Quote:
	
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by GioforPM  The termination might.  He was about .5 PPG after 16 games and making $4M (so average money) while not being great defensively I think. | 
	
 
The Blackhawks were, I believe, 7-13-0 when they bought Perry out and traded for Beauvillier to replace him. Since then they've been 5-14-2. So their winning percentage has actually gone down (which is not surprising given injuries). It would be hard to make a case that axing Perry helped them on the ice.
Off the ice, the Hawks replaced one pending UFA with another in the bottom of a rebuild, at the cost of a conditional 5th-round pick. Their cap number is still about the same. They're very slightly worse off for that.
The biggest consequence of the whole fracas so far is that it gave the Canucks enough cap space to trade for Zadorov without retention. The Canucks were 15-8-1 before Zadorov actually joined the team, and have been 12-3-2 since. He's plugged a big hole created by injuries on the Vancouver blue line, so I'm sure they're glad to have him over Beauvillier plus a 3rd.
The Flames were 9-10-3 before the trade and have been 9-8-2 since, so they gained a couple of picks and several million in cap space without any material on-ice change in a losing season. That's a significant win.
From where I sit, it looks like the Flames and Canucks both gained more than Chicago did from the Perry incident.