Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-16-2023, 09:13 AM   #13601
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
People keep adding a camp dump as a must in a Lindholm trade but if the Flames retain 50% the other team really doesn't need to, especially the closer we get to the trade deadline
It’s not a must, it’s to increase the trade value.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2023, 09:27 AM   #13602
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
It’s not a must, it’s to increase the trade value.
You are not getting any more trade value than retaining 50%. A team like Colorado would rather keep Johansson and add Lindholm than have to deal him away.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 12-16-2023, 09:51 AM   #13603
OutToLunch
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Default

I think a few people need to remember that the flames are probably going to retool, not rebuild. A cap dump for the rest of this year and maybe next year is the most I can see happening. I think they'll want the cap space to go after UFA's, to try and be competitive in a year or 2 at most.
OutToLunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2023, 10:17 AM   #13604
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
People keep adding a camp dump as a must in a Lindholm trade but if the Flames retain 50% the other team really doesn't need to, especially the closer we get to the trade deadline
Of course a team doesn't need to add a cap dump. However, they might give you better assets if you take on a guy that doesn't fit their team as well. Especially if that guy is signed for another year.

---

Regarding the Penguins: I just hope that they stay in the middle of the standings, and don't go into a rebuild this year. I think it could potentially flood the market with the likes of : Guentzel, Pettersson, or even Sid.
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2023, 11:04 AM   #13605
Inferno
Franchise Player
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Pas, MB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Original FFIV View Post
Iirc it was down to Edm and when he was ufa. And that’s when we had Johnny and Chuckie. I think he’d waive in a heartbeat given the changes the team has undergone since then.
I don't.

The media and fans there would make his critics in Calgary look like fanboys. Everything is the goalie's fault even when it isn't.

Toronto is the only Canadian team I think he would waive to go to since Vancouver and Winnipeg aren't options. Montreal and Ottawa are in no better shape than Calgary.

Last edited by Inferno; 12-16-2023 at 11:15 AM.
Inferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2023, 11:21 AM   #13606
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
You are not getting any more trade value than retaining 50%. A team like Colorado would rather keep Johansson and add Lindholm than have to deal him away.
Sure you are, if the team acquiring the player is cap strapped and wants to make other moves.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2023, 11:46 AM   #13607
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
Sure you are, if the team acquiring the player is cap strapped and wants to make other moves.
Sure in the right circumstances but the two that were just used were Johansson and Rackell, both those teams are better off adding Lindholm while retaining those players. I was just saying that with the contract Lindholm has you can retain and don't necessarily have to take a cap dump back.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2023, 12:05 PM   #13608
AustinL_NHL
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Exp:
Default

Raanta on waivers for Carolina...

Hmm...

Immediately followed by:

https://twitter.com/user/status/1736100101615980879
AustinL_NHL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2023, 12:24 PM   #13609
Jaydee
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Exp:
Default

ingram defs stole the starts net
Jaydee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2023, 12:44 PM   #13610
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Re Lindholm: How much are people expecting to get for a 60-65pt two-way center who’s a pending UFA? What’s a comparable trade people are looking at? The O’Reilly trade to Toronto?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.

Last edited by CliffFletcher; 12-16-2023 at 12:47 PM.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2023, 12:46 PM   #13611
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AFireInside View Post
This seems like a bad deal for the Flames no?
1st + Yager for Lindholm?

That's a homerun in my eyes.

Rakell being included as a cap dump? Meh either way.
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 12-16-2023, 01:02 PM   #13612
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

The Rakell trade is 100% dependent on how you view him.


Is he an 82 game, 60pt player? Or is he an injury prone player who has played one full season in the last 5, and his 4 assists in 17 games this season (before being hurt) is a sure sign that he is about to drop off completely?



He is signed for 4 more seasons at 5 million after this season. I look at him as being a cap dump with little upside at this point, and a huge risk. Monahan took a 1st to dump a single year of $6.375 million. If you think that Rakell is still a player that has positive value and will continue having positive value over most of the next 4 years after this season, than this is a fantastic deal that the Flames should jump all over. i look at Rakell as a player who is about to fall off the precipice of a mountain top into the canyon below. That's 4.5 years at 5 million bucks.


Also, you have to factor-in the existing contracts. Maybe the Flames could absorb a Rakell, but at some point in that 5 years, the Flames will be trying to become competitive. With the Huberdeau contract on the books, as well as Kadri, adding Rakell's last 2 seasons will keep the Flames in the 'mushy middle' in my opinion. Too good with the new core drafted/acquired in trades to be a lottery team, too many cap-heavy deals to keep them from being competitive enough.


Just say no to long-term risky deals. Yes to short term cap negative deals.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
Old 12-16-2023, 01:43 PM   #13613
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
Re Lindholm: How much are people expecting to get for a 60-65pt two-way center who’s a pending UFA? What’s a comparable trade people are looking at? The O’Reilly trade to Toronto?
At this rate that is the best comparable, wirh maybe a 3 party team that can take on cap too for the Lindholm-acquiring team if need be.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2023, 01:51 PM   #13614
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
Re Lindholm: How much are people expecting to get for a 60-65pt two-way center who’s a pending UFA? What’s a comparable trade people are looking at? The O’Reilly trade to Toronto?
Probably a fair comparable both in terms of what he will return in a trade and what he will get for a contract as a UfA. I think he will make a little more money, maybe as high as 6.5 million a year. But I think RoR is a good comparable across the board.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2023, 02:03 PM   #13615
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

ROR was older and had 19 points in 40 games at the time of the trade. Lindholm already has 19 in 30 right now.

The Horvat trade is probably actually a better comparable...they hadn't agreed to an extension yet at the time of the trade.

But a 1st, A level prospect, and potentially another piece is probably what you're looking at.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2023, 02:08 PM   #13616
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

https://x.com/KevinWeekes/status/173...412166788?s=20

Sounds like Carolina is calling up their top goalie prospect right from the ECHL. Not sure I've ever seen a player called up from the ECHL to the NHL before.

As an aside it's pretty crazy that Carolina doesn't have an AHL affiliate.

Way to invest nothing into player development. Honestly negligent by a franchise to just leave their player development in the hands of other organizations pretty much.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2023, 02:11 PM   #13617
Ped
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

They don't have an AHL team because Chicago wants to be independent ended the agreement, and there wasn't a spare franchise in the AHL
Ped is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2023, 02:13 PM   #13618
Hackey
#1 Goaltender
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OutToLunch View Post
I think a few people need to remember that the flames are probably going to retool, not rebuild. A cap dump for the rest of this year and maybe next year is the most I can see happening. I think they'll want the cap space to go after UFA's, to try and be competitive in a year or 2 at most.
If this management groups think their going to sign a couple UFAs in a year or two and be competitive were doomed.
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2023, 02:23 PM   #13619
Hackey
#1 Goaltender
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
ROR was older and had 19 points in 40 games at the time of the trade. Lindholm already has 19 in 30 right now.

The Horvat trade is probably actually a better comparable...they hadn't agreed to an extension yet at the time of the trade.

But a 1st, A level prospect, and potentially another piece is probably what you're looking at.
If we were a contender would a 1st, Pelletier, and a 3rd be reasonable for Lindholm? I'm honestly not sure. I'm expecting a 1st as a staring point but after that I could see it getting watered down.
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hackey For This Useful Post:
Old 12-16-2023, 02:25 PM   #13620
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
ROR was older and had 19 points in 40 games at the time of the trade. Lindholm already has 19 in 30 right now.

The Horvat trade is probably actually a better comparable...they hadn't agreed to an extension yet at the time of the trade.

But a 1st, A level prospect, and potentially another piece is probably what you're looking at.
Horvat had over a PPG and was on pace for 50 goals when he was traded. That is a player who was playing at a much higher level than Lindholm currently is.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Aarongavey For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:17 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy