01-28-2024, 02:32 PM
|
#18381
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kukkudo
Very poorly run teams, I actually believe the current Flames management would do well with a rebuild compared to those teams.
|
There's a very vocal group of posters who think the Flames should do a scorched-earth rebuild, and also think the Flames' management is the worst in the league.
So tell me, why would you assume that the worst management in the league wouldn't massively screw up the rebuild?
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-28-2024, 02:38 PM
|
#18382
|
Ate 100 Treadmills
|
Despite what many say, the Flames actually had a legit rebuild post-Iggy. They had Gaudreau emerge and start to lead the offence. On paper they had all the necessary pieces Rebuilding more would have been detrimental to the team.
What happened to the Flames had nothing to do with management's decision to compete. Monahan fell apart. The team could never achieve in the playoffs. Gaudreau and Tkachuk both wanted out. The team stopped developing their prospects internally. These are what led to the previous failure, not some decision to pull the plug on a rebuild early or striving for mediocrity.
|
|
|
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to blankall For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-28-2024, 02:42 PM
|
#18383
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
|
Quote:
Some teams have high draft picks and don't make the playoffs.
Some teams have high draft picks and make the playoffs.
Therefore, having high draft picks is no way to build a guaranteed playoff team.
|
That's an argument? There is no way to build a guaranteed playoff team, otherwise everybody would be doing it.
Flames have had one top-5 pick ever, I think? Could be wrong. Sometimes they find stars like Fleury and Gaudreau when other teams get scared off by their size.
Hope they get a bunch of 1st rounders the next few years.
|
|
|
01-28-2024, 02:45 PM
|
#18384
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
Despite what many say, the Flames actually had a legit rebuild post-Iggy. They had Gaudreau emerge and start to lead the offence. On paper they had all the necessary pieces Rebuilding more would have been detrimental to the team.
What happened to the Flames had nothing to do with management's decision to compete. Monahan fell apart. The team could never achieve in the playoffs. Gaudreau and Tkachuk both wanted out. The team stopped developing their prospects internally. These are what led to the previous failure, not some decision to pull the plug on a rebuild early or striving for mediocrity.
|
Don't forget Bennett not panning out. If he turned into the player they thought they would be getting I think things would have been totally different for the Flames. That's why it can take some time for rebuilding things to turn things around as when a top 5 pick doesn't work out, it sets the organization back.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-28-2024, 02:45 PM
|
#18385
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random
There's a very vocal group of posters who think the Flames should do a scorched-earth rebuild, and also think the Flames' management is the worst in the league.
So tell me, why would you assume that the worst management in the league wouldn't massively screw up the rebuild?
|
Not everyone who thinks the Flames should rebuild also thinks their management is the worst in the league.
And for those who do, what's the alternative? Let the "worst management in the league" make win now moves and spend money on UFAs? Isn't that what we're seeing the results of now?
|
|
|
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to butterfly For This Useful Post:
|
1qqaaz,
Ashasx,
Calgary4LIfe,
CF84,
gvitaly,
Hackey,
howard_the_duck,
jayswin,
keenan87,
Mass_nerder,
mikephoen,
Redrum,
Royle9,
Winsor_Pilates
|
01-28-2024, 02:51 PM
|
#18386
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba17
Look at Pittsburgh attendance before Mario and before Sid. Look at Chicago attendance for 10 years before Kane. Look at attendance of Colorado after their cups in the 90's until 2010. The only thing that kept those teams in existence, unlike Winnipeg and Quebec, was the fact that the owners were rich.
How have Buffalo, Edmonton, Ottawa, Columbus et al done with all those high picks. Weren't Buffalo and Ottawa two picks to make the playoffs, how about NJ?
|
Edwards has a net worth of $2.7 billion. Allan Markin is worth $2.2 billion. I'm sure the other owners have a few dollars also. Even if they never made another dollar between the two of them and played to an empty building for the next 50 years, they would still have tens of millions left in the bank.
|
|
|
01-28-2024, 02:54 PM
|
#18387
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly
Flames have had one top-5 pick ever, I think? .
|
Yup (Bennett)
They've drafted 6th overall 5 times:
Stillman
Tkaczuk
Fata
Monahan
Tkachuk
|
|
|
01-28-2024, 03:08 PM
|
#18388
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ped
Yup (Bennett)
They've drafted 6th overall 5 times:
Stillman
Tkaczuk
Fata
Monahan
Tkachuk
|
Well, technically Butterfly just said "Flames", not the "Calgary Flames"
Atlanta had the following picks:
Jacques Richard 2nd OA in 1972
Tom Lysiak 2nd OA in 1972
Both good players as well.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to 1qqaaz For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-28-2024, 03:17 PM
|
#18389
|
Ate 100 Treadmills
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
Don't forget Bennett not panning out. If he turned into the player they thought they would be getting I think things would have been totally different for the Flames. That's why it can take some time for rebuilding things to turn things around as when a top 5 pick doesn't work out, it sets the organization back.
|
Agreed.
Looking back on things, if the Flames had had proper coaching or just some better luck, that team looked could have been dynamite now:
Gaudreau-Monahan-Lindholm
Tkachuk-Bennett-Zary
Magiapane-Backlund-Coleman
Pelletier, Coronato, Prospisil, etc..
Hanifin-Tanev
Kylington-Andersson
Markstrom
The failures and the reason we are here now had nothing to do with pulling the plug on a rebuild early. Everything to do with coaching and asset management and just plain bad luck post-rebuild.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to blankall For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-28-2024, 03:31 PM
|
#18390
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tkachukwagon
I’d be happy with a prospect like Zac Jones (D) or Sykora (F) and a second for Lindholm. First rounder in 2024 would be gravy.
|
I am happy you are not our GM.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-28-2024, 03:49 PM
|
#18391
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz
Well, technically Butterfly just said "Flames", not the "Calgary Flames"
Atlanta had the following picks:
Jacques Richard 2nd OA in 1972
Tom Lysiak 2nd OA in 1972
Both good players as well.
|
I wasn't around back then but they couldn't have both been 2nd OA in 1972
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to butterfly For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-28-2024, 03:58 PM
|
#18392
|
Appealing my suspension
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
|
Lysiak was in 73...top pick that year for the Islanders was...Denis Potvin.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Sylvanfan For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-28-2024, 04:18 PM
|
#18393
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
|
I have faith in management's capability to rebuild properly. The team is fine/good at drafting. If Conroy is as good at asset management as he seems to want to be, they'll have a future.
What I have less faith in is ownership's desire to rebuild. The team has been mediocre for about 30 years - circa 1994.
Murray Edwards first joined the Flames ownership group in...1994.
I have faith in the operations. I don't have faith in the directional strategy.
Last edited by 1qqaaz; 01-28-2024 at 05:27 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to 1qqaaz For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-28-2024, 04:30 PM
|
#18394
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone
Well, the Flames never been able to properly asses the value of their own players so this doesn’t surprise me. The Flames should 100% be looking to trade Markstrom. Keeping him is foolish.
Why keep him? To try and win/build a winning culture? Nope, sorry - not going to happen. The team has a losing culture with Markstrom at the helm of the crease. All he’s doing is keeping this team drafting 9th rather than 5th. Both situations are that of a losing team.
|
I am sure the Flames would probably love to move Markstrom at the deadline but unless something has changed Markstrom doesn't want to move this year and has a NMC. Maybe once Lindholm is out he changes his mind, maybe he decides to pursue a winning team but everything I have heard is that Markstrom doesn't want to move this year. Maybe it is a family thing, maybe a team thing, could be a location thing, I don't know. Maybe he is open to moving in the offseason instead.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-28-2024, 04:54 PM
|
#18395
|
Franchise Player
|
No need to add a whole bunch of extra players to Conroy‘s list. Right now he needs to focus on those UFA’s.
Once that’s done, other players can decide if they like the direction the team is heading or not. Conroy can then use the off-season and draft to move those guys if they don’t want to be here.
|
|
|
01-28-2024, 05:00 PM
|
#18396
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
I am sure the Flames would probably love to move Markstrom at the deadline but unless something has changed Markstrom doesn't want to move this year and has a NMC. Maybe once Lindholm is out he changes his mind, maybe he decides to pursue a winning team but everything I have heard is that Markstrom doesn't want to move this year. Maybe it is a family thing, maybe a team thing, could be a location thing, I don't know. Maybe he is open to moving in the offseason instead.
|
So if he does not want to move his NMC then Conroy’s asking price is irrelevant.
|
|
|
01-28-2024, 06:03 PM
|
#18397
|
Franchise Player
|
Professor takes 22 random-ish data points between 1 and 30/32, averages them, and discovers the average is 15!
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-28-2024, 06:19 PM
|
#18399
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey
So if he does not want to move his NMC then Conroy’s asking price is irrelevant.
|
Pretty much. I think Conroy doesn't really want to have the conversation with Markstrom of waiving because he knows he doesn't want to move this year. I think he would have that conversation if someone offered him a big overpayment but if someone is going to offer the lowball offers he has gotten so far for his other assets he isn't even going to stir that pot.
|
|
|
01-28-2024, 06:21 PM
|
#18400
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
I'm sure they know full well Where he'd waive to. And will only approach him if they feel they got the right package.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:22 PM.
|
|