return to shove it back in their faces.
The Flames still have to get maximum value - I don't care how. Sour engagements last a few weeks. Draft picks and their subsequent trade trees can last decades.
1qqaaz is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 1qqaaz For This Useful Post:
Old 03-06-2024, 07:09 AM   #327
Flames1217
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Exp:
Default

Today is the day!

Well hopefully at least.....

CPs traffic must be absolutely insane if everyone is checking the site as often as I am lol.
Flames1217 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flames1217 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-06-2024, 07:26 AM   #328
442scotty
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

This is the first year Hanifin decided to show everyone what he could be and surprise surprise it’s a contract year. Please don’t sign in Calgary and turn back into the pumpkin you were. I’ll be surprised if we get a good return for him and oh ya don’t let the door hit you on the way out.
442scotty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2024, 07:30 AM   #329
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bax View Post
That’s a bit of a pipe dream.

I can’t think of a successful rebuild where a team has traded away away any of the first round picks they acquired for established players.

Bottom line is a successful team in Calgary needs to be built through the draft. No more short cuts.

A 2027 draft picks leaves Conroy waiting 7-8 years to see a return on a Hanifin trade. That simply doesn’t hold the same value as a pick in the upcoming draft.
It was exactly a decade ago that we were sellers. Had we gotten a 2017 pick in the top ten for a guy like Cammalleri instead of zilch in the 2014 draft (or a pick in the 20s), it might have turned out to be a name like Elias Pettersson. Imagine adding a piece like that to the 2019 or 2022 Flames teams.

The year of the pick is only on factor - it is where you project the buyer to be sitting in the standings. If a team like Tampa - with aging pieces like Stamkos and Hedman, who have a limited pipeline due to annual rentals - is offering a pick that could fall in the 4-15 range - that could end up being more beneficial than not. All it takes is a Vasilevskiy or Kucherov injury and it could be the Flames' most valuable asset in the next five years
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."

Last edited by GranteedEV; 03-06-2024 at 07:32 AM.
GranteedEV is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
Old 03-06-2024, 07:30 AM   #330
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
Likely an impossible task.

Which players do they currently have who are likely core players in 3-4 years?

I think Wolf has a shot. I wouldn’t be surprised if one of our D prospects emerges as a keeper either and hopefully they draft one this summer and one more next summer.

You’re right though, it’s a tall order. All the more reason to turn your nose at a 2027 pick as the main asset coming back for your top pairing defenseman.
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2024, 07:42 AM   #331
calumniate
Franchise Player
 
calumniate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: A small painted room
Exp:
Default

Trade this bum to winterpeg!
calumniate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2024, 07:46 AM   #332
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

They're on his list lol
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Toonage For This Useful Post:
Old 03-06-2024, 08:19 AM   #333
Wolfman
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Saving the world one gif at a time
Exp:
Default

It's nice to see some considering the dark side of the Hanifin situation. I was starting to wonder if I was the only one.
__________________
Wolfman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wolfman For This Useful Post:
Old 03-06-2024, 08:25 AM   #334
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

This is really starting to remind me of the Iginla situation. If I remember correctly he only wanted to go to Pittsburgh?
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ozy_Flame For This Useful Post:
Old 03-06-2024, 08:26 AM   #335
Wolfman
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Saving the world one gif at a time
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame View Post
This is really starting to remind me of the Iginla situation. If I remember correctly he only wanted to go to Pittsburgh?
That one is a bit different. Iggy was the team and deserved that kind of respect. Hanifin... not so much.
__________________
Wolfman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wolfman For This Useful Post:
Old 03-06-2024, 08:27 AM   #336
Hot_Flatus
#1 Goaltender
 
Hot_Flatus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
Likely an impossible task.

Which players do they currently have who are likely core players in 3-4 years?
Well there's a few candidates between Kadri, Sharangovich, Zary, Weegar, Andersson plus and handful of youngsters currently on the cusp and players coming via trade and draft this year. It's not impossible that Conroy can swing further impact moves this Summer in addition to the deadline that really swing the pendulum towards a young elite talent to build around upfront.

A lot of it is having a solid plan, which the team appears to have now, but a huge part comes down to luck with a top 10-12 pick turning out way better than you'd expect. If the Flames are able to land their own version of Suzuki or Necas in the 10 range this year that pops right away, things start looking a whole lot better in a hurry.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit

Last edited by Hot_Flatus; 03-06-2024 at 08:31 AM.
Hot_Flatus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2024, 08:29 AM   #337
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by liamenator View Post
However this turns out, if the stuff about Brisson is true, it's brutal.

What a grind this year has been for Conroy. It was already tough to have to deal with Tre's, um, legacy. On top of that, the whole league seems to have been trying to squeeze a first-year GM. He's done remarkably well so far.

This may end up being one of those scenarios in which you take a slightly lesser deal from a rental team in order to send a message to Brisson and other agents that this organization won't be strong armed, a la Burke not moving Cammalleri.

From a pure asset management perspective, that didn't make sense. But, looking back and as Burke said at the time, it was an important non-move that reset the perception of the organization around the league.
There’s no conspiracy against Conroy and the Flames. Other GMs aren’t picking on him. Brisson isn’t doing anything the agents for other pending UFAs haven’t done in the past.

Market conditions are working against the Flames. Their big UFA is apparently only willing to sign with a couple teams. Several of the teams in win now mode have previously traded away their 1sts and 2nds. Others are more in need of a RHD than LHD. And the cap crunch makes any deal with significant salary difficult to pull off.

It’s frustrating. But talk about strong-arming and sending signals is off-base. The NHL trade market isn’t as emotional and macho as some fans seem to think. Taking a worse deal to ‘send a signal’ would be foolish. The only signal it would send would that they’re willing to cut off their nose to spite their face. Conroy and the rest of Flames management are smarter than that.

The bigger issue is that NHL players are exercising more control over where they play, and more and more of them don’t want to play in Canada. Fans need to recognize this unwelcome new reality. And Canadian teams need to get their heads around what this means for running their franchises. It probably means making tougher decisions sooner.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.

Last edited by CliffFletcher; 03-06-2024 at 08:36 AM.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
Old 03-06-2024, 08:34 AM   #338
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
There’s no conspiracy against Conroy and the Flames. Other GMs aren’t picking on him. Brisson isn’t doing anything the agents for other pending UFAs haven’t done in the past.

Market conditions are working against the Flames. Their big UFA is apparently only willing to sign with a couple teams. Several of the teams in win now mode have previously traded away their 1sts and 2nds. And several of the others are more in need of a RHD than LHD. The cap crunch makes any deal with significant salary difficult to pull off.

It’s frustrating. But talk about strong-arming and sending signals is off-base. The NHL trade market isn’t as emotional and macho as some fans seem to think. Taking a worse deal to ‘send a signal’ would be foolish. Conroy and the rest of Flames management are smarter than that.
Yup, Flames preferred to sign Hanifin and it didn’t happen. Sounds like they kept trying to re-engage and got rebuffed. They are now down to the wire and trying to send him to a team he will re-sign with to get a better return. He will still get a 1st from someone.
Bonded is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2024, 08:39 AM   #339
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

I say package Hanifin and the Dallas 2nd round pick and grab Sergachev. You get a top two dman and the Lightning recoup some draft capital. Sign and trade where the Lightning probably save some cap space.

Probably a pipe dream but one can hope.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2024, 08:43 AM   #340
Major Major
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
I say package Hanifin and the Dallas 2nd round pick and grab Sergachev. You get a top two dman and the Lightning recoup some draft capital. Sign and trade where the Lightning probably save some cap space.

Probably a pipe dream but one can hope.
Probably?
Major Major is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:41 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy