Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-28-2024, 10:33 PM   #641
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
that may be old - Capfriendly has him at 198 lbs
So, similar size. And styles?
browna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2024, 10:34 PM   #642
Matty81
Franchise Player
 
Matty81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burning Beard View Post
Crazy no GM wanted to pay a first. Healthy Tanev for the last part of the season and playoffs I feel is worth that. Seems GMs are being more stingy with draft pics.

It seems Conroy is slotting for the future finding a very defence first dman to play with the other D prospects who might benefit playing with that type of player. He also gets this trade out of the way so he can focus on Hanifin and any other business.

A defensive dman at his age, it doesn't surprise me too much that no one gave up a 1st. But I expected the flames to get a better prospect or a guatanteed secondary pick when they did settle on a 2nd, especially if you're taking a pick that late, around the 60th slot. surprised they didnt wait. But like I said earlier... at least the flames are making these moves, building up draft capital. Should get one good prospect with that pick.

Maybe it could also allow them to move up a couple slots in the 1st if the team keep trending towards classic flames just miss the playoffs and get a crappy pick territory
Matty81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2024, 10:34 PM   #643
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Next layer of grading on this trade can be done in comparison to what other returns D get before the deadline. Other than for Hanifin, if some other team gets a first for a defenseman this place will fold in on itself.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2024, 10:36 PM   #644
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

My read on why Grushnikov was interesting was all the reports of his defending but he also moves the puck out of the zone very very well. He moves reads plays well and moves things up the ice.

Less time in the D zone = less time you have to defend.

I see and understand the appeal and that's the way they want to build this new roster out tailored to a quick transition game.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond

Last edited by dammage79; 02-28-2024 at 11:07 PM.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2024, 10:37 PM   #645
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reign of Fire View Post
Huh, they retained 50%
Ah ok

The title of the thread, just said 75% via NJ

Thanks for clarifying
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2024, 10:37 PM   #646
kehatch
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DazzlinDino View Post
But you don't know what was available, as Jiri pointed out the market needs, dictates what is being offered. Conroy likely went back to all the GM's to see if they had a better offer until the best one that was there.

Let's say you lived in a small town and they only had one car dealership, you're likely going to pick from what's available. Maybe your selection is limited because of what you can afford.. Conroy has to take the best deal that the market offier's him. There was not a lot of time left plus you don't want your defenseman getting injured. Conway and staff field we got a really good player, let's give him the benefit of the doubt and just see what happens.
The Flames obviously took the best offer they felt was available. But they didn't have to take any offer for 8 days. The Flames control the D market this year. There was minimal pressure to be the first party to swerve.

I think its as simple as Conroy and team like the prospect and didn't feel they had to hold out for another deal. Hopefully they are right.
kehatch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kehatch For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2024, 10:37 PM   #647
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Grushnikov is an interesting target if the Flames really liked him. Not only do I have a lot more faith in this Flames management's scouting, but Dallas also has a fantastic drafting track record in recent years and they chose him pretty high initially (the immediate pick after Stankoven).
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2024, 10:41 PM   #648
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

Devil's advocate — if Dallas is willing to cut bait with Grushnikov without seeing him in the NHL, they might not be thrilled with what they think they had.
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TheScorpion For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2024, 10:42 PM   #649
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by browna View Post
I think part of the D grade is for the fact that Flames didn't wait for or push the price up by waiting another week...as I've said a few times, I think Dallas would still be there in a week looking at Tanev just as seriously.
I think at some point you tell teams, give me your best offer and you have to pull the trigger.

It's a bit easier when you only have one guy to move to risk waiting until the deadline, but when you're moving 4 or 5 guys this year you need to try to give time for the market to build too. Think that's what Conroy has done by trying to space these trades out.

I think part of doing this now is also going "Okay Tanev is gone, now who wants Hanifin" to try and build a bigger rental market there just in case the sign and trade option doesn't work.

Maybe he's right, maybe he's wrong, and if Walker or Seeler get moved for a 1st next week then we know he was wrong. But we have to wait and see now.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
14
Old 02-28-2024, 10:42 PM   #650
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by topfiverecords View Post
Next layer of grading on this trade can be done in comparison to what other returns D get before the deadline. Other than for Hanifin, if some other team gets a first for a defenseman this place will fold in on itself.
Tanev is plug and play. He had no adjustment period coming to the Flames after 9 years in Vancouver. He won't have any adjustment period going to Dallas or anywhere, and teams know that..you know exactly what you're getting in him on and off the ice.

Even Hanifin, as well as he's playing this year you wonder if going to a new team and system and coaching, if it will take him a while to get acclimated to be able to play his offensive style that he's being acquired for and be effective . Maybe it will take time, maybe not.

That's why I think, for playoff teams looking for that rental, that Tanev was so valuable. Give him a hotel room to stay in the next 3 months, a uniform, and forget about him, he'll do the rest. There are a handful of guys like that around the league, not many are available though.
browna is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to browna For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2024, 10:43 PM   #651
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
Devil's advocate — if Dallas is willing to cut bait with Grushnikov without seeing him in the NHL, they might not be thrilled with what they think they had.
Cut bait is strong. Maybe what Conroy said was a sell job but he said Nill wasn't thrilled to add him in the trade
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2024, 10:43 PM   #652
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DazzlinDino View Post
Another good point to consider is how would the Athletic grade the Toffoli trade now?

As Conroy pointed out the player we got in the Toffoli trade needed more opportunity. Something the Athletic couldn't forsee because they weren't looking at the same things from the perspective the Flames were.

It's useless to go by what the Athletic said because they're merely making an observation without likely having spent any time watching the player.
They wrote an article which kind of was a bit of crow eating.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2024, 10:45 PM   #653
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

honestly complaining about picks being late is pretty dumb to be frank
Like did you expect SJ or Chicago to trade for Tanev?
__________________
GFG
dino7c is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2024, 10:45 PM   #654
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

If no team is willing to trade you a first for Chris Tanev, then not much you can do about it. I really doubt the offers get better in a week.

I'm sure lots of teams were offering a second and a prospect. So the trade really comes down to how well the Flames have evaluated Grushnikov. We will get to see how good of a decision that is.

Also turns out Seravalli was right on the mark.

One thing Conroy was adamant about was how valuable the cap savings were from the Zadorov trade. Still waiting to see that play out (as I don't think those savings were needed for Kuzmenko were they?).
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Strange Brew For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2024, 10:46 PM   #655
DazzlinDino
Franchise Player
 
DazzlinDino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Grew up in Calgary now living in USA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
My read on why Groshnikov was interesting was all the reports of his defending but he also moves the puck out of the zone very very well. He moves reads plays well and moves things up the ice.

Less time in the D zone = less time you have to defend.

I see and understand the appeal and that's the way they want to build this new roster out tailored to a quick transition game.
Conroy also said that Groshnikov compliments the defenseman that like to jump into the rush. So it seems to me that the Flames actually have a plan. Treliving used to go out to get shiny pieces, but Conroy and staff are going after team needs on a long term plan. If this player plays as well as Conroy thinks he does, I bet Huska has no problem slotting him in. He seems to work well with our teams defense.

We are getting a young guy who's probably a faster Tanev and already plays a very strong stay home style.

Conroy has surprised us already with some of his moves I don't know why people are questioning this one so quickly. It's nice to see so many people pretty happy about eating crow lately.

Last edited by DazzlinDino; 02-28-2024 at 10:50 PM.
DazzlinDino is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to DazzlinDino For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2024, 10:46 PM   #656
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion View Post
To add to this, the 4 outbound guys have an average age of 31 and a combined cap hit of $17.35M (with all looking for raises next year, other than Tanev)

The 5 players coming in have an average age of under 23 and a combined cap hit of $8.6M (plus the league minimum salaries if/when anyone gets called up.

So, along with getting significantly younger, and acquiring a handful of picks to go along with the young players, they have also gained a ####-ton of cap space, which provides opportunity to either acquire more players or use to acquire even more assets.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2024, 10:47 PM   #657
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

You can add Pachal to that list too, he is only 24 and looks like a player to me
__________________
GFG
dino7c is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2024, 10:49 PM   #658
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
Devil's advocate — if Dallas is willing to cut bait with Grushnikov without seeing him in the NHL, they might not be thrilled with what they think they had.
Flames can say the same thing - if they didn't want to keep Tanev as an internal add, and re-sign him for next year, they might not be thrilled with him any longer.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2024, 10:49 PM   #659
Flames Fan, Ph.D.
#1 Goaltender
 
Flames Fan, Ph.D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Underground
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
This is what a lot of people said when the Flames traded Baertchi for a 2nd - gave him away!

That 2nd (Andersson) has had a fair bit more than 'no impact for the Flames' I would say.
This is the key observation.

It's a message board and we all should have fun with it. But you really can't judge a trade with draft picks in it until you know who those picks are.

Let it play out before getting all hot and bothered about how Conroy left a bunch of free cash on the table.
Flames Fan, Ph.D. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2024, 10:49 PM   #660
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DazzlinDino View Post
Conroy also said that Groshnikov compliments the defenseman that like to jump into the rush. So it seems to me that the Flames actually have a plan. Treliving used to go out to get shiny pieces, but Conroy and staff are going after team needs on a long term plan. If this play a place as well as Conroy thinks he does, I bet Huska has no problem slotting him in. He seems to work well with our teams defense.

We are getting a young guy who's probably a faster Tanev and already plays a very strong stay home style.

Conroy has surprised us already with some of his moves I don't know why people are questioning this one so quickly. It's nice to see so many people pretty happy about eating crow lately.
Which makes sense in terms of transition. He hits players in stride quite well. So if he works with a Shilly or a Weegar, they could really move things up fast.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:22 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy